I think they are using an AI translator. I’ve given up trying to correct them at this point with their many false statements.
Obviously they keep forgetting to add “Make no mistakes” to their prompt.
Rookie move.
I won’t give them that benefit of the doubt after lying and saying that it wasn’t ai written. You don’t need chatgpt to translate language, you can go post it in the forum for the corresponding language, or post a google translate of it here, we can tell from the diction and style that its ai, and I’ll call it out for what it is, lazy, unprofessional, and for the weak minded.
Why are you unable to use an AI properly? Please take some courses on how to prevent walls of text. You can ask the AI to shorten the text to the key points or have it redo your text and limit the size to a number of sentences or paragraphs.
No one wants to read walls of text here that you didn’t even write on your own.
If the quantity is not in a sane relation to the content, it is spam. And i am currently thinking of reporting it as such.
CCP should really update their forum rules to get the AI slop posters out for good.
3 Likes
It seems you have no history learnt, Also you’re arguing against claims I never made.
High‑sec has never been able to run reactions, move capitals through gates, or produce T2 exclusively from high‑sec materials — and that’s exactly why your questions don’t contradict anything I said.
For accuracy: before the Crius industry update (i had to look it up what the name of the update was 
in 2014, and yep it was possible to build capital ships in high‑sec.
They could not use stargates and were effectively stuck in the system where they were constructed, but they could still fit modules and defend themselves with drones if attacked. Between 2014 and 2016 CCP removed high‑sec capital construction entirely,
And any remaining high‑sec capitals were (socalled) grandfathered.
After that point, NO new capitals could be built in high‑sec at all.
But none of this is the core issue. The point is that before the 2021–2022 industry rework, high‑sec T1 industry was accessible for returning players. You could build a wide range of T1 ships and modules without needing > split blueprints, > extra components, > or null‑sec‑exclusive materials. <
after the update of 2021-2022 , The rework increased dependency, complexity, and material requirements to the point where even T1 production now forces players into null‑sec supply chains. That’s the change returning high‑sec industrialists run into — not some imagined loss of T2 or capital production that never existed in the first place…
for you to look at is the Crius update from 2014.
I’m writing my own posts.
If the length or structure isn’t to your taste, that’s fine ,but that doesn’t make it spam, nor does it invalidate the points being made.
If you disagree with the content, address the content.
Calling it AI or threatening to report it is just avoiding the discussion.
A good discussion is based on arguments, not on trying to silence someone because you don’t like the format.
2 Likes
Sure you are.
If someone wants to critique the content, that’s fair.
But throwing in lines like ‘rookie move’ or comments about prompts isn’t an argument
it’s just noise.
i am not trying to win a style contest.
If you have something meaningful to add, feel free to do so.
1 Like
If I use tools to help structure or refine the English, that doesn’t change the fact that the ideas, arguments and experiences are mine.
If you disagree with what I’m saying, address the argument instead of trying to discredit the format.
A discussion is about ideas.
not about trying to silence someone because you don’t like how they write.
1 Like
I have no issues with how you write.
I just object to posting walls of slop on the forum and getting upset when people point out they’re not going to read it.
What you should instead do is ask the LLM to explain a concept for you, then you write your own post based on what the model told you. I’d much rather argue with a human using poor grammar, than with an LLM.
1 Like
Here is chatgpts reply to your chatgpt post: "You’re not being criticized for “using tools to refine English,” you’re being criticized because your posts read like they’re generated to sound substantial rather than be substantial.
There’s a difference.
When every reply is a long, polished wall of text that says very little, it makes discussion worse, not better. It buries actual points under filler, makes it harder to respond directly, and shifts the conversation from specifics to vague generalities.
If the ideas are truly yours, then you should be able to express them clearly and concisely without needing three paragraphs to say what could be said in three sentences.
Right now, it feels like you’re outsourcing clarity to a tool, and what comes out is bloated, repetitive, and hard to engage with.
So yes — this is about the format, because the format is actively getting in the way of meaningful discussion.
If you want people to engage with your arguments, tighten them up and make actual, concrete claims about high sec mining that can be responded to directly.
Otherwise, it just reads like noise."
Do you see why this is going to be unproductive yet?
1 Like
Apart from exploits, it has never been possible to produce capitals in highsec. There has never been a highsec capital industry. Your chatbot is hallucinating and you’re not smart enough to realize it, so you keep posting lies about a past that never existed.
If you go read those patch notes - and I realize I’m being extremely generous in assuming you can read on your own - you will notice that they don’t include anything about producing capitals in highsec.
You have not made a single post that amounts to anything more than long-form misinformation.
The bigger problem is that what they post is simply fictional. The “facts” asserted are incorrect, often to the point of being the precise opposite of the actual situation. That it’s bloated, repetitive, and hard to engage with is a deliberate feature meant to obfuscate and pull attention away from the inaccuracies.
And yet no one wants to actually debate the points made by the OP; which boils down to CCP is constantly trying to force high sec players towards the null blocs.
1 Like
You waited all this time just to post on your alt? People have addressed all the points.
I couldn’t get OP to actually say something that was even remotely correct. I couldn’t get around to what the OP meant by anything due to their constant misinformation.
CCP isn’t actually. If anything they want more people in Pochven and Lowsec.
I’m no one’s ■■■■■■■ alt, get that straight.
Sigh it doesn’t matter to me if that’s your main or not. I do think you are likely the same person. I don’t know what to tell you. If you aren’t you’re defending a buffoon and didn’t read the thread.
As a vet and returner over 6 years …Since 2018, EVE has been pushed further and further away from the player‑driven sandbox it was built on. the universe where freedom, regional identity, and emergent gameplay defined everything. It used to be a space where our choices shaped the world, not scripted events or top‑down design. What we get now is a guided, theme‑park direction: less freedom, more control, the erosion of regional identity (simply to keep inflation in check), high‑sec reduced to an afterthought, and null‑sec elevated as the only space that seems to matter. As a veteran who lived through the era when players defined EVE, I won’t pretend this forced shift is acceptable. I’d rather walk away than dance to CCP’s new tune. I’m a high‑sec vet, not a player to be forcibly relocated because it suits CCP’s new vision.
2 Likes
The freedom is still there…i still go anywhere i want, anytime i want. Regional identity?….thats your responsibility…make your own identity and the area around you. Emergent gameplay?.. Hmmm you sure you want to break the skin on that slop bucket again?
Read first reply above again ^^
Players still define EVE.
Youre still here.
Theres that “omgerd the devs are forcing me” garbage again. Why do people who play games always use this argument to back up why they dont like things. You have the choice to go where ever you want, thats never changed.