It should not be possible to avoid ship loss in combat by storing your ship in a bowhead

People like you have been asking for “one-more-nerf” for years and years. CCP gives it to you and you come right back and ask for more. Every time you call it an exploit. Oddball stuff that works in your favor is never considered an exploit, though.

3 Likes

It’s sad that CCP needs to introduce nerfs to force “powerful” groups like PIRAT to PVP like men…

1 Like

Cool story bro. Please cite three examples of this. Any examples will do.

2 Likes

CCP has forced almost all PVP out of highsec. They have emptied lowsec by making highsec mining too lucrative (and by introducing jumpfreighters). Pirat is the way it is because that is what the game forces them to be.

2 Likes

Right? It’s almost like hisec is supposed to be high security space or something!

1 Like

They are also moving a lot of nullsec mining into both HS and LS, thereby making wardecs and suicide ganking more relevant.

:point_up_2: this

You and I are going to have so much fun together here on the forums. I can tell already.

2 Likes

As much fun as that sounds, I’m usually too busy playing the game to spend much time here.

1 Like

Well, you are making up for it with the intensity of your tears.

3 Likes

@Lord_Kalus you’ve won this battle. Don’t feed the trolls or they’ll never leave.

We at Advanced Salt Processing V do not make the tears. We make the tears better.

You mean Advanced CCPlease V.

5 Likes

:rofl:

As others have already pointed out while I was realising it myself, changing the way this works might have unintended consequences, such as Orcas not being able to scoop barges that are being suicide ganked, which they can do now if they’re at the keyboard and paying attention…

So I guess CCP would have to either not let barges already being scrambled to dock in the Orca, which I’m sure nobody would come to the forums to complain about, or have to make it work based on whether the ship wanting to dock has a limited engagement, but then that would completely negate a popular form of suspect baiting too…

3 Likes

How can I make the rule benefit only the carebears…

5 Likes

LOL. Sorry but that’s not how it should work. Miners shouldn’t be exempt from any restrictions to docking in space that CCP may deem convenient to apply. You just disqualified anything you may want to suggest in this regard by showing how biased you are.

3 Likes

I just thought about what I wrote. I redact what I said. FML.I keep thinking LS in my head. HS, damn it, HS…

Without changing rules regarding scrams + deposits/swaps for HS vs LS (which is what I was thinking of), no special treatment, agreed.

Even then, I see additional issues. So forget about all that. Major brain hemorrhage there.

HE DIDN’T CATCH ME YET! HA!

THAT TRILLION RADIOACTIVE PIECES
SHOULD ALSO ACT AS TINY SMARTBOMBS!

1 Like

When the ganking process starts …
… the miner has been doing it wrong all along.

He should be warping out as soon as combat ships warp close …
… or there should be someone protecting him, Alpha’ing the catalysts.

The third option, storing your ship in another ship …
… while under heavy fire …
… without consequences for anyone …
… is stupid.

That shouldn’t be a thing for anyone!

1 Like