Do you want more protection from people in highsec, or less?


(Dracvlad) #937

What are you going on about? I found it hilarious, who was I spying for again? It was a joke, as in a numb nut to think that would work. You have no sense of humour and you talk about me getting riled up, I mean I just found it really funny, lighten up mate.

And Dom while I am at it someone located it:

https://forums-archive.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=468977&find=unread

The proof.

The impact is Freighters, but we like to pair buff and nerfs to suicide ganking to keep things in balance, and after the February Wreck HP change these ships can handle a bit more tank without the “predator and prey” environment being thrown out of whack.


(Solstice Projekt) #938

Guys. Please don’t get started again.


(Dracvlad) #939

I just found it funny and I would have found it just as funny if it would have worked.

I am English, we tend to call each other names a lot in fun banter, it is a cultural misunderstanding on his part.


(Dracvlad) #941

On his part


(Solstice Projekt) #942

That’s the thing with egomaniacs.
They’re uncurable.

Anyhow, I’d be happy if the two of you destroyed some other thread. You two have nothing to say to each other anyway. All you do is acting like a married couple that’s been together for so long, they’ve forgotten all other ways of talking to each other.

And I sure as ■■■■ am not the only one thinking that.


(Solstice Projekt) #944

And you’re the guy who stuck to the relationship for ten years … no ■■■■■■■ kidding.

Now get off my lawn. Rent a room or something. This place is family friendly. The sexual tension between the two of you is MASSIVE and your absolute carelessness for anything else but yourselves and your silly arguments are making the whole forums a worse place.

I understand when Dom can’t stop, but you’re a man of age. No matter what and everything else aside, it’s something at least you should be understanding!

Thank you.


(Dom Arkaral) #945

I thought real hard about this, but in no place I’ve been this hated :joy:
Which is sad for those hating, considering it’s all over pixels.

@Dracvlad

numbnuts ( plural numbnuts or numbnutses )

  1. (chiefly [US], [slang], [derogatory], sometimes [humorous], often as a term of address) A [slow-witted], [unresponsive], or [inept] person (usually male).

I highly doubt you didn’t know what a numbnut meant, especially since you’ve called me synonyms many times before.

If you can’t have courteous arguments, or cant deal with people being right, please refrain from posting.

Your edit doesn’t prove in the slightest that “But that emergent gameplay was destroyed by the CEO of the main Miniluv corp taking over the mantle of wreck EHP and pushing that through his CSM contacts.”

That’s what I keep asking. Both here and the other thread. And you’re still empty-handed.
https://forums-archive.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=467351 some great ag QQ in here too

Gotta love the mass-flag squads btw
Makes me feel loved :joy:


(Dracvlad) #946

You think I hate you, that is your issue mate. I find you hilariously funny.

Take the action you did, if you want to do something like that you have to develop it a bit more, work something believable into it, not go half cocked and half baked.

You put no effort into it, which is why I referred to it as I did, I found it half baked, low effort, as if your nut was numbed when you decided to do it. If you had weaved a good story and got me kicked then it would have been wall played. But it was not.

So you are upset that I find it highly amusing?

That is the proof, but you will ignore it as per normal feel free. I had it in my head that I heard it but in fact it is there and if you go down the thread you will see people actually talking about the relationship between the change and the wreck EHP. It is all there in that thread.


(Dracvlad) #947

I respond to him when he starts, I find him funny, as in he amuses me greatly. Aren’t I allowed to laugh at things like this.

I played a lot of high stake games and we would all laugh at pulling one over each other or when we failed. It is part of the game, what is wrong with you two?

If he had succeeded in getting me kicked from Spectrum I would have found it funny, but in any game you have to work at stuff to make it work, I hope he ups his game if he wants to do stuff like that.


(Qia Kare) #948

You do not have to sit by the Raitaru as it anchors. If you’re at war, you might have to defend it.

When you drop the Raitaru

  • It will be vulnerable for 15 minutes on Hull.
  • If it survives, it will go invulnerable for another 24 hours.
  • It will be vulnerable for 15 minutes on Hull while it repairs.
    • No fitting, but you can dock/tether.
  • Normal operation

(Foggy Bernstein) #949

Well, @ISD_Dorrim_Barstorlode, it’s time to shovel the ■■■■ again.

This thread is is gettin’ stanky.

Or just lock it. You know you want to.


(Solstice Projekt) #950

You’re not much less of a cancer, Mr. Epeen.

@CCP_Falcon I’m sorry. Really.

Do we have to deal with this? Both their comments further above have been removed by ISD Dorrim already and they show zero sign of self awareness. They just ignored that their posts were removed for a reason and, as they always do, just go back at what they’re always doing.

Always. In every single thread. There’s not even an exception. Several times in several threads I’ve attempted talking to them to get some sense into their heads, but they just don’t give a ■■■■ at all.

It’s literally like two children, and they will keep talking and talking and talking trying to make themselves look better (well that’s more Drac than Dom but whatever, seriously, both are ■■■■■■ up) just because both aren’t capable of just being the greater man shutting the ■■■■ up.

I request having the last posts wiped and the thread to stay open, because it’s a good catch-all-thread for the topic. It covers most ground regarding highsec PvP. Two people should not have the power to close a thread just because they’re assholes. We had that in the past often enough and their nonsense would only get worse and worse and worse.

Thank you for reading.


(Anderson Geten) #952

and childish.


(Dracvlad) #953

What a weird post. And no you are not sorry, what is wrong with you two?

Every single thread, hardly. I was discussing this issue where someone started going off on only nerfs to ganking, but never talking about the buffs, this resulted in me having an exchange with Australian Excellence who can’t help himself in terms of being nasty and I would think that was what was removed by the ISD, the exchange with him, but what he said was interesting in terms of the subject matter.

Dom asked me to link proof of what I had said above about the DCU affect applied to freighters being linked to the wreck EHP, thanks to another ganker player I was able to do so. It is there in that thread what I said. And yet no acknowledgement of that link and what it means, not that I was expecting it of course. What I said was correct and proved right by that link.

I don’t like these he said you said exchanges and I tried to point out that I did not have the link and he just kept on acting as if it was false. But it is done, there is the link. I am fine, no issues, it is part of the discussion

I am in the wrong for the numb nut comment but it was a joke and I did not name him in that comment. As I said I am used to games forums where you have some banter about game stuff. He tried to do something in game, it failed, I told him in an unsubtle way that he needed to do better, I was laughing, I would have laughed if I would have been kicked from Spectrum.

To get something like that to succeed you have to put a bit more into it, but I was also letting Dom know that I was going to have my own toons in my own corp because of him, especially relevant when someone started talking about allowing friendly fire.

As I said above, what is wrong with you two, this is a game, people have a bit of banter and play off of it. Why are you two so emotional about this type of banter?


(Anderson Geten) #954

they are butthurt.


(Dracvlad) #955

This is really an attempt to get me banned from the forums, they keep making the same play again and again. But I am exchanging in good faith with light humour.

The numb nut comment was not about his posting or anything he said, but to laugh about his in game attempt to get me kicked from an alliance which he did not do a very good job with. If I am in the wrong to have some banter over that then I am sorry, but I just found it very funny.

In C&P there is this post aimed at me:

It is really well done, its fun and adds to the forum.

I really do not understand them at all, yes I think you are right and that is sad.


(Herzog Wolfhammer) #956

They certainly didn’t like the “content” of T1 frigates popping their wrecks. So much so that they cried to CCP in such manner they didn’t even complain first in the forums.
That showed me whose side of the toast the butter is on. But then every game is rigged in the end. People don’t play rigged games.


(Herzog Wolfhammer) #957

Oh look, one of them making an “appeal to an amenable authority”. This is how the game go to this point, but it was not “carebears” doing it - or maybe it was, we just didn’t accurately determine who the real carebears were.

CCP how can we get protection from bad threads like this?


(ISD Dorrim Barstorlode) closed #958

(ISD Dorrim Barstorlode) #959

I said final warning, and I meant it. I’m closing this thread now. Thanks to those who participated.