There is more about “harsh” language than argumentation. I was not being specific in that regard. Even when being specific, there still needs to be a differentiation between how it is being presented, context and what is actually being communicated. One can use “harsh” language while still bringing up good points, or dismissing them.
While it is true that there are people who lack emotional self control combined with the ability to form actual opinions, coherent thoughts or arguments, that does not mean that everyone who uses “harsh” language is suffering from the same fate.
This system would obviously not discourage people from being straight up. It would discourage people with a useless harsh tendancy, those who actually have more insults than arguments.
“Being nice” and “using certain types of language” aren’t mutually exclusive. It is only in that persons poisoned mind, that she believes that these two go together. That person most likely also believes that the ones who avoid certain forms of language also must be nice persons.
This form of censorship shall never be allowed, or even advocated for. ■■■■ those who seek to limit language to that which they are able to deal with. It is not our fault that there are ■■■■■■ up people who require protection from words and feelings.
People who demand censorship in the name of their feelings only offer problems, not solutions. While you are right that there are people who are incapable of forming arguments at all, it is wrong to claim that censorship is required also for all of those who can do better while still speaking their minds openly.
The fact that asshole, penis and vagina are not being censored speaks both for the freedom this board allows and the perspective CCP has on the matter. Why ■■■■ and ■■■■, of all words, are being censored is beyond me, but I guess they have reasons.
Why can you not just scroll up yourself? It was Nepsy. I’m not interested in picking out the parts that make you understand it. You are free to read up on it for yourself and understand what it means to understand what someone writes beyond the literal written word.
Specifically this quote makes it quite clear that she equates “people being nice” with “not using harsh language”. If you now wish to go on your usually unnecessary pedantic rant then you must do so alone, because I am having none of that immature nonsense and I will happily leave you with the last word you, in such cases, more often than not seem to desire.
Ha, you found it yourself. Didn’t see your edit early enough. It was also a post even further above, also by her, but I’m seriously unwilling to go through all of it.
Please come up with your own words instead of just copying me, who used it first. I’m not the one with a poisoned mind. I’m not the one who has issues with certain types of language and I am not the one who insists on being pedantic and having the last word, which I will provide evidence for right now.
You can’t help it can you? In a couple of z0ra’s posts they were actually fkn agreeing with you! But as usual you just cherry-pick random words and interpret them in a weird and skewed way in order to just rant and work yourself up.
Why?
It’s bizarre to watch you. You just want to hate everything and if there is nothing to hate you pretend there is then rant about it.
Why would I ? Using your own insults against yourself while showing that you misunderstood his post is just too tasty.
You are the one who claims “this would make X and Y” implies “X equals Y”. Yes, you are. You are wrong, you are dishonnest, and you are insulting people for the sake of insulting them.
I don’t give a ■■■■ about people agreement. When they are ducks, I call them ducks.
Now he says BS and I call him out on that.
Ignoring you and Merin having a hissy spat, would you like to restate what arguments you think were made as counterpoint and ignored?
Rather than screaming at people they ignored something.
You’re a duck. But not one of the cute ones you give grain etc to at the river. You’re the weird duck made from bile that has feathers made of hate. When people throw you grain cos they are kind you attack them with your hate-feathers and weird flame-post-feet cos you can’t understand people who aren’t as rage-filled as you.
That’s what kind of duck you are. A hate-duck. You’re a hate-duck.
Or not !
Since I don’t remember them being answered, I will assume they have not been.
Also remember that I stop reading the moment someone puts insults in his posts, because either you want to convey information, or you want to hurt people.
Therefore, since it’s him and he is intellectually unable to post without insults, I can safely say that none of his posts contained arguments.
Thankfully the world doesn’t rely on your remembering it to exist, or great disaster would occur as you forget to remember people, countries, cities, animals…
Aka, it’s incredibly arrogant to say that just because you don’t remember it in a thread you’ve spent most of it throwing insults yourself, it never happened.
Especially when you can’t be bothered to actually restate these points you appear so passionate about your perceived ignoring.