No, you tell us the calculus. The same way I did.
Because so far you still believe that the 7th painter has a 3% stacking penalty - while it does not.
52 painters give < +333% sig radius. Not +900% that are required. Almost the exact same value as the 8th. Also the same value as 10000 painters would give.
you could do by yourself if you want ā¦ ! but you only want to beliefe in alternate facts !
you said it by yourself !
The burden of proof is on you.
I literally said the opposite :
Repeating the same lies wonāt make them true. I said itās not.
You are a liar when you pretend I said the exact opposite of what I actually literally said.
Thatās what happens when you pretend you know things that you have no idea about.
You mathematically canāt reach 100% application with painters, web, rigs, whatever using rage torps on a golem vs all frigates. even the 50m which are the biggest, you canāt.
you said by yourself what i calculated 
so if iĀ“m a liar then youre also a liar ā¦ !
you want to be so smart but cant proof iĀ“m wrong ? we only have to trust your words ? your word is not a proof of anything !
No I did not.
Also you are a liar, you did not calculate that.
You just quoted me out of context, which makes you a double liar.
The burden of proof is on you. You claim you can, but canāt prove it - because you know you are wrong.
you didnt know what your written ? ā¦ thats very bad
who said that ? you ? why i have to beliefe you ! why you dont show us your calculation to proof iĀ“m wrong ? if you cant then you never proof anything and nobody need to beliefe in you !
and you claimed you have ā¦ but you havent ! i have nothing to proof
so ā¦ unless you didnt show anything to proof your correct ā¦ your the biggest liar on the forum and just want to discredit anyone else only to show youre correct but you arent !
you cant know because you didnt 
and if you did you did it wrong because you say by yourself :
I know I wrote the opposite of what you claim.
It is NOT 3% for the 7th. It is less.
You did when showing a screen of my own post and removing the things that prove you are wrong.
Indeed, you are wrong.
I literally said it was not.
but we all can see you had it written ?
and btw ā¦ if its not 3% for the 7th then show us the source where did you get that !
but your answer will be " no i dont want to show you " ā why ? because you cant !
i just quote you i didnt removed anything from your post ā¦ just showing the quote !
then proof iĀ“m wrong xD but you cant otherwise you would because you think youre the smartest one !
but why did you write it if its wrong ? maybe you dont know what youre talking ?
You can see I wrote itās less.
If you canāt, then you are wrong.
I also gave the source in that post.
But the formula are too complex, you canāt understand them.
You removed the part where I say itās not 3%. which is the opposite of your claim.
The burden of proof is on you.
I wrote the opposite You are a liar, only YOU wrote it.
scroll up to post 48 and see what you have written there ā¦ xD
but you want us to beliefe you didnt write it ? but why is it in your post ?
eve uni ? only seen up to the 6th module quote your own statement if you had a source for the 7th+ module then maybe we can beliefe you ā¦ otherwise youre the liar and not me xD
i didnt remove anything ! i just didnt quote it ! but i also didnt quote a lot of youre ā ā ā ā ā¦ and still your post below is 6th, 7th and 8th module are 3% ā¦
no its not why did you beliefe this ? you want me to proof that im wrong but still at this time you hadnt proofed xD
we all can see that you didnt wrote the opposite xD as i quotet a few times xD we all know that youre the liar and you cant proof anything
i can only repeat ā¦ you said otherwise ā¦ and everyone can see it !
then proof me wrong xD but you didnt ā¦ so you cant ā¦ so youre the liar !
removing is not the same then quote not everything your a liar
and you have said this xD as we all can show based on your table
then whats this ? your alternate facts ?
i just calculatet based on your basement and you said iĀ“m wrong ā¦ if iĀ“m wrong then your wrong if youre corrct then iĀ“m correct xD
it only means you dont know what you said ā¦ xD
What does this sentence mean ?
Donāt try to avoid your errors.
your a liar and you dont know what youre even write in your posts below !
I wrote itās NOT 3%.
so you want to denied that you write this ?
Indeed, I wrote itās NOT 3%
You are a liar.
then youre realy a liar because its written in your post ā¦ xD i will quote it again if you havent seen it 
actualy i dont quote ! i cratet a screenshot with a red circle around YOUR DATA maybe you see this better then a quote of your written text xD
No itās not . What is written is that itās not 3%.
then why did you post this if its wrong ? maybe you cme up with your alternate facts ?
and everyone can see you had written it
Why not ? Again, what does it change ? How does it matter ?