It should not be possible to avoid ship loss in combat by storing your ship in a bowhead

I know how. Shitpost on the forums more. That will surely fix it.

1 Like

Missed the sarcasm eh?

That is why I suggested Cry and Pout as an alternative, there is no problem, this is a high sec whine.

Just suicide the bowhead or leave high sec?

2 Likes

You’ve made it to reddit!

https://old.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/fvi6e4/debating_mechanics_change_be_all_like_advanced /

1 Like

This is the greatest honor I could hope to achieve in my lifetime!

2 Likes

99% of EVE Community: Hey man, you’re out of toilet paper
@Salt_Foambreaker: use the sand paper
99%: you use sand paper to wipe your ass?
Salt: yeah
99%: huh. I guess the coronavirus pandemic will have people wiping their asses with anything they can get their hands on
Salt: what’s coronavirus?

1 Like

When 2 groups are engaged in combat with each other, we shouldn’t be asking CCP to put more and more restrictions on what is allowed. That smells like heading in a direction where only one form of pvp is legit, and others aren’t.

To me, PIRAT turned a potential loss into victory through innovative use of the mechanics. They won the fight, just not in the “we killed more ISK” way.

So part of me wants to just tip my hat to them and say well played.

At the same time, it’s kind of cheesy that a pointed/scrammed ship, that doesn’t have freedom of movement, has the freedom to be stowed in a bay. That seems wrong, but if they aren’t on an aggression timer, then it should be a perfectly allowed defensive tactic.

3 Likes

And now everyone knows about it and every war can end in a stalemate because both sides are too scared to lose anything to stop parking in a bowhead. Sounds like a healthy place for gameplay to go.

Where are you getting that everyone is too scared?

1 Like

you mean like the kind of carebears who bring neutral bowheads to a fleet fight so they can save their ships in case they start losing?

2 Likes

People that aren’t scared don’t usually hide.

if you’re being warp scrambled you shouldn’t be able to dock in another ship. it is quite simple.

yes it will mean that miners being attacked and scrambled will no longer be able to dock in an orca once the warp scramble has landed. but if they dock quickly before the fight starts then miners can still do this. just not after they come under fire.

it is dumb that a ship under fire can escape by docking into a neutral ship. it’s like having a permanent station for station hugging pvp that you bring with you to escape the consequences of losing.

So all wars involve people hiding?

You don’t seem to be making any sense when your last 2 posts are considered together. If both sides of wars are already hiding, there’s no fight to use a bowhead in.

Can’t you just put your butthurt away for a bit. There’s no need to be all judgemental about playstyles you don’t like, in order to have a conversation.

1 Like

You must be projecting because there is none here. As an alliance that has no assets in space and cannot be wardecced I don’t have a horse in the race. One of these things sounds exploity though, and I don’t think exploits should remain in EVE Online.

Nah, I’m cool with what others want to do. Just reading your posts across a few threads I’ve read, they come across consistently with a tone of underlying butthurt. Maybe you aren’t, but your writing kind of reads that way.

Yeah it kind of does, but if someone isn’t in the fight (ie. no aggression timer), then that doesn’t seem so exploity. Seems like a good defensive option.

Once you start shooting and have a timer, I totally agree, but the game already works like that. No change is needed in that case.

1 Like

You’re projecting butthurt where there is none then. Saying it enough times isn’t going to make it true, that’s not how reality works.

And if neutral logi repping people in a fight without going suspect wasn’t an exploit they would have left that in and unchanged too. Let them dock in bowheads all they want, the bowhead should go suspect if they had any ewar or guns active on them when they do though.

Really the only “exploity” thing about it is that you can’t attack the bowhead without concord getting involved. If they are tackled wartargets and put their ship in a neutral ship, then the neutral ship becoming a legal target seems fair to me as the ship has clearly cast aside their neutrality.

I agree with this. And I agree that it should also apply to mining ships doing the same with orcas. If you’re going to die just suck it up and die.

1 Like

Yes, it should also apply to a neutral orca that docks tackled miner wartargets.

Maybe we have a different understanding of what projecting means. I don’t really care to project anything. It’s just what I’m reading. I don’t seem to be the only one.

But that’s just a side point. Not much I can do other than let you know, which I’ve done.

1 Like

As previously discussed, going suspect/criminal should only happen via actions DIRECTLY performed by you, not actions indirectly facilitated by you but actually performed by your fleetmates. If I do nothing for 30 seconds, I shouldn’t suddenly go suspect in those 30 seconds through no action of my own (other than someone activating a killright on me - sole exception). The scram restriction is less harsh/radical than making Bowhead suspect, so I’m surprised there is so much opposition.