And instead of ticking it has high sec music, progressing to combat music in the last 10% of the time set.
1 Like
Yeah, pretty much all AFK-cloaky campers bio read: “pay me isk to not be here”
pretty sure they not gonna be changing bio, just install scripts or set a timer.
perhaps maybe… they change to “pay me isk to not troll you’re observatories” who knows… exciting times etc etc not.
I don’t think it’s particularly cool meta, but to answer the question… again.
AFK cloaky campers are already botting and once in a blood moon, they are actually caught and then get’s unbanned because there is no evidence. As have happend already.
FYI, I was referring to “why would anyone shoot at them when they come to null sov”.
we all know they are peaceful explorers, that don’t do any PVP, and that they help out a bunch of people.
tl;dr Offtopic.
Also, i find it quite hilarious that you start your offtopic discussion with:
“omg how will signal cartel survive with the cloak fuel idea lol… you don’t think of everyone… blblalbalba”
and now you say they operate in all known space+wh but don’t live in wh.
So your argument “signal cartel would like this cus they pop out of a wh and are unable to cloak all of a sudden because they landed in sov null” is hilarious.
as you just stated they don’t even live in wh, they will have plenty of opportunities to restock their cloakfuels. as they travel across the entire eve universe etc… and you know, they are able to go back into the wh they came from and cloak up.
tl;dr.
Cloakfuel = It’s up to the pilot to make decisions that matter.
it is not forced upon you by a short artificial timer.
you can explore as much as you want in dangerous space, you just have to make a decision when you should activate your “safety bubble” as it’s limited.
pro tip; use one batch of cloak fuel to scan everything down while you pass the system, go refuel, go back to actually do the hacking.
pro tip whilst you using a probe scanner uncloaked - also use d-scan and look for any type of probes. this makes you almost invulnerable
@Wadiest_Yong @Gerard_Amatin @MB_ThePhotographer @Xeux
if you can’t manage to engage in the topic discussion and instead discuss people, then you have no reason to be here. Also, i might add, you’re being internet bullies.
tl;dr
Please take your issues elsewhere, this thread is not the place for them.
May I recommend redit?
… and you’re trying to take the high ground… lol
1 Like
my snarky remarks are intertwined regarding the topic discussion.
I don’t single out any specific person.
I don’t make any “hit and run” trash talk post’s
I don’t try to meme the topic.
I don’t try to have an offtopic discussion as an last resort measure to bury the other’s post I don’t agree with.
I’m not even trying to take the high ground, but when all the rest is taking such a gutter approach to eve forums, it might seems i do… lol
The topic is about the upcoming introduction of ‘Mobile Observatories’, so when you talk about adding cloak fuel you’re going off topic. The player suggestion forum is elsewhere.
Yes, the topic is about the SUGGESTED new game mechanics.
And the feedback is its going to be exploited by botters and also how the new “non botting” afk-cloaky meta will look like. And how you win the isk war by logging out.
(aka egg timers - soon in eve merch store?).
as ive said earlier:
When i stated that this observatory was bad for many many reasons, and it was mearly an empty geasture from ccp when they claim it to “remove afk cloaks”.
… I didnt want to come off as an anti-cloak cry-baby “whiner” (but i was called one anyways).
So i’m (not really) sorry if i also wanted to give ccp some constructive advise in the feedback forum.
in the way of me explaining how a cloak fuel is far supierior to anything that i can think of / have previously been suggested.
so… go ahead call out “offtopic” all you want, its not. Its feedback.
The topic, whether you understood that or not, is the mobile observatories that ARE going to be implemented, not every other creative solution.
So yes, your off-topic and your approach to this thread deserve the opposition you receive, especially after your 93 posts of repetition.
Do you speak for ccp?
How do you know it is going to be implemented as is?
I found that very unlikley. as its a bad mechanic that would involve more GM time beeing spent … and also quite bad for the game.
Also… lol.
“after my 93 post of repetion” … you actully counted them all… lol.
PS
“how to troll the trollers and getting your massage out about the CLOAK FUEL IDEA IS THE ONLY RIGHT PATH FORWARD”
Thank you for coming to my ted talk.
Nope, there’s a counter under the original post.
aww, but then you don’t know if all my 90+ posts are a repetition… 
so you lie, when you say:
I have been talking about this cloak-fuel for 90 posts.
I have not talked that much about the cloak-fuel game mechanic change even thou it would truly be a goodgame change. and far supierior to the observatory idea.
nah mate… sorry, i haven’t said that the cloak-fuel would help eve become more fun, vibrant and fair… 90 times.
LOL Seriously? Because the 37k losses they have suffered, many of which are in null would beg to differ.
I would bet that more “peaceful explorers” make regular use of cloaking modules than do PVP hunters. So yea your topic of wanting to make fundamental changes to the cloak module is quite on topic.
Bullies!!! 
It’s not fair! 
Do you undock in game? Posting on the forums is just like undocking in game. You consent to having your idea’s critiqued. I would leave you alone if you had said your peace and be done with it. But no, you have to keep harping on an old idea that’s as bad now as it was then. I have no problem with an effective way to get rid of afk cloaking. Yours is not original nor effective without buggering other types of gameplay.
Greedy entitled children these days… 
3 Likes
He isn’t just trying to get rid of AFK cloaking, that’s the problem. He wants to stop cloaky camping altogether. I think it’s pretty obvious to anybody who’s read more than a couple of his posts that all he’s really concerned about is his ability to farm safely in null sec. Cloakers are an inconvenience to that way of life so he’s wanting them nerfed enough to be completely ineffective (personally I think this structure already does that). There seems to be little understanding or concern for other playstyles or the nature of the game. I miss the days everybody would just say HTFU or go back to high sec, which should be the appropriate response to a desire for risk free grinding in the pvp area of the game.
1 Like
Those people were all banned from the forums.
2 Likes
I know that. I was just trying to be nice for ISD Batman’s sake.
3 Likes
Well done CCP, something that makes me interested in Eve again. If this is not too expensive, I will likely head back to NPC nullsec and use it.
Thank you for your explanation Brisc, it made things a lot clearer.
1 Like
Hi, what is the cost of this thing likely to be, can it be re-deloyed. Or is it going to be something like that D-scan inhib which is way more expensive than it should be and one use only?
Sorry as clarification and I can’t add it to the above post.
I ask because belt ratting is something that I would like to do again if this thing actually hits the live server and I am worried that if it is made one use or too expensive it will be a like the D-scan inhib which is only used by a certain multi-boxing JF ganker in Jita because he can afford it.
Can you push on this because you want people using these things when they are looking to do low return belt ratting in nullsec for example which tend to get blocked off by large nullsec alliances that wish to control what they see as their space and they do it the lazy way.