If you ignore all the counterpoints and say they’re not valid, I suppose you could say there were no counterarguments.
But this thread isn’t for convincing people who are firmly rooted in their beliefs, it’s for people who don’t know if it will be beneficial to have a karma system or not. With enough people agreeing, maybe that low possibility might become a reality
Also, toxic comments severely undermine your points. People only resort to name calling when they run out of ideas or realize people are not agreeing with them.
Why is this important to anyone? If you are curious about people just look at their profile as there is a lot of data there already.
I agree. However, why does CCP give us MER graphs instead of just dumping all the raw data? It’s much easier going through cleaned up information than having to parse through raw data.
Becasue almost nobody cares…Eve is the game you play, not the forums.
When CCP got rid of walking in stations, nobody particularly cared either. However, it still did get a lot of people to complain and try to get CCP to revert the change.
All change needs to start somewhere, and the point of this thread is to get people to care
If enough people take notice and want this feature, there’s always that 0.5% change that CCP will actually implement it.
Also, while forums isn’t the main game it certainly affects eve. Market discussions can influence market trends and GD/PvP/PvE threads can help CCP decide what to change in EvE.
Yet the vast majority of players didn’t care…which is why CCP wisely ignored the tiny minority of the player base. Even less care about this so…
GL Lloyd…
It worked for Luke blowing up the Death Star
Bah…I hear he used to bullseye womp rats in his T-16 back on Tatooine . They’re not much bigger than two meters…
What counterpoints? All you’ve had to offer is “I really want to see karma”. That isn’t an argument, it’s just endless repetition of the fact that you want the feature you proposed.
Those that you ignore by resorting to name calling.
Or when you misquote them and then claim they are insults.
You know, the usual dishonest way to actually acknowledge you are wrong, but are intellectually unable to accept.
I’ve addressed all relevant points that have been raised. “WAAAAAH YOU WERE RUDE AND HURT MY FEELINGS I’M A SPECIAL SNOWFLAKE WAAAAAAH” is not a point. Nor is repeating “I really like my idea and want it implemented” over and over and over again.
fixed.
Sorry there was caps after that, so I did not read it. Anyhow you start with a stupid sentence, I fix it and maybe you are able to fix the idea that follows. Or not, but I can’t do anything to your stupidity anyhow, I think even god gave up.
I assume it was useless BS, like you usually do.
Repeating the same idiotic lie that saying “**** you, sheep****er” instantly negates everything else a person has said does not make it true.
Or not, but I can’t do anything to your stupidity anyhow, I think even god gave up.
And now you demonstrate your blatant hypocrisy, whining and crying about how I lose because I insulted you and then insulting me right back. By your own standard you have no point except insults and should STFU and leave.
Yeah you know yourself very well.
No problem sleeping mate, nice to ask though.
Those two actually don’t go with each other. You are mistaken believing that people, who do not use *what you subjetively identify as “harsh language” are nice. In fact, these are usually the people who are the worst, because they hide their true feelings from you. Someone who is “harsh” is usually more honest and straight up about what he thinks.
This also means that you are more likely to be a bad person, because you do not wish people to openly and honestly express themselves and you yourself are also not willing to do so.
Unless he is dishonest with himself.
Being harsh is not a proof of honesty. It’s a proof of inability to convey an argument without hurting people.
Like you do all the time?
One post later she succumbs to name calling.
Like you do all the time.