Well, you need to somehow pitch your idea, and newbies do not fly freighters, so…
I’ve already given an example of how he blatantly lied (coal jobs). And here’s another: the border wall he promised, which still hasn’t been built and never will be built because it is not a viable idea from an engineering point of view.
TBH, the idea that Trump is great at economic policy is laughably insane anyway. This is the man who took a major inheritance from his (racist asshole) father and turned it into less wealth than if he’d dumped it into a generic investment account and walked away. His business history is full of failed projects, including somehow managing to lose a ton of money in the casino business. But I guess because Trump played a fictional successful businessman on a TV show that must make it reality…
I think you have a basic misunderstanding of this issue because those so called unelected people holding cabinet position had to be voted in as a MP in the first place. Though Lords can also become Cabinet ministers. In France they are appointed without having to be voted in. De Villepin is a good example who was PM under Chirac. This man never stood for anything where he was voted in, and yet he was PM.
In terms of the concept of electoral accountability in the UK system, you have to look at the fact that most times people are voting for their MP as part of a political party lead by a named leader. So it flows through that. I am not a fan of Boris Johnson to be honest.
If a party starts to have issues and looks to lose the next election, they will be removed by the MP’s, you might recall what happened to Thatcher. Until I see any person from the EU resign because of voting by people I have to say that people who say this have a point.
In France which is where I live I often explain this to people who understand it after they get their head around it. I also have fun with the Anglo concept of being free before the law as compared to the EU one of you have these rights. It can be quite fun to have discussions like that.
Anyway, chill Lucas.
That’s because it doesn’t.
Only piss poor people and peasants think it does.
Edit: My post doesn’t break any rules. 
2 Likes
I think the key word here is electoral accountability, in that the voting of people will affect them. This is most certainly the case with the UK system of government, but not the case for the EU positions. Sorry but people have a point with this.
They were voted in as an MP by people and can be voted out by people. So for me they are elected member of Parlement. And I am telling you that in France for example they can appoint people who have never been elected as an MP to the positions in the cabinet. Which I think is way worse.
In France they have a FPTP system for their MP’s, if they gain more than 50% of the vote they win first round, if not they have a second round where the first and second and third place have a run off based on getting above a certain percentage of the vote. You have to have some sort of FPTP system to break logjams like what kept Italy in a state of chaos all the time for many years.
SO. ANYWAY. ABOUT THESE NON-POLITICAL FREIGHTERS…
Freighters etc. Cool. Yeah. Buffs and nerfs. Mods n sh1t.
Jfc people…
1 Like
(i really like the actual face, btw)No idea what that means.
But I tried to make it look like Captain Kirk…
1 Like
Nobody cares about freighters. The obvious answer, “no you are not getting a HP buff because you’re too stupid to avoid getting ganked”, was given over 800 posts ago. All that’s left is laughing at idiot Trump supporters as a break from laughing at farmer trash.
1 Like
Still butthurt, running around insulting people by calling them Trump supporters, grow up manchild.
Yeah fair enough.
1 Like
It’s me. Me me. The real me. Despite him telling everyone otherwise!
It doesn’t need to mean anything.
Kirk does not have a beard, but the resemblence is striking!
Also, because it’s apparently topic for whatever reason: ■■■■ trump supporters!
3 Likes
My apologies.
I’ve left the door open.
She escaped.
Calm down, miners.
1 Like
1. Specifically restricted conduct.
The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to courteous when disagreeing with others.
In order to maintain an environment where everyone is welcome and discussion flows freely, certain types of conduct are prohibited on the EVE Online forums. These are:
- Trolling
- Flaming
- Ranting
- Personal Attacks
- Harassment
- Doxxing
- Racism & Discrimination
- Hate Speech
- Sexism
- Spamming
- Bumping
- Off-Topic Posting
- Pyramid Quoting
- Rumor Mongering
- New Player Bashing
- Impersonation
- Advertising
2. Specifically restricted content.
EVE Online holds ESRB Teen and PEGI 12 ratings. All content posted to the EVE Online forums must be teen rated.
In addition to this, the EVE Online forums are not for discussion of real life current affairs, news, politics or religion. Discussion should revolve around EVE Online and its community.
For these reasons, specific content is prohibited on the EVE Online forums. These are:
- Pornography
- Profanity
- Real Money Trading (RMT)
- Discussion of Warnings & Bans
- Discussion of Moderation
- Private communications with CCP
- In-Game Bugs & Exploits
- Real World Religion
- Real World Politics
- Content that distorts the forum layout
3. Post constructively.
Negative feedback can be very useful to further improve EVE Online if it is presented in a civil and factual manner. All users are encouraged to honestly express their feelings regarding EVE Online and how it can be improved. Posts that are non-constructive, insulting or in breach of the rules will be deleted regardless of how valid the ideas behind them may be. Users are also reminded that posting with a lack of content also constitutes non-constructive posting.
Closed, locked, etc.
3 Likes