That violence has ceased and negotiations have begun is indeed a spark of hope in a dark time. Perhaps, as tensions ease and emotions temper the next few days can be a productive step toward a brighter future.
I commend I-RED for its continuing effort to see past the battlelines and strive for something more, even if we are not always in agreement on what that is.
As a part of the Caldari Militia, is it actually legal to negotiate a ceasefire with the Fed Navy?
Can’t speak for the militia, but we can make initiatives on behalf of our own organization.
Well, that’s just it: as part of the militia, you’re bound by those laws, too.
Respectfully, what laws are you referring to? The ones that let bloodlusty privateers profit off the blood from all sides of this conflict? Or maybe the ones that allow known Provist and Templis terrorists remain in militia ranks?
I-RED has a duty to act to protect the lives and assets of ourselves, our megacorporation, and the State - we are doing just that.
The ones that have the Fed Navy shooting all CalMil pilots in Fed Highsec, regardless of ‘official ceasefire’ announcements.
Our work is not done, as negotiations are still underway regarding a potential prisoner exchange
You took Gallente prisoners?
During several early failed attacks on Ishuk-Raata infrastructure belonging to our subsidiaries within this area of operation, yes.
It has always been the Enforcement Directive’s policy to accept the surrender of any hostile force.
It is also worth noting that prisoners may be taken in any situation that causes a threat to one group or another. This is common of all factions, regardless of most circumstances.
An example would be Gallente criminals taken into custody who placed attacked I-RED personnel in Caldari space, just as I’m sure any Federation-aligned group would take Caldari criminals into custody for the same reasoning.
The prisoners in question do not necessarily have to have been taken into custody during the situation in Intaki.
It has been brought to my attention from a few sources that a gate is currently being constructed in the system of Intaki by the Federation.
What this will mean for the system remains to be seen. I find myself wondering if the people of Intaki were aware. I also find myself wondering exactly where it is this gate may lead, and for what purpose it is being done. Is it to better connect Intaki to the Federation? Is it being done to forcefully connect the system as a way for the Federation Navy to move freely?
This is all speculation, but the situation is increasingly concerning. I thought others may want to know it is there, as I do not see much traffic coming through here anymore, at least around this time of day.
It is indeed a curiosity. The continued silence regarding the situation doesn’t help.
I would prefer to believe that this may be an effort to allow quicker deployment of police, security and naval forces in case of an emergency response so that a standing military presence will be less necessary; a way to accommodate the Intaki Assembly’s preference for a minimal navy presence while rectifying the security risk potential.
I am not ignorant that I am being hopefully optimistic.
DT:125.02.02.10.55.00
OS:GOC//CST15//FN
IR:GLOBAL//FEDEF
MS: FEDERATION ALL SERVICES DEFENSE HQ, INTAKI
MSG BEGINS>>>
ON AUTHORITY OF GALFEDCINC AND FEDMILCOM
DIRECTIVE FOR FEDERATION ALL SERVICES DEFENSE HQ, INTAKI
VIRIETTE SPECIAL MILITARY DISTRICT STATUS AUTHORIZED
SPACE SECURITY AND DEFENSE VIRIETTE DELEGATED FEDMILCOM
BY CONSENT FEDERAL SENATE AND INTAKI ASSEMBLY
SYSTEM SECURITY INCREASED TO CONCORD RATING 0.3
CAPSULEER INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION RIGHTS SUSPENDED
FEDERATION COMBINED SPECIAL TASKFORCE 15 ASSIGNED
FOR GALFEDCINC AND FEDMILCOM
VICE ADMIRAL FORIANA REVELLI
GENERAL OFFICER COMMANDING, COMBINED SPECIAL TASKFORCE 15
FEDERATION NAVY
###MSG ENDS
This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
