orrrrr maybe because it makes the game nicer to play? have you ever considered ‘quality of life’ improvements don’t equal ‘unfair advantages’?
you really are a sourpuss arentcha
orrrrr maybe because it makes the game nicer to play? have you ever considered ‘quality of life’ improvements don’t equal ‘unfair advantages’?
you really are a sourpuss arentcha
Its not modyfying anything Lucas, and its a web-browser overlay essentially, the same category of function, which is not unfair advantage as stated by CCP.
Now you have done it… expect a stern multi paragraph response.
OMG, we are so unfair knowing it all exists.
TBH - they’re doing both.
One edgelord is going all Doom-and-Gloom-It’s-Illegal, while the rest are questioning the specifics of the project either due to “if it’s too good to be true…” or just genuine curiosity. Or maybe just a chance to talk to the actual dev of something they use.
All but the edgelord seem supportive - even those that said that just plain wouldn’t use it.
– Gadget likes to see what makes things tick
@Cassian_Anders hey cassian, can you update the OP video to the new one? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxkTKKSp_ec
Ingame browser replacement, with extra functionality?
This is a worthy addition to the range of 3rd party tools available thanks to the efforts of players.
I think I shall have a tinker, and possibly update my google sheets so that they work again.
Rip n’ teared my way through 90 posts. Follow all the rules and be civil, first and only warning. If you can’t have a civil argument on the forums, go shoot each other in game. Thanks.
The real hero.
Heads up that Google sometimes blocks people from logging in for reasons I haven’t entirely determined yet.
Because thats criticism thats so much needed here. Not actually anything offensive.
Hey guys, I know this discussion has gotten a bit intense here over this tool. This is a general request to please just chill a bit, leave it be if you need to and please don’t abuse the flagging system.
CCP is aware of this tool and I haven’t heard of any concerns regarding EULA violations at this time. To my understanding this is mostly just a web-browser overlay which isn’t considered an exploit. If other concerns arise we’ll let you know at that point.
For now, please just chill out a bit and we’ll worry about the EULA.
Slightly off-topic, but it’s very refreshing to see you communicating with us like this. Keep up the good work, please.
Could you point out where the author explicitly states that?
The author of a third party tool does not dictate whether or not that tool is EULA compliant. If we identify an EULA issue with a third party tool we will take care of it at that time.
I understand if you can’t say one way or another on this, but what happens if CCP decides it does violate the EULA - will those that use it before that be in trouble, or will there be some leeway?