She seems to have been lost her mind.
Poor girl.
1 Like
That implies she ever had it in the first place. 
3 Likes
Well , this is what happens when your main doesn’t buy a mining licence, you sprout an army of batshit crazy alts. What is really disturbing though, is that she is wearing yellow, we all know who likes yellow.
1 Like
Your right!
Very suspicious 
So Cleo is a frostpacker alt? This makes sense, if you connect the shameless dots you begin to see a wordsalady attempt at shifting attention on himself while on the blacklist.
Begging for attention hand outs tsk tsk how far he’s fallen
Also was very supportive of the Frostpacker as well, patting each other on the back without substantial reason to do so, clearly fake, desperate and forced attempt at lifting social status, which failed miserably anyway, not unexpectedly though.
Can only describe it as I did before, with one single word:
Meaningless
1 Like
I like ganking.
Blapped me one of those fancy tier II advanced ventures the other day. A prospect I think.
Totally worth it.
1 Like
You are not supposed to see them, they are like …invisible. The little mischiefs can carry about 200mil worth of gas though so blap some more.
1 Like
I don’t engage people who are in non-combat ships unless they’re in null or are just asking for it (mining in low sec). If they’re in high-sec I’ve never once engaged in a gank and I won’t. I actually think Concord should -5 people’s sec status for every single ‘kill’ they have in high security space. You should be able to do it, but you should have to pick your targets carefully.
Why don’t you just ban ganking and force everyone to adopt your morals?
2 Likes
They must be removed from the grid.
1 Like
Why are you so soft on ganking? Concord should -10 people’s sec status for just thinking about a ‘kill’ in high security space. You should be able to do it, but you should have to pick your targets more carefully.
5 Likes
I think CONCORD should ban any player that thinks about killing someone in highsec and CCP should notify the local law enforcement and provide them with the IP address and physical location as to locate and lock up real life sociopaths.
You should be able to do it, but you should have to pick your targets more carefully.
1 Like
I concur. EVE players have no place in a civilized society.
2 Likes
Because that’s too extreme. Banning it should never happen b/c it keeps thing interesting. But having people pop 40m isk haulers from some new bro isn’t something I’d miss. Leave it in the game, but actually make security status matter. If someone ganks a target it should be worth it. IE: cargo’s been scanned, recon has been done, a spy has squealed, etc etc.
Why would I want to ban it? You went to an extreme there when I feel the suggestion being offered is far more middle road and reasonable.
1 Like
Was it worth it?
3 Likes
That logical fallacy is what we call a red herring, which is a rather poor attempt at trolling.
Obviously null security space isn’t what we were discussion, which you know.
“If someone ganks a target [in high security space] it should be worth it,” is the obvious implied meaning.
And, what’s more is that CCP on some level agrees with me otherwise the security rating system wouldn’t even be in the game.
3 Likes
But what of the tears of afk venture pilots? Surely there tears must be worth something?
1 Like
That in itself is a logical fallacy, called “false equivalency.” A game mechanic used to give life to a game with a policing agency that was set up by the Yulai accords to keep capsuleers from completely running amok, as described in game lore, along with the hit to security status (also part of the Yulai accords), is not the same as CCP endorsing or refuting a players actions. Thats what the EULA is for. Don’t collapse in game lore with actual game policy. Please do better in the future, and do your homework.
3 Likes
