do you have feed on activity if ALL agents all the time? some agents can go beyond the line , who knows…
yes
James does
Hahaha I thought you guys could improve after many years after Aiko took over, but looks like you are trapped in the same old and rusty RP still.
essentialy, you want the game that suit you for your own profit
And don’t try to replay with “i am not alone here, other have bla bla bla” because, you are alone in this crap
You dont get a choice just like everyone you gank.
Freighters were about back then around 2010ish last time I played and had one
Free trials not full on Alpha not the same
No actually this tear duct salt farming wasnt prevalent last time I played it was about kills and fights
Not really interested in your shoes TBH 
They are exploiting the game mechanics which is no different than what the bot cheates do.
No. Exploiting means doing things not intended by the developers. Being an outlaw is 100% intended gameplay, and the separation between Crimewatch mechanics and Standings mechanics is also very much intended. There may be upcoming revisions, but that doesn’t make current gameplay styles exploits.
Its an exploit because you all exploit the game mechanic to get the gank. Why do you think so many have asked CCP to lower the response time of concord? Its because someone figured out how to exploit the response time to get the gank. That means, CCPS intended game mechanic to deal with the criminals no longer works because of the exploit.
1 Like
No, if it was an exploit it would be in the Known and Declared Exploits list. Understanding how a mechanic works and using it legally (by game rules) is not the same as exploiting a mechanic that is behaving not-as-intended.
Evading CONCORD would be an exploit. Attacking with enough ships to kill a target before CONCORD arrives and said ships are lost is simply doing the math and accepting the declared cost of taking the action.
CCP’s intended response to criminal acts is Crimewatch. Avoiding Crimewatch is not allowed. Being OK with receiving the effects of Crimewatch and proceeding to break the ‘law’ is acceptable gameplay per CCP’s own rules.
Right, simply doing the math to exploit the game mechanic and you win at EVE. Sounds real risky, I can see why you gankers get mad when other people that, don’t even play you playing style, want to add more risk to the gankers.
I am not a ganker. Your entire premise for decrying my statements is based on a flawed belief that the only people who would consider it not being an exploit is gankers - and yet, non-gankers agree that using the game mechanics in ways explicitly permitted by the rules, not just the mechanics is not an exploit.
Also, gankers are not winning at EVE. The only way to win EVE is to not play.
2 Likes
My bad if you truly aren’t a ganker. I still stand by what I said excluding you.
Of course they would think that its not an exploit. They know that it they do X that it will result in Y. Its lazy game play to earn isk which is one of the reason CCP used to nerf (changed the game mechanics) the hell out of mining and ratting.
In 2003 concord could be fought off by the gankers…
And concord were slower to respond.
And gankers got paid for losing their ship.
And killrights weren’t public.
What are you even trying to pull here?
The ‘non’ from ‘non-gankers’ is incredibly relevant to my statement. Excluding it means your response make no sense. It is poorly quoted at best, and horribly dishonest at worst.
Ganking is not an exploit. Period. There is zero wiggle in that, as CCP determines what is or is not an exploit and declares them accordingly. Ganking has literally been around since the beginning of the game, and while many mechanics have been changed, CCP has never indicated that ganking is a mechanic that should not exist. They have even overhauled the entire crimewatch system since game launch, increasing the penalties for ganking but not in any way indicating that ganking should not happen.
1 Like
Find any real life high security area and try to walk in with a gun. Or grab a pencil, put it up over your head and start running toward some random person’s back who is across the room.
My question is: What’s so hard to understand about the fact that “high security space” is NOT high security at all? Just because its SAFER than null or low security DOES NOT mean its HIGH security. Its more like “the projects”.
Like the US Capitol maybe?
EVE is 20000 years in the future. Go back even 150 years ago and cultural norms and laws were far different to now.
20000 years in the future doesn’t need to be measured at all by current RL norms and there’s no chance, assuming the human race still exists, that the culture and laws will be the same then as they are now. There’s nothing RL about us flying space ships around in a watery filled universe.
That’s not a fact, because if we are to stick to facts, then only fact we have is that it is high security, because that’s what it’s called.
By any measure, the mechanics are the most restrictive/punitive in highsec compared to any other security region of New Eden.
Of course suicide-ganking is an exploit. It is an illegal act in real life, and doing it in the game is against the law, so players are exploiting a lack of enforcement by real-life authorities in order to get away with these vile actions. Just because you are in a game, does not mean that you should be able to get away with real-life criminal acts. The fact that CCP allows people to get away with this instead of enforcing the law as necessary means that they need to be prosecuted under the full extent of international law, like the viking scumbags that they are.
5 Likes
OMG. Who told you that was a high security area? There are high security areas WITHIN it though, and that explains why no Senator was dragged out of there.