How orca miners are going to Plex their accounts after the mining changes?

Communications Center General Discussion
126

Calm down

127

Yea your fit for me on tq is 63k. But I currently lost my omega status so that’s probably why. But my sisi is still omega

128

so ATM the procurer lost 20k EHP on that fit. So it’s not gained “significant increase” yet

129

yea after going back omega on tq, your fit is 71k

1 Like
130

The addition of a third low slot to the Procurer means a hull tank will become better.

[Procurer, *Procurer I]
Damage Control II
Reinforced Bulkheads II
Reinforced Bulkheads II

Multispectrum Shield Hardener II
Multispectrum Shield Hardener II

Ice Harvester II
Ice Harvester II

Medium Transverse Bulkhead II
Medium Transverse Bulkhead II
Medium Transverse Bulkhead II

My mining alt gets 80k EHP in that fit, if you have level 5 skills you may get a bit more. Or if you skip the mid slots for scram web, you still have 71k EHP which isn’t bad.

My main issue with the Procurer is how it went from the most agile barge to the absolute slowest aligning barge of them all. 15 seconds align time?! The Procurer is supposed to be good in combat, why is the Covetor the fastest aligning barge now? It makes no sense to me.

1 Like
131

Sell the Orca. :slight_smile:

132

I think a lot y’alls are being conned by wanting to tank the Proc. Its so cheap, its pretty much disposable.

133

Ships must never be lost. Losses must be avoided at all costs. Wallet balance must never go down, only up. If your ship explodes and you have to buy a new one, you lose the game.

1 Like
134

Cool, so Catalysts that explode should repawn in their owner’s bays.

Or even better, in their manufacturer’s bays.

1 Like
135

Simple: like the rest of us.

136

If the proc becomes even more tankier than it is now, then it needs some drawback. The proc becomes less agile and as consequence it can be bumped easily from the ice belt.

137

It’s less tanky than it is now, and the lack of agility is more likely an oversight by CCP as result of doubling the mass.

138

It’s radio silence after that. My bet is their position is unchanged. The position and reasoning as presented by Eyjo, are as valid today as back then. It makes sense to intervene.

139

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.