Forum rules uncertainty / repeated statement

:smiley:

Nice to have some humor in such a topic :smile:

There we go again.

This isnt reddit, and fyi, spamming false flags is not the same as “downvoting” on reddit.

Remember when he used to sit with a dictionary of logical fallacies and just spammed them over and over instead of contributing? I think he though it made him look smart or something. Then I think he bought a copy of the rules of formal debate and start spamming from there any time he embarrassed himself.

No, he’s what’s known as a “liability.”

Let’s just say that this isn’t the first thread that’s been exclusively about how terrible he is. (Every other thread eventually becomes about that, but there have also been quite a few that have started that way too.) It still makes me smile that the announcement thread for the launch of these forums on the previous forums eventually became about whether or not Salvos would be allowed to transfer over. He was sooo terrified that “improved discussion” meant he wouldn’t be allowed to take part. :joy:

2 Likes

Indeed, you are not allowed to define what is spam.

What you did was covered by the definition of spam, thus you did spam.
If you can’t accept this, it is denial.

Quote me where I said that I would false flag or shut your lying crapper.

1 Like

Grats, you three.

You are again doing a fine job of revealing yourselves as trolls, destroying thread, and actively breaking forum rules.

well, it’s time to mute the topic, it’s already been salvshred.

1 Like

Cool down everyone. This thread is now closed as discussion of moderation is against the rules. Maybe @CCP_Falcon wants to add something later on and can take it from here.