Try reading the entire statement.
Again…Which was? Directly quote is so you don’t weasel out of it later…like you are already doing…
Oh, you mean like what you’re desperately trying to do right now.
Yeah, more flip flop from you. Instead of doing selective quoting, try reading the entire statement.
I asked you to directly quote what you are referring to so there are no issues…why is that so hard for you? Do you not know how? Would you like to learn?
You know exactly what I’m referring to which is in my statement that you so conveniently decided to do selective quoting on.
My god…all I am asking for you is quote EXACTLY what I wrote so I can respond to it without fear of miscommunication…Yet here you are rambling on about flip-flopping or selective quoting or what ever else you can dream-up…
It’s sad that a simple request reveals the level of dishonesty you bring here. I asked for a quote about 7 posts ago and 30 minutes later here we are…still waiting…
1 Like
first of all, you are a independent player who want to play his own game.
and there is the problem, that play stile is only possible in HS in normal surcomstances.
the nerving towards HS is in the last years has come to a point it is almost worthless to play in that system as a single player fooling around with pve stuff …
you are a player who does not want to join corporations who tell s you to do this or that .
i completely understand why you want to stay in HS, (for example if you want to make a corporation in null, you have to join a bigger corp otherwise you cant survive the mass )
and there lays the problem … that is why you choose high sec as your home (like many others).
ignore people who say can i have your stuff and others with some good advice (they don’t understand its also income for ccp)
and yes ccp is forcing people to join big corporations, you don’t want to join. for many reasons. (the powerhouses)
you can say there is no room for you to keep your head up at some point.
while ccp tells you there must be room for everyone…(what became a lie in the last 4 years)
if people struggle to stay in a game …they finally give up (you know… its still a game)
you don t want to leave HS because it feels like home (it is your right to feel that way).
the game is a 17 years old concept and you can ask your self if it is still worthy to play a game that rules out players in a certain playing field from the past…(like …WIS) (some players don’t understand they will soon be a victim of that change and i mean null sec an low players))
even tho ccp is saying it is still a healthy environment players still play in the game they will soon feel the “chaos” in their development in the form of their shareholders (you see it may look nice and all of that, but the bottom line is their income).
ccp is ruling out normal indepent and small group s of HS players, its not their goal, but they don t understand independent players …(witch is a minority of the players)
and you and more are just one of them…
let’s say: we will meet, somewhere and sometime in the future.
■■■■ happens.
2 Likes
You’re right – there should be content for everyone. CCP doesn’t understand this and good luck conveying a point with this forum community as the subsequent responses will show.
High sec is the same as it’s always been. Actually it’s better now for most carebears. You can still make excellent money on L4s and if you’re a miner you now have ubiquitous access to both 80% refineries and to compression making your ore significantly more valuable.
The two systems that have been flipped by the Triglavians are inconsequential.
1 Like
OMG, either you’re just really dense or you fail miserably at trolling. And now you’re trying to portray me as being dishonest. What a huge pile of BS you’re pouring out here.
How about you actually try reading what was posted here.
Quote the text…it’s not hard…been asking the same thing from the start…
Again, if you don’t know how, I or somebody else can help you.
Also, it’s sad that you are now resorting to calling me a troll when I just keep asking politely for the same thing. Maybe you should look in the mirror…
1 Like
yeah bruh, i remember trigs descending on me back in 2012 and one-shotting my newb mining ship. i remember npcs gatecamping high sec systems. great gameplay, bruh. this was totally a thing between 2003 and 2012, bruh.
1 Like
Just as I thought, even after linking it you still refuse to read it. The only thing you proved here is that you’re incapable of scrolling the page up to actually view the entire convo.
Did I ask you to link it? NOPE…The only thing you proved here is that you’re incapable of quoting text.
1 Like
I’m not going to do your work for you, you obviously have a problem since you can’t even keep track of a little bit of text.
For Christ’s sake, scroll up and view it yourself.
Here…I’ll say it again as you clearly don’t get it.
I want to know EXACTLY what you are referring to…so quote it. Don’t link it. Don’t whine about scrolling. Don’t point to it. Just quote it…it’s not hard…
If you can’t do that, ■■■■ off.
1 Like
You seem to not understand that I’m not going to do your damn work for you.
Same to you asshat.
Well, this is very much off the rails.
1 Like
Confirming nerfing wardecs was bad both times. Nerfing watchlists was bad. Giving freighters fittings was bad. Giving freighters more ehp was bad. Giving mining barges more tank and ore bays was bad. Giving the orca a competitive mining yield was bad. Putting high end ore in hisec was bad. Turning off friendly fire in corps was bad.
1 Like
Maybe if you participated in the PVE portion of the invasions you wouldnt lose systems to null sec status. Just saying.