Equinox in Focus: Reinvigorating Nullsec

By the way, do you even notice that none, like, literally none of my complaints are about ISK?

I complain that bots and multiboxers outcompete low account number players - is that really an ISK complaint?
If you multibox your krab, you can throw more ships, and if you bot, you can throw A LOT more ships, and the fact that lower number of accounts is leaving you with less ships and outcompeted is hardly about ISK. I would like the efficiency of bots and 20 acc multiboxers nerfed just as much as anyone else.

I complain that nullsec has a lot of chores, and the only way to cope is to spread them between accounts - is that an ISK complaint?
No amount of ISK will make fuel magically appear in your stations. You paint the picture of carefree life as if everything just magically works by itself, but this is not how nullsec works AT ALL. Is that really an ISK complaint when I say that I want my game to be more gameplay and less chores?

I complain that there is no point to form for filament MESS trash because it will just filament away from proper response, and improper response will create a lot more problems than it can possibly solve. None of those are ISK issues!

I complain that there is no point to form for hole chickens, because they will run to their hole as soon as you do, and faulty game mechanics prevent your response from doing anything about it. Once again, not an ISK complaint.

It’s like in the head of yours existed a twisted copy of me that is dumbed down to your level that says completely different things from what I’m saying. Where are the ISK complains you’re talking about, eh?

2 Likes

With the latest patch notes for the 27th:

It is pretty clear ansiblex networks are not meaningfully changed and every system is cyno-jam capable based on sun power alone now. It’s not like nullblocs were ratting in every single system they owned. So codifying that fact with game mechanics is just dropping the pretense that they could have had ratters in every single system in theory if they had enough bored players willing to rat in their regional deserts.

So I believe the optimism in your quote is, with the benefit of hindsight, incorrect.

3 Likes

I can’t even find words to describe how terribly wrong you are with most things you say, but its completely pointless to argue with you and just a waste of time. Not gonna keep on doing quotebattles. Enjoy your space, you made it the way it is by your own decisions.

Because there isn’t anything wrong, words to twist it is hard to find. Understandable.

Yes, it is difficult to argue when your position is wrong. Understandable.

I accept your surrender.

None of the current state of nullsec was for me to decide. I do not like it. All I did was cope with increasing limitations and chores the best I could, till I no longer could, and quit. I am not active at this time.

Yes, null is about ISK ISK ISK, If you want PEW PEW PEW go low-sec, and when someone annoys someone in null they get blobed and F1 smashed so that they can return as quickly as possible to ISK ISK ISK.

Yeah, thanks for confirming that you are a) bad at the game and b) invent stories to spread your miserable lies around so others get drowned in your incompetence as well.

But glad to hear about one less massmultiboxpermagrinder in NS, please stay away and make the final step to leave the forums as well, before anyone makes the mistake to believe your made-up horror stories. All the guys I know in NS are doing quite well, they are filthy rich and the only thing they complain about is that their leadership has painted half the world blue so there simply isn’t much exciting content left except grinding ever more ore, PI, bounties and whatnot. I guess thats why CCP make step after step to create content drivers for those wastlands.

So everyone who soundly defeats you in a debate is bad at the game and invents stories.
Sounds like you have a problem.

Nah those are unaffected. I barely had accs.

With clowns like you who provide entertainment? Hardly.

Is that “lalala I’m not listening” that I hear?

All the multiboxers who joined blocs, and botters, are rather well indeed, no argument there.

CCP literally removes content step after step.
There would be even less content after this nerf.
But hey, I guess stupid haters just want to see the hated nullsec 100% empty as opposed to 80% empty it is now. And that’s why they like CCP changes.

Dream on. Not wasting time debating against made up nonsense isn’t a defeat. It’s ‘not going down to some storytellers niveau’.

Not really, its a serious warning to anyone not to listen to your nonsense.

Yeah sure, sounds like a great plan for those evil CCP masterminds. I can imagine their meetings, “How to destroy the game experience for our users”. Thanks for revealing their evil plans, you are so clever. (/irony off)

Notice how there’s no dependency about materials from high-sec, ahhh.

But there is, high sec is the biggest source of Tritanium, also a breeding nest for noobs and safe mission running.

And doesn’t almost all of Eve depend on Jita, if not for sourcing, then for evaluating the worth or your loot, your production efficiency…

You are playing for more than 7 year, you do know if you stop to think about it for a moment. Dependency isn’t always material.

1 Like

But the best materials (most bang per unit), of whatever will always be the exotic materials, which isn’t high-sec.

Not to debate that high-sec should be high times, only it’s been nerfed so much already that it’s not worth comparing with you’re first post which is why I believe it wasn’t adding.

1 Like

At the heart of the Equinox expansion lies the desire to make null security space more meaningful and active, endowed with more customization options for content and activities, and creating topology.

hahahahahahahahahhaahahahhahaha

6 Likes

Just kidding, some systems (even in Branch) has security status -1.0 which mean the highest rank system for rattling npc but the power which is available is only enough for level 3 military upgrades in new ihub and sov system. Why it can be? Although, some low ss system has enough power for 5lvl military upgrades and even some power for production structures etc.
How it can be ?
And when we have a look to a Feytabolis region, we will discover that almost all systems has a good amount of power supply for multiple usage. And this region is occupied (mostly) by Imperium members.

Let me resume this: ccp create the skyhook that could be hacked like the ESS and, up completing the 15 minutes timer, you get around 80% of the gas inside while the remaining 20% will be lost.

Now, thanks to ccp amazing ability to never bend the knees to null sec ceo, it will be a 50% to the thief and the remaining 50% go to a safe vault that can’t be touched.

Oh, can’t forget they make the ansiblex not only cheaper but be able to put in cyno system

3 Likes

On the other hand, you spend 800m on a Skyhook that can be perpetually robbed 24/7. I think people are just generally unhappy with the fact that they can no longer just login whenever and ‘roll a star market for a box of quarters’.

2 Likes

hey if i can rob it its either too far from its people or they cba to defend, either way; thats the owners problem… but then a lot of nullsec seems to be like that doesnt it? whatever happened to nullsec being lucrative because it WAS risky?

1 Like

skyhook was create for that, to be robbed 24/7.

But it’s seem null sec player like to complain instead of defending their supply

2 Likes

Not entirely sure I agree with you there.

1 Like

don’t forget with heavy limits on warnings to the sov holders - creating content while predictably turning into an achilles heel to the existence of sov space itself (no reagent = no sov).

It seems some robbers don’t understand the new sov mechanics.

1 Like

I understand that sov holders that have over extended themselves cant defend the systems they dont use or need.

1 Like