You were misreading me. It is not close to, it is disputing the closing of a thread of 10+ people rather than dealing with one troll. I trust the team is able to introspect and reflect such critique, should they ever read this thread.
From the FAQs:
If You See a Problem, Flag It
Moderators have special authority; they are responsible for this forum. But so are you. With your help, moderators can be community facilitators, not just janitors or police.
When you see bad behavior, don’t reply. It encourages the bad behavior by acknowledging it, consumes your energy, and wastes everyone’s time. Just flag it. If enough flags accrue, action will be taken, either automatically or by moderator intervention.
People who invest their time to test on SiSi, share their results in the forums and discuss amongst each other, while possibly providing one or the other helpful remark to CCP, deserve to do so in a civil manner.
OP is asking wether or not we can expect future threads to go down the same ugly rabbit hole as the one you spam-dunked, effectively wasting everybodies time and ressources or if we can hope for support by the Community Team.
Thats a false statement.
The thread was stated first temp locked, and then perma locked, for the reason of spammed false flagging.
No one prevented them from doing so.
The data they provided was invaluable.
The thread had numerous parallel issues being discussed, from mutaplasmid % of success, to filament droprates, to the integral difficulty of the pockets etc.
I was myself civil throughout the thread,
Same cannot be said of some others.
I had nothing to do with the closing of the thread, nor did I spam.
The thread was temp, then permalocked because some people spammed false flags.
You and Andersen are both on record for admitting spamming false flags.
Your attempt to censure /censor me, or have me removed, wont work.
Your attempt to get more people to spam false flags (as shown in your and AGs post), failed, and justly so.
Despite you and AG spamming false flags, none of my posts got hidden.
You and AG did however succeed in getting the thread first temp, then permalocked.
Perhaps that was your intent too, all along.
They cant get at me ingame, so they try to get me removed here.
I’m the #1 most wanted on these troll’s list.
I speak the truth as I see it, and wreck their agenda.
They come at me from all angles, all day, everyday.
The more I’ve had the misfortune to see him post in the past few days, the more I think you’re right. Something’s gone fragrant in his think meats.
edit: Also, as I mentioned I avoided that toilet thread he was crapping in. I’m only annoyed that it was closed because, well, if you’re not going in the toilet, you’re going everywhere else. What a crappy day. Guess I’ll go outside today or something today and see if the forums have been hosed down by tomorrow.
Now the tactic is insinuating I’m not of sound mind.
Mixed with trying to blame me for the other thread being temp, then permalocked, when infact the stated reason was due to false flag spamming, as was practiced by zluq and AG, by their own admission.
mkint is upset and vindictive, as I pointed out that her “idea” regarding Alpha/Omegas is already covered by MCT.
Im sorry you guys and gals are angry, but you have only yourselves to blame for youw own actions.
None of your questions are answered, because none of you opinion make any sense.
Nobody wants you, likes you, needs you in the forum.
You are not participating, you are just trolling. You keep complaining we don’t answer you ; you can’t accept it’s because YOU are trolling.
You are just distorting every thing we say, without making the slight effort to understand the position and validity we prone. Your ONLY effect is to piss everybody who ACTUALLY invested time in the thread in a constructive manner.
You are the cancer of those threads. That’s why people don’t like you. That’s why the forum end up as not being a place to discuss.
We don’t know YOU, we only know the effect you have on the forum. We don’t care about you as a human, we care about you as a troll.
I don’t want you to be removed. I want you to not spam, just like I would want it from everybody else.
I can’t say that I like you, as your way of argueing - for me - is often low effort and trying to win with pretty lame rhetoric tricks rather than actual points. That doesn’t mean I want you removed. Just stop repeating yourself after the 3rd time would be nice.
I havent spammed.
You, however, have spammed false flags.
Not to mention the inappropriate pesonal insults, and your attempts to get me censured/censored/removed, which you have stated time and time again, including trying to encourage others to false flag as well.
mkint avoids talking at things like you. You spammed unrelated nonsense to another thread you didn’t even bother to comprehend and had nothing to contribute to. You were not even part of that conversation because I deliberately chose to exclude you.
Ok, your stink is getting in my brain. Time to mute some threads.
I don’t remember that, but I really only follow discussions that are somewhat close to what I’m doing in EVE. I read other things, but can’t invest myself as my opinion there would not be based on any experience.
Regarding fallacies and all of that, I’ve learned that there is a very simple way to distinguish between a good and a bad discussion:
If all participants are honestly curious about the topic and actively seeking to challenge their own opinion, maybe even the bases of their opinion, it will be great. Those individuals will give the benefit of the doubt for anothers statements, as long as possible.
If participants come to a discussion thinking they already know everything there is to know and simply don’t see the benefit of learning new things, it will always be bad/boring/waste of time. As these people will not give the benefit of the doubt, they don’t want to learn from others, they don’t want to evolve and they will cherry-pick “rules” of conversation however it suits themselves.
