False.
If what you say is true, then CCP should simply remove the L5 pockets.
Btw. I reported Salvos for his insulting post as “inappropriate” and each of his posts in which he says the exact same thing as “spam”, as he clearly tries to have the last word without taking part in the discussion.
Happy if more people could help clean up this mess.
5 Likes
That is very well thought through and reasoned. I agree. and that probably is how CCP have set it up.
Although given t1 are also sourced in data sites that might be reflected in a slightly lower filament drop rate. (as seen in SISI)
Then you have violated the flagging rules, as there is nothing inappropriate, or even remotely insulting in my posts.
Based upon what reasoning…? Some people will still want to run t5 filaments. just not everyone. and thereby their lower risk/reward ratio than t3/t4 filaments.
1 Like
L5 will have the best rewards, thus demand is guaranteed,
It depends on a lot of factors, mostly on the precise loot distribution. As it stands now, I’d say you are totally right. We need to keep an eye on all the factors.
1 Like
There absolutely is, whether you are willing to see it or not.
https://forums.eveonline.com/guidelines
and i quote:
" Please avoid:
Name-calling.
Ad hominem attacks.
Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content.
Knee-jerk contradiction."
2 Likes
There is no reason why a single L1 filament should lead to multiple filaments as one progresses along the chain.
All that is needed, is one filament per pocket, to access the next pocket level.
Show where I have done any of those.
I already survived two purges, whereas your “friends” got their posts wiped.
If you have issue with my posts, flag them and report to CCP, instead of spamming this thread with your misguided personal grievances.
But remember, false flagging is a forum transgression.
I know where the lines are drawn. Ive been posting on the internet, and more, than you can possibly imagine.
1 Like
To quote just a few incidences of you being rude, and violating the guidelines statement :
“You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But, remember to criticize ideas, not people”
4 Likes
@ISD_Buldath would you mind going through the last 200-300 posts in this thread and take a look at @Salvos_Rhoska and delete those of his posts where he breaks the rule about “knee-jerk contradiction”, by repeating himself over and over again, saying the _exact_same thing, with no new arguments, just to have the last word?
Thanks, appreciated.
(Also, if you have the time to do that, please delete this post as well afterwards)
4 Likes
Yeah, you wont get any leverage on those, especially considering what they said before those responses.
Report me to CCP if you wish, but stop spamming the thread with offtopic, please.
Especially since you have still refused to answer:
Whats wrong with each pocket dropping only one filament to the next level pocket?
1 Like
You are the one here spamming the thread with offtopic, trolling people.
Complaining about your toxic behaviour is completely on-topic.
4 Likes
This is a direct quote from the Guidelines. And as show above, you are being very uncivil @Salvos_Rhoska
Always Be Civil
Nothing sabotages a healthy conversation like rudeness:
Be civil. Don’t post anything that a reasonable person would consider offensive, abusive, or hate speech.
Keep it clean. Don’t post anything obscene or sexually explicit.
Respect each other. Don’t harass or grief anyone, impersonate people, or expose their private information.
Respect our forum. Don’t post spam or otherwise vandalize the forum.
2 Likes
this has been explained by a number of people including myself a number of times. If you truly wish to have an answer you only need scroll up and read other peoples posts. Otherwise, you are just trolling by restating a question you are unwilling to read answers to.
1 Like
You are trying to wreck/derail the thread.
The question still stands:
Whats wrong with each pocket dropping only one filament to the next level pocket?
1 Like
No I’m not. im doing only 2 things. Answering reasonable questions set by people, including your own. and calling out your trolling and rudeness.
2 Likes
Spamming the same question after it has been answered. Reported.
2 Likes
It has not been answered.
It has been avoided and evaded.