The camper is in a inferior ship and every time he cynos up, he has to decloak. As long as the camper has no risk, the bears are also free of any risk. The moment the camper decides to engage, he is susceptible to the same amount of space pewpew as everyone else.
If you want to get rid of the cloaker, bait him. You do not get to decide when to engage, he does. He buys that advantage with a inferior ship and gives up a high slot for it.
Then what’s your problem with afk cloakers? They should be welcomed content for you, but instead you write the same non-sense whine posts (without reading anything at all about the topic prior to doing so) as the people that want to avoid any and all pvp in nullsec.
And also:
What is the risk to the bear once the camper is no more? Zero, if he’s got even a tiny amount of functional brain cells. The camper isn’t generating any income while he’s camping, whereas the ratters are creating massive amounts of ISK out of thin air, which in turn leads to people crying about inflated plex prices.
If you would have invested any amount of time at all into reading former proposals on how to “fix” afk cloaking, you’d have read quite literally every single counter-argument to your idea there is. It comes up so often that I don’t even bother anymore pointing out why it’s badly thought through and is nothing but crying for perfect safety.
You may or may not realize that, but the only goal that idea would accomplish is make nullsec free of every possible risk.