Yes, you can be logged in to EVE and not be playing…shocking I know.
So then we’ll just add that claim to the pile of other unverified claims you have made…
You do know that ships drop loot and salvage right? You do play the game, right?
Knowing the game is not the same as knowing every personality that has played over the last 16 years. How about you just link to that proof of yours…
Weird as they could just hit the bumpers but hey, that would be easy right… ROFL
Is it?
Well you have not proven that it does not exist. It certainly existed when I was in the CFC.
Wow a bumping Macherial is so full of juicy loot…, maybe one or two have decent MWD’s but that is about it.
Faylee Faye was bumping and was at one point going to stand for CSM 14. He is a very well known player.
You have that out of context because there would be no bumper in what I wrote, reading and comprehension is so hard at times 
Really? This is now the extent of your argument? I can’t prove Bigfoot doesn’t exist; do that mean it does? Pathetic…what happened to those master debating skills you claimed to have?
Still doesn’t change the fact you are yet again not proving any proof to your claims…
My bad…I didn’t realize that you are now crying/sobbing about BOTH ganking and bumping. So many things upset you it’s hard to keep track of.
You have not proven that it does not exist, and I repeat when I was in the CFC I and my mates were on it.
His thread had a running total of how much he made bumping without a gank fleet.
It is your bad, that is correct.
You made the claim…the onus is on you to prove that claim.
Great! So you have a link to that thread then?
It is your sobbing and crying, that is correct.
It exists and trying to pretend otherwise is amusing.
Like you did not know about the -25% ROF on Catalysts…, lol.
What a sad simpering reply.
The burden of proof is on you…waiting.
Great! So you have a link to that thread then?
Two easy to prove claims…but nothing from you, again.
Yawn…, it is like Galaxy Plughole not being able to use a locator agent…, seriously!
The first one is easy for anyone to verify, speak to a Goon friend. As for the Faylee thread it is in C&P. It might have been locked now, but it is there if you can work out how to search… Basic internet skill by the way!
And with you continuing to use this lame reply you are now blocked on the forums.
Two easy to prove claims…but nothing from you, again.
No I meant… if your scout is sitting 30km from the target, lined up with the gate, you can warp directly to your scout at 30, and land on the target with exactly the same variance with any other warp in. Naturally in crowded belts it makes it harder to loot… but it opens up the numbers of targets.
The slight random in the warp in is one of the random things currently affecting ganking. That and the ECM chance of the caldari police.
Its ok. I understand that people that like eve are very enthusiastic. I am also very enthusiastic.
When I logged in this evening I had over 400 posts. That is still something. And more views than any other thread in the current election campaigns. (probably most of them were me).
I know. That is what makes all this forumming relatively… pointless. Nothing I say or do makes you want to vote for me, and nothing you say or do stops a significant number of people voting for me (even if they read this far…).
You do know you can cast votes for more people? And that they do count (depending on the order people get eliminated or elected). You should try and spend all your possible votes.
o7
Stop talking rubbish. I’m not aligned with CODE. and recently was at war with them (check my killboard).
Put up facts or STFU because spreading lies doesn’t help anyone.
Only one of my freighter pilots could be directly linked to me, so there would be no way for anyone to blue them and my whole point is coming from an angle as a freighter pilot, nothing to do with CODE.'s position. They can argue for themselves and don’t need my input. I’m just not a pussy carebear and actually enjoy challenge in the game. As a freigher pilot, more danger, not less, is what the game needs.
What contacts?
You have no clue who my contacts are, anymore than anyone can know who’s contacts people have. I have zero to do with blue lists. They only serve to limit who you can shoot at.
Just stop being a liar. There is enough to talk about without lying.
What does autopiloting freighters not being ganked, possibly have to do with me?
Over the past 4-5 years I’ve consistently argued that whining in the forum for CCP to change the game in favour of more safety is against what the game needs and that players should take responsibility and accountability for their own safety and what happens to them. For freighters, webbing alts provide near perfect protection from bumping and lower an already low risk of being ganked, to near 0. Webbing isn’t relevant to autopiloting and every ship on autopilot deserves anything that happens to it.
The fact that so many people can set their freighters to autopilot in highsec, shows how safe freighter hauling already is and the changes proposed by the OP will only lead to more people setting and forgetting while they haul around highsec on autopilot, not even playing the game.
The game doesn’t need that. It will only erode further, the harshness of a cold, dark space and continue the journey to farmville that has been occurring for the last few years.
So just stop with the lies and pretend insight into things you really have no clue about.
I have not yet read all the posts that have been up since I left yesterday.
But…
Please don’t drag CODE. into my thread any more than necessary.
Nothing I am saying or doing is directly to do with them… but any forum thread that includes them disintegrates into more distraction than I am willing to handle.
CODE. belong in Crime and Punishment. Maybe make a thread there to continue this discussion?
I defined it in the CSMX thread.
Got any numbers to back up your theory?
Please not.
My thoughts on bumping have been documented. Let’s try and keep my thread about me!
Feel free to link a thread in the general forums however! 
OK sad rabbit here. 
I saw many new posts… but… well.
At least people are taking care to keep my thread bumped!
Nah, I read all the stuff in here as well. One might wish for an active campaign thread until you see what it can look like.
m
Hi Mike!
Thanks for reading!
I promised to read all the stuff here, and I do. I also have people that check the thread when I am unavailable and let me know if anything important is posted… and I need to get to a computer.
It’s a bit frustrating how everything is running on exactly one tiny part of everything I have consistently posted in these threads for the last five elections… and anything else I said is being ignored… but anyway it is the same 5 or 6 people.
Honestly I would rather be talking about things like “none of the above!”.
It is well known how little the forum really affects the voting.
It’s the only thing that really differentiates your platform from anyone else’s. Just being a highsec candidate doesn’t distinguish you from Mike, or Steve or anyone else running on a platform of highsec experience and perspective.
Everything else, there is some other candidate with a similar position, so it doesn’t matter whether people vote for you or not on the basis of those points.
I’d like to explore that more… because I actually make a point of not checking heavily on other people’s threads so I don’t steal ideas.
Who else is doing that nowadays?
I expect some people are playing on the NPE, because it is important. Not sure how many miss watching Grimmi on livestream.
Probably also hot sauce this year, given that CCP are trying to do something here.
I also bet that everyone is riding around on the bounty system, because that sucks…
Of course. The “social corporation” mechanics thing (that got me so many votes back in CSMX) that CCP have introduced are… quite… erm… not what we were hoping.
Other things… making mining more interactive, changing anomaly locations (ice) to require more thought on the part of players…
Those are all being championed, of course, by multiple people.
Is anyone actually compiling a list of who is for what or advocating what? I mean it is actually irrelavant anyway, because the CSM can’t force CCP to do stuff.
(Pink ships are fun… )
Fine. Either repeat it here then, or provide a direct link that allows anyone interested to easily see what exactly it is that you’re talking about.
Stop pretending it’s each and every one of us that should go look it up deeply buried somewhere when you’ve proven already you’re not even using such definition consistently yourself at all…
LOL. Says the person that claims chance of success of a suicide gank is 100%…
But it’s OK, I’ll bite again, just to let you see what backing up claims with facts looks like. What type of ganking do you want to use as an example? Miners? Haulers?
Let’s take haulers, for example. If you want to move the goal posts to the whole target selection and ganking process, then all haulers moving along any given route become potential targets. How many of them do end up being ganked either at the origin, at the destination, or at some gate along the way? Do you need any concrete numbers to see the chance of surviving a gank is WAY higher than 50% already? Really?
Go sit at a gate then, and start counting how many haulers jump through it during a set period of time, then check how many got ganked at any station that could possibly be their origin or destination or at any gate that could possibly be in their route (see how generous I’m being here?). Then tell us again how the survival rate is not WAY higher than 50%…
Hint: Even if there was a ganker successfully ganking every single hauler going through a gate as fast as he could, the chance of surviving would still be WAY higher than 50% for the sole reason that the ganker has to wait that 15 min criminal timer between ganks…