How many times do I have to repeat to you that Sarah Flynt linked it previously.
1 Like
This would do nothing practical to stopping ganks in the current meta.
The gank would be over before the light carrier could apply any DPS. And you would be wasting a highly trained account on escorting ships all day when you could instead be making 50 mil/hr + with that account, even in highsec.
Please try to actually play the game in the area you are making suggestions for and learn the issues to begin with.
First, I have no idea who this AG is.
Second, there is no reason for this to be true. IT’s not a fact, it’s your opinion that so-called “ag” will not shoot the gankers ; I have no idea why not.
Indeed. I have no opinion on the subject.
You just have to see them in “action”. They wait until GCC to shoot, because otherwise, they get a LE, and CONCORD won’t save them.
Making gankers wait 30 seconds once they’re on grid means they will be engaged and possibly destroyed by FACPO before they can shoot their target. Essentially, your change without eliminating or at least also changing FACPO response time would end ganking.
facpo does not react to criminal. It reacts to low ss.
Why would I give a ■■■■ about some people I know nothing about ?
This is your first time mentioning her name since I’ve asked for a link.
You’re just trolling at this stage…
I still want that link where CCP Fozzie said anything about:
Being blapped by the faction police is a risk that most gankers are subject to, because of their low security status…
This is not linked to the fact that you are a ganker, but to the fact that you have a low ss.
You can gank with a high ss, and you can have low ss and not be a HS suicide ganker.
So
is wrong.
Note that I don’t particularly care about this idea. It was to explain why ganking is boring and not interesting nor challenging.
Anti-Ganking. They have a couple of channels (which we monitor 
)
what is anti-ganking ? Why would I care about them/this/that ?
You’ve wandered into a topic which has turned to a discussion of ganking. Therefore discussion of anti-ganking will also arise as it is relevant (the discussion, I mean)
Yet, what are they to be talked about as something relevant ? Are they a corporation ? a group of player dedicated to remove ganking from the game ?
Why is it important that they can’t attack gankers ? Because that’s what was said. So my question is how the possibility that they can’t attack ganker would be an issue ?
A group of players who try to disrupt / prevent ganks. Their intel channel is of some benefit if you haul.
(It’s also of some benefit if you gank)
Won’t, not can’t
won’t. Indeed, gankers can’t gank without facpo coming in. Still, why is important that they won’t ?
They’re easy if you have no outside interference, a non ■■■■ bumper with a freighter not doing dumb ■■■■ and people doing individual roles.
Gets progressively harder with 20 idiots theiving and trying to stop you and doing every role solo while bumping (which is how 99% of freighter ganks happen now)
Even if they’re not solo all that ■■■■ combined, it’s easy to be ■■■■ at ganking. Takes ages to get to the point where you aren’t ■■■■.
It’s been proven dozens of times that you indeed have NO idea what you’re talking about.
That only goes up to a point. When you get in the region of 5+ accounts people start thinking the effort isn’t worth it.
I find it funny all the people still complaining about freighter ganking and asking for nerfs like it’s some huge problem. There’s like 2-3 guys left who even play semi regularly now and they aren’t killing much.
We don’t even want to log in anymore since the traffic and game is so bad… Who want’s to sit there and kill empties nonstop when they’re like 150mil after insurance in a trash game that barely works and is full of bots?
2 Likes
If I were as dishonest as people saying gankers became more organized because CCP patches made it harder, I would say that people play bots because the gankers make it now worth to play otherwise 
That’s pretty obvious.
Removed some off topic posts. Keep it civil and on topics, thank you.
I have already detailed this in the past to you and others and you are trolling by saying link. As I said boring and tedious.
I was talking about the DCU affect being applied to freighters which was linked to the decision to adjust wreck EHP by CCP Fozzie saying it was to balance off against that. The gankers deny that as a nerf, in actual fact that was a balance change totally in the favour of gankers, and yet you lot say it was a nerf.
Talking about boring and tedious:
Good riddance, don’t let the door hit you on the way out!
1 Like
Proving yet again what an egomaniac you actually are. It’s not about you.
This thread is at 822 posts and will soon enough reach 1000.
2 Likes