How did we reach the Moon thru the Van Allen Radiation Belt?
The Apollo craft can be seen in various museums, they have no radiation shielding.
How did we reach the Moon thru the Van Allen Radiation Belt?
The Apollo craft can be seen in various museums, they have no radiation shielding.
Duh thatâs what the tin foil hats were forâŚ
Its the kind of good question people are uncomfortable to answer.
Kind of like how does a skyscraper fall from a fire.
Maybe harmful to guidance systems, computerâs electronic s, didnât say anything about people , Apollo did not rely on âadvanced systemsâ, this is overly dramatitized ârealityâ show or heâs trying to sell somethingâŚsparkplugs for your diesel perhapsâŚ?
Q: How did we reach the Moon thru the Van Allen Radiation Belt?
A: moving fast through it in the night side of the planet (where itâs weaker) and being exposed to it just for a short period of time.
Radiation damage is cumulative. A short exposure doesnât causes enough damage to do harm and actually radiation was a lesser danger compared to other risks involved in the mission (just ask Apollo 13).
Well, what would Van Allen know anywayâŚthe Bacofoil Bonnet Brigade probably think thatâs a 70âs Prog Rock band anyway.
Ignoring the science above, since the tinfoil titfers will say heâs in on the hoax, just how many people would need to stay quiet about such a lie? 1000âs? Tens of 1000âs?
This ignores the fact that itâs not just NASA, but Russia, China, Japan, India, and anyone else with an interest in moon landings? Surely Russia would want to discredit their largest rival?
Maybe this is why Trump is so close with russia. Maybe russia threatened to release proof that the moon landing was faked, and so Trump agreed to act nice to him?
They didnât go through the radiation belts, thatâs how. They went around them. They donât cover the entire planet, they are concentrated.
^this^
nobody said you have to go through it.
I remember astronauts being debriefed doing high orbit shuttle missions, the higher the orbit the greater the cosmic ray visual phenomena.
All stated they needed greater shielding to go higher.
Buzz Aldrin on the moon landing and why we never returned.
Thatâs my question. I want to know," he said. âBut I think I know. Because we didnât go there. Thatâs the way it happened. And if it didnât happen itâs nice to know why it didnât happen so in the future if we want to keep doing something we need to know why something stopped in the past if we want to keep it going.â
But hey he was just the 2nd man on the moon right?
The technology to pass through the Van Allen radiation belt wasnât developed until the space shuttle.
Now ask yourself why NASA has to use photoshop and has been caught using it.
Nasa is not a public organization it is military disguised as public.
Federal Express is not federal, there is NOTHING in a name.
Nonsense.
That pretty much sums up the official response from the government since this happened.
Of course its not plausible that people conspired to steal funds from a program to enrich themselves. Its not plausible that it continues through grossly overestimated military budgets since.
The only thing you can count on from the government is corruption.
Now quick everyone look at Trump hes doing something. Ignore reality.
Itâs just around the earth. The moon mission went beyond the radiation belt pretty quickly. The shuttle on the other hand operates in low earth orbit and therefor they have to have more shielding etc against this.
Now look, you really need to stop bringing actual science in to this. I mean, itâs just not fair. It also makes it look as though you too are a part of this pan-governmental, cross-continental, poly-ideological, multi-decade conspiracy.
Well I just need the money and they are paying really good
Iâd be interested to know how, theyâd have to be paying off 100âs of thousands of people across their whole lifetime. Ahhh hang on. Thatâs where all the NASA budget goesâŚ
I will never understand the theory of saying Russia or China will reveal some truth about something that the American one wont. First who would believe them if the government said not too, does anyone in America believe almost anything Russian anymore? Propaganda is thick here. Next why would it be in that countrys best interest to reveal anything? Have you looked at the âfreedomâ in china, you cant even talk about whinny the poo due to restrictions.
Who does that leave that is supposed to be âcredibleâ as a âhonest source of informationâ? Britain, yea land of the honest there right.