Mobile Structure spam in Jita needs to be addressed

[Cade_Windstalker]

@Miss_Stardust

I ALSO RECALL a time where intentionally creating lag was a ban-able offense. The proliferation of structures in Jita creates a metric crapton of lag.

It still is, but that’s the intentional creation of lag by a single individual. There’s no single group or individual spamming mobile structures in Jita, it’s just the combination of a ton of individuals combined.

[Anderson_Geten]

what if the “anchoring” skill allowed to you deploy +3 anchorable items (MTU, bubble, MD, MJD, inhibs) , with a base of 1 ?
=> max 3*5+1 = 16 deployables per toon.

[Archer_en_Tilavine]

I find this idea to be patently offensive.

[Cade_Windstalker]

@Anderson_Geten

what if the “anchoring” skill allowed to you deploy +3 anchorable items (MTU, bubble, MD, MJD, inhibs) , with a base of 1 ?
=> max 3*5+1 = 16 deployables per toon.

I bet if you go through and check the owner of every anchorable object on the Jita undock you won’t find that any one person owns more than this as it is.

[Anderson_Geten]

I see literally zero right now at jita undock . WTF ? Now I can’t even believe that the improvement was due to the bug fix…

Or maybe THAT was the bug fix …

/me is shocked