OC I do. I responded to a comment and you all piled in to invalidate someone elses opinion because it doesn’t correspond to your own feelings. I don’t need to explain myself to you. CCP can see the drop in their revenue. They will walk it back or lose many many paying customers forever.
1 Like
Is this the state of kids online these days? When someone doesn’t immediately agree with them, they get all butthurt and triggered.
We’re saying your idea is trash because it is. If a group of people are actively working to gatecamp a gate and prevent you from going through, you should not be complaining to CCP to change a ship (giving Interdiction Nullification to Blockade Runners) just so you can go through that one gatecamp.
It shows that you’re selfish, entitled, unable to see beyond how a change to the game’s mechanics would impact everything else beyond your tiny little bubble. That’s why it’s trash.
And here’s the immature threat that we’ve all come to know and love. “Your better support my idea or the game is going to die!” whined the little crybaby.
Not a threat, it’s reality. And its not supporting my idea, it them supporting their own sandbox game the way they created it. I’m not unhappy about the pvp or scams or the things that make eve eve. I am complaining that I don’t want to spend a bunch on play time on something that was previously instant and is just a massive time sink. This isn’t real life and the game really shouldn’t play like real life in absolutely every aspect. Bad design is bad. Bad redesign is worse. Won’t pay.
1 Like
See you, dear. You won’t be missed! <3
Said the last person playing eve as he patted himself on the back for being the most hard core of the internet losers.
1 Like
You’ve already used this “the game will die” threat just 6 minutes ago.
And the log in numbers are reflecting that. Whats your point?
1 Like
Your idea (and your support for this) is trash because it’s selfish, entitled, and does not take into consideration anything beyond your tiny little bubble.
1 Like
round and round and round and rou…
My idea was game play mechanics for over a decade. What an odd perspective you have, to take things away that people have always had then tell them they are entitled when they speak up? Was it entitlement in June of this year, or last, or 2013? No. But it is now for some reason.
1 Like
You seem to have trouble with reading and comprehension.
Let me walk you through where your entitlement lies.
You’re being entitled by supporting the idea that CCP give Interdiction Nullification to Blockade Runners because you feel entitled to safely avoid a gatecamp into other systems beyond it. Like I’ve already said, if people are actively working to gatecamp a system, you should have to put some more effort into breaking that gatecamp apart. You should not be crying to CCP about how they should add Interdiction Nullification to Blockade Runners.
If you’re talking about cyno changes, then again, you’re in the wrong thread for that, kiddo.
“it strikes me as the height of entitlement to assume that a small group of players wielding ships that represent a trivial investment in skillpoints and ISK feel it’s their right to be able to consistently victimize other players whose efforts are backed by hundreds or even thousands of hours and/or corp mates fielding billions of ISK-worth of ships”
Easy to see what side of the argument your on, invalidating everything you accuse others of doing.
1 Like
The answer.
As always, teamwork.
I don’t even know what you’re trying to say here. And your dodging the issue again.
This is all the same issue. That was a quote from a long term players article that better expressed the stupidity of the change and the people that support it.
1 Like
Oh. OK, wow. You have a quote from some other player. Wow. Yeah, that completely changes the issue, let’s give Blockade Runners interdiction nullification because some dude put a quote!
Seeing this thread again gave me a crazy idea: create a T3 shuttle variant with no cargo hold that’s immune to bubbles. Bam, now players have a (relatively) expensive way to get around nullsec that can’t do anything else and is still vulnerable to smartbombs because it’s still a freaking shuttle.
Maybe remove bubble immunity from interceptors while you’re at it, but I don’t know enough to say if that’s a good idea or not.
So I have to nitpick one thing. Why would you ever use the “MWD trick” on a blockade runner? It is designed for ships that cannot covert cloak. You sacrifice align time (because you don’t warp until the MWD cycle is over) for the fact that you can cloak while that alignment occurs. Works great for T1 industrials and DST.
However my agile BR aligns in like 3 seconds so its just align and go.
Although I guess if you are talking about bubbles, then yes getting that 1 cycle of MWD to burn away from danger helps. Just thought about that as I was typing 
1 Like
Ok, so I’ll just go ahead and report your comment for being off topic, since this thread is about Blockade Runners. Trying to abuse reports won’t save you.
Gotta prove yourself right somehow, so go for it spanky.
1 Like