Well all the votes are in, we just wait for the results.
Thank you to all that voted and to those who participated in the discussions here and in other venues.
A HUGE thanks to the people who ran interviews to give us a chance to get out there and show who we are.
Best of luck to the other candidates . . .
m
fixed, in my defense it was typed pre coffee
m
Typos happen so wouldn’t worry about it, just mentioned it as the result was funny. 
I am asking all CSM candidates this question
Fighting against toxicity is a strong case, as it comes with the territory of gaming -everywhere-
However. How would you handle a hypothetical stalemate wherein both parties are believe the other to be toxic, but only one party can really be telling the truth.
But then again, truth is based on the perspective of the perceiver.
How would you handle this?
Is there a reason why you are asking AFTER the polls have closed? I mean it is not actually relevant to the campaign now, is it?
But to the question.
I disagree. Both can be toxic. Watch two drunks having an argument and you will soon see what I mean. So your premise is off.
m
Watching two drunks have an argument can be just as amusing though.
I have my reasons.
This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.