While I myself have reported Naari Naarian (directly to CCP) for stating he/she is a game developer when it is obvious that they are not, this does not invalidate their statement unless that statement is based on them actually being a developer (i.e. Im a developer and I know that we are making such and such a choice, opens up that statement to attack upon the persons credibility since the statement is invalid if they are not a game developer).
Naari Naarian makes no claim in the post you are referring to that they are a game developer so making a personal attack against him/her based on past experience is a fallacy, you must attack his point and not him.
p.s. Please donāt force me to defend this guy again, Iām only doing so because fallacies chaff my behind.
p.p.s Im a women (which is a lie) but my statement above is in no way dependent upon my gender so even though i lied about my gender my statement must be attacked directly because my gender isnāt important to my statement.
Lying about things puts your credibility down.
If you lack credibility that same lack applies to any claim you make.
Therefore previous consistent evasive behaviour is relevant. Even if not directly mentioned in a particular post.
STOP MAKING SENSE.
Iām getting worried by the last posts you made that try to actually be nice and make communication happen.
(thatās not insult, just I agree with you both on the respectful form eve if you donāt agree with him and calling people to stop absurd fallacies that make discussion here impossible)
To be clear I donāt like (and actually care) how this guy is posting but I think people who keep aggressing him are as bad, if not worse, than him simply because they know what they are doing.
They donāt get this. Instead they rather open themselves up for potential abuse by wrongly ignoring the personās character and past behaviour. Iām beginning to think that this comes from a serious lack of empathy in general, but no idea yet.
Theyād probably give Trump a second term with that logic.
Meanwhile everyone else is wondering why someone who (as far as I can see) posted once (post 4), with content that was entirely personal opinion (and hence cannot be ādishonestā), is suddenly relevant to a thread thatās nearly reached 150 posts.
If that was the case CODE. people would be considered as retard on the forum after they claimed so many times things that were intrinsically false (obvious statistical data manipulation among them).
