We have AI making art and writing music here in 2021. Surely a simple puzzle or quiz will stop those!
1 Like
i was thinking more about the afk farmers…
but i already conceded
I swear like half the people here have brains that are stuck in the past and still think a couple of wibbly letters can stop a bot.
Botting accounts are paid accounts.
PA is here to make money.
Every botting ‘purge’ you see CCP do is merely a facade. A mere % of the truth.
Bots = $$$. It will never go away.
1 Like
What is your Twitch stream?
In this rarest of cases, yes.
A well-made bot will always be more efficient than a human, no matter how many roadblocks you try to add. Given enough complexity, even a PvP bot could be created that would win most evenly-matched fights. A computer is simply vastly more capable of making quick calculations and estimations than a human mind.
Well, I only meant it as a joke.
“Credit card verification” sounds good, though. There’s usually less cheating in games that have an initial purchase fee compared to completely free games (a good example of this is how CS:GO became an impossible hack-fest when it went F2P, even though it was already pretty bad before that).
$20 for EVE, gets you a month of game time, some PLEX, some skins, whatever. Past that point, you can use the free mode.
Sorry, you’re too late. I just got a perma-ban for showing too much skin.
What we really need is blood sample DNA authentication.
But yeah, CC verification and phone number verification have been some filters I’ve seen more recent games use (to varying levels of success). I still think Koreans and their social security number system is one that would work very well, but people have issues with something like that.
Well, I’m glad I was not too late too much to be able to detect it in time too.
At least if you would have told me before, I could have not have had to hold you responsible for being too late because I was being so early 200 years ago next year.
Especially during the bots pandemic(s, including phase 1, 100 years ago and then phase 2, after those bot wars).
But has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
1 Like
You bet.
Maybe some of the skins you were showing were just old skin and they didn’t really matter for the botting at all…!
Yes, they don’t think it be like it is, but it do.
Verification is not the only problem to the solution,
neither is it the only source of the problem, notwithstanding including the solution in the problem.
It can be part of the problem, however, the problems lies in part in the circumvention of the verification, which by the way, many courts who do work with this are also complicit due to their perception of reality, and, due to their interpretation of that reality based on their limited perception, added to the other more problematic interpretation of their own level of perception of reality, which is as crazy as they are.
Also, due to design constraints, not only restrictions, those potential error from interpretation from those legal entities currently is in courts and I am also applying for police work in law enforcement about it, also in relation to the exact same levels of perception with reality, which people using automation illegally and without authorization to do things which is causing problem, and attack profit, by misrepresenting illegal and dishonest profit and corrupted profit as if being good.
seeking to circumvent not only verification, but, other process related to this verification of identity.
I can cut it in smaller terms, and make it easier to see and understand and apply, however, it will not deter nor diminish the level of intent from the parties who are seeking to do so, use automation against authority, and, even go as far as to try to corrupt the authority so as to seem to be able to achieve their goals, while they in fact are seeking complicity against human rights to do human rights abuse.
In other words, just because someone has a valid identification doesn’t mean that he will not run an illegal program during the course of the processing of the hardware.
The owners of the server do have code to not only detect it, but, which code are bots, and for good reasons.
You can’t say a good inventory program is an illegal bot when
A.
the program is ran offline and in no ways touches hardware used to perform bot actions.
B.
the system is also handled offline, not only due to allegations of bot actions, but, also, to make sure that the system works offline in case of electronic warfare against the hardware.
C.
the system is not only good for community, but, also, helps that community principles to improve against human rights abuse from programs intended to do so, and parading as being good for community when in fact they are mislead and do mislead from the misleading they are led into.
D.
I won’t even add the stress levels related here since it is out of the scope of the medical scope of this thread about control of authorized actions on a hardware server system owned by a company with users it controls.
–
2. - :
One more thing,
because entities try to coerce the police doesn’t mean that police should try to coerce them or others.
Coercion of Variables has nothing to do with police coercion whatsoever, not limited to collusion, which is complicity.
Coercion of Variables has to do with changing a variable type to another type.
Like, from an alphabetical type of variable, or, a logic type of variable, to a numerical type, to be used for calculation, or,
to an alphabetical type, to be used for other interpretation of the logic,
to a lower and lesser logic level.
Edit: you need to stop because I keep getting notifications each time you edit and add more nonsense.
1 Like
Good, then save it on your bot for the bot to read the parts that are good for you and leave the parts you don’t need and that are not related out, and focus on the parts that are good and related to it instead of focusing with so much stress level on the bad parts only.
Heck, you never know, with enough reading skills one day you may even be a doctor for over 25 years like my sister and make over $4 million from it alone, not including other business related from reading skills of reading money, and, actually write about the reading so that others can learn how to read better instead of focusing on the bad parts they refuse to accept and try to blame the ones who make lists of what wrong actions they refused to listen to because they tried to get away with other human rights abuse from bots before.
I won’t even mention how much money they put in those bots because the bots and admin are too stupid to deserve the money they got from it.
–
2. - :
It’s obvious the parts the bots omits to create communication gap, because they seek to use the gap of the encryption to create the lack of knowledge, and, create false sense of knowledge, out of contact with reality, so as to make the important parts to read not be possible to read from their own actions and intents for war.
–
3. - :
In other words, their modus operandi, which is how they seek to control.
Tell me any other things I should use from your system which are against me?
Oh yes, by the way, the courts don’t think it’s that funny when their people and police officers die from it in the line of duty at around 1,000 per years, not published, as you suggest.
It’s no wonder why the courts go to such length and measures to make sure that my work is secure and that the attacks against the communication related to it is not only intent on causing my death and justifying physical injuries from public and private actors in a bad movie, but that they also need it due to the same level of coercion.
That’s why I also have to register copyright for what I write that you don’t read since you’re not authorized to read my copyright registered work, since intents to attack it is not only to make illegal copy of it, which registration of copyright doesn’t only protect rights of author’s integrity in regards to copy, but, rather, right of integrity in matter of the creation of the work for the benefit of humanity, instead of creating bots to abuse that humanity’s rights.
That’s also why I also do register attacks against those rights and I do analyze the networks of the legal entities seeking to forfeit my rights by seeking to interfere against those rights in courts, because I have to deal with other courts that deal with military to redress abuse of human rights such as abuse of human rights done against refugees displaced by wars against their human rights.
The reason I do not only have the right to register the rights of those attacks against me and against my work, including false representation of me being a bot with faulty verification programs, is because those programs are being misused to cause communication gap from delays of procedure, which procedure are abusive procedures against human rights, and abuse the integrity of the parties involved and of the systems related.
This also include and is not limited to, attacks against integrity of security, ID theft, from organized crime, theft of police documents, which the government takes measures to protect, and other attacks to spy on security of those rights, thinking that the rights of the creator of the bots will be abused rather than protected, since no one else does protect those rights and seek to prevent such human rights abuse.
–
A modus operandi (often shortened to M.O.) is someone’s habits of working, particularly in the context of business or criminal investigations, but also more generally. It is a Latin phrase, approximately translated as mode (or manner) of operating.
### Modus operandi - Wikipedia
Modus Operandi is a term also used by the CIA to represent police work, since some police also do attack the CIA by the way.
Operating Systems and trade secrets related to those Operating Systems are part of the mode of operation and Modus Operandi as the name does imply and refer to.
It’s also related to Operational Feasibility, which does include level of popularity, even if it is criminal popularity.
Criminal popularity doesn’t make a system to be meeting Legal Feasibility Requirements.
Legal Feasibility Requirements are at the issue in relation to illegal botting.
I love this guybot
2 Likes
You can simply remove your notification, which notification is not set to inform you about the non-sense you refer to, but, rather, is set to notify you when something is added.
For instance, if I set the notification when something new is added,
even if you only post things about non-sense and attacks against integrity, and interference against integrity, it is all the same.
It’s in the same courts with the same police for the same common nuisance and the same public mischief.
You can’t ask me to be complicit to it because it violates human rights, abuses human rights and intends to do so.
–
By the way, you shouldn’t be setting your systems or bots to cause you harm and try to blame it on others either.
It’s not only against the rules, it’s also against the law and also against international law.
It’s also a form of entrapment albeit illegal entrapment at that.
–
Additionally, if you modify your previous posts with edits which makes it harder to not only read but detect, and then, try to misrepresent the communication in other terms based on other facts which other facts you changed, and then, try to attribute the communication of those change to seem as if making no sense, you’re not only a party to the principal doing that to others, but, you’re also saying that it’s ok for people to do that to others, which is encouraging them to be complicity with it too.
I can go and change my previous comments as you do, to attack as you do, however, it is not going to inform you about the new content which is not the negative attribution you try to invest in, and which you create yourself, and even try to get me to be complicit with, which would be an international crime for me to be participating in doing with you.
I also do report to Interpol too and military, so I suggest you can it while you can.
Is it too late to apologize?
Apologize for what?
For the skin stream?
I guess if you got banned for that and you did it, then, no one else was trying to misinterpret and misrepresent facts and trying to get away with it as if it would legal to do that…
Why would it be legal to misinterpret and misrepresent facts and try to get away with it if no other entities try to redress it?
Just because an enemy engages in war and seek to win DeFacto doesn’t mean that it doesn’t require justification to be preventing the attacks to be justified later.
They will still fight to get justification for their illegal attacks seeking to misrepresent facts to get away with it the same way that their enemies try to do so.
It’s just the simple reality of limitations of human perceptions and limitation of perceptions from groups of humans.
–
It’s like you’re saying it’s not an offense to apologize in vain by taking the name of what is good to apologize for in vain, against moral principle and value, so as to obstruct apology and forgiveness when needed.
2 lies don’t make a right.
Don’t apologize for the wrongs of others, when you didn’t participate in it.
Those others are the ones liable, even if they were mislead into it.
If they were mislead in to it, those who mislead them are liable for the misleading.
It doesn’t mean those who did something they didn’t know they were doing were informed when they asked what they did wrong.
–
Furthermore, stress levels also can do that.
The more stress is caused, the more interference against integrity can occur, and, even if done illegally, the more other additional problem can occur due to inaccurate integrity of data, which inaccurate data can lead to errors and problems.
–
The only time it’s too late to apologize , or, rather, to get forgiveness , is when you intend to be against the spirit of what is good.
Then, because you intend to do bad, cause bad, and mislead others, which is bad, it is not only terrorizing good, but, also, is too late to be forgiven and , not too late to apologize.
You can apologize to death when it’s too late to be forgiven and it won’t change a thing.
If you tried to mislead others about apology being too late for any reasons though, that might be bad enough to not be forgiven indeed.
Also, don’t try to terrorize bad people yourself, there are plenty of good reasons why good entities do it on their own without actually having to act bad, because, the principle of their virtues is such that, it only interferes against the bad parties to do bad.
Here, the illegal botting in question, in relation to control related to it, and in relation to methods of control related to it, and, including policies and rules related to it, as parts of those methods designed to do so.
Just in general, I guess, for everything. I’ve been very bad, and have done a lot of bad things, and everything is just bad. Bad all around. Just very, very bad. I really don’t want to be interpoled again…
Sorry, but the Interpol is good, they only work mostly for communication with other police organization which are member of them, if you don’t work for them yourself.
–
Also, if you have a complaint you may file it in Lyon, France.
–
By the way, they also work with the International of Global Association of Chiefs of Police.
Interpol works with the UN although they are not a member of the UN, which UN does involved many other systems including the Economic and Social Council,
https://www.un.org/ecosoc/en/about-us
with the High Commissioner, and other related entities, including the High-Security Council, from China, the US, France, UK, and Russia.
https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/
Peace and Security
The Security Council has primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security. It has 15 Members, and each Member has one vote. Under the Charter of the United Nations, all Member States are obligated to comply with Council decisions.