High Sec Candidate

[Scipio_Artelius]

@Dracvlad

That is not relevant to what the candidate stated.

The various, perfectly in context, relevant quotes:

This thread OP:

@Lorelei_Ierendi

Ganker: I would like at least a 50% chance of walking away from a gank. At the moment this is not the case. On my blog, in the past, I mentioned some changes to Concord that I would like to see.

CSM XIII Campaign Thread:

@Lorelei_Ierendi

Ganker : I would like at least a 50% chance of walking away from a gank. At the moment this is not the case. On my blog, in the past, I mentioned some changes to Concord that I would like to see.

CSM XII Campaign Thread:

Ganker: I would like at least a 50% chance of walking away from a gank. At the moment this is not the case. On my blog I mentioned changes to Concord that I would like to see.

CSM XI Campaign Thread:

Ganker: I would like at least a 50% chance of walking away from a gank. At the moment this is not the case. On my blog I mentioned changes to Concord that I would like to see.

So what are the CONCORD changes proposed over the last 4 years:

CONCORD

I can envisage a world where CONCORD response is random, with a range based upon the SEC of the system. CONCORD does not then sit (like police in a donut shop) where they spawn, but once the criminals have been punished… the CONCORD squads fly off in search of new targets.

If the random response time has an average that is not significantly different from the current numbers… then on average the ganker-types would not be disadvantaged. This would remove the need for them to “pre spawn” concord, and to “pull” concord when they have done their dirty deeds.
But maybe the cops were just around the corner, when the crime went down… Or maybe they were in the donut shop on the other side of town.

More RANDOM in CONCORD response times, and having the CONCORD units fly further on patrols once they have avenged a victim would make for a lot more lively and exciting time in High Sec!

No one here is taking anything out of context or complaining about things the OP hasn’t said.

She wants to introduce randomness and get to a point of a 50% chance of survivng a gank.

We are just discussing, quite reasonably until your white knighting came along, what this all actually means.

There may be merit in some of it, but not the way it’s currently proposed, and since this is a CSM candidate thread, we have every right to ask questions, just as you do.