I agree. He’s been making a complete donkey of himself but is too dense to comprehend and too foul to quit.
Ban 
3 Likes
Resorting to decade old post to avoid accountability today wow.
So sad.
Guess I’ll have to fire up the laptop and put in a ticket relevant to the times rather than board line stalky posts from almost a decade ago.
I used to play the first cyberpunk MMO… It failed because of the same reasons. The GM’s actually got to the point where if I killed the same person too many times they would literally come talk to me about griefing others. That’s cancer. The game is dead.
I think a recurring issue on the internet, across forums and games, is that there are fundamentally two groups of people. Group A whines and complains a lot. They frequently report others, making up exaggerated claims of harassment and bullying. Group B is the opposite. They endure endless toxicity over years, rarely reporting the behavior, and trying their best to maintain their own good behaviour. What happens is Group A reports Group B, and Group B does not report Group A. The moderators thus see numerous reports against Group B, and few reports against Group A, leading to the erroneous conclusion that Group B is the problem. This is why I have begun reporting some of the more egregious conduct, such as that displayed here, because there comes a point when something really does need to be said. Myself, and the people in my alliance and channel, are neither cyberbullies nor griefers. The actual cyberbully, and the actual griefer, is the individual right here in this thread, the one that all of you are quite sick of. There’s the bad actor.
4 Likes
And of course group C who deliberately antagonises people in and out of the game and then plays victim takes umbrage , cry’s harassment, twists humour as serious insults and resorts to using decade old post in a vague attempt to dodge accountability.
You have taken this and other posts off topic to this end and have done nothing productive to the discussion of the OP other than push your poor trolling attempts and ego on everyone yet again . Frankly I’m bored at your repeated attention seeking and narcissism. Not every post is all about you ! People were having a decent discussion, once again you and your chums have to come and ruin that with the attention seeking it’s sad and I feel sorry for you .
Any further comment from you will be ignored as it is in game .
Test my idea here… This is what I think will happen. Some moderator will come along and he will plug this entire thread into AI and he will ask hopefully for a neutral opinion on the subjects. Try this you will see exactly what I mean. What you will find is that the vast majority of people in this thread and everything they say has been dismissed and the only concern is once again this dude and the victim he is playing. That’s the difference between actually playing the game and being involved… And being CCP. I do believe that’s what the moderator will do unless he is specifically using his own in-game predispositions. The AI completely dismissed every factual bit of evidence that the gankers gave in this thread. It didn’t even look at anything no evidence at all. It only cared about this guy playing a victim. It doesn’t care about the hundreds of people that he is harassing in game or the fact that the leader of this group is literally speaking about it from the highest position possible to have all information. By the way you’re completely right about the systemic cancer that kills games. I’ve watched it happen over and over again for almost 30 years now.
Tbh non of that would have been needed if folk could stick to topic and use rational and respectful discourse instead of trolling and attention seeking .
Been using the forum only a few months and it’s sad to see
And if any of you are really familiar with AI… You know that you can then ask the AI to clearly look over the post and review its information to make sure it’s correct with its views on the gankers… And then it will miraculously change exactly what it said before… Anything to make the viewer happy in the most general way possible along the lines of how it’s programmed to speak and only the most superficial way possible so as to not use any tokens. I don’t think it understands the difference between AOL chat rooms and PVP games… One is dead the other is trying to survive.
Shut up cage, go to your room. we’re discussing the link between the game dying and ganking. Annoying…
Such humor you have. There hasnt been any decent discussions here. The discussion here could be constructive except the fact that with all your replies…you continually revert back to the same itch that you cannot scratch and thats Aikos channel, websites…and above all…ganking.
You cant accept people that dont agree with you. The people in this thread that are gankers, that are suspect hunters, that are people that love to engage in back ally acts that just seem to interrupt the pve player…acts that you think arent justified in a game that allows it…that now you have labeled cyber bullying.
How can you expect for people to stay on whatever topic you attempted to corral here to stay on topic when you keep reverting back to the same made up jibberish that you cant seem to let go of. Its as you sir are in the wrong game…and have been for a long time.
Its not Aikos…or anybody else’s fault that find their own content in this game and becomes lucrative at it. Perhaps if you shut up and listen, you could learn from the very people you speak negatively against and find new ways to enjoy the game. Learn from the people that supposedly causes you so much grief and turn it around and be lucrative at it as well. Are you going to be a miserable person from here on out? You really want to be the person that everybody on these boards laughs at on a daily basis?
2 Likes
Here is what my ChatGPT had to say…
On the principal policy question, the pro-ganking side is closer to the evidence: there is no adequate basis here for eliminating suicide ganking or blaming it for EVE’s population problems. On the narrower conduct question, Kage espouses a valid general principle — PvP does not excuse harassment — but he overgeneralizes it, supplies insufficient evidence, and repeatedly violates his own proposed standard of respectful discourse.
3 Likes
I like that thank you. I pulled up a completely fresh thread using Google and told it to be neutral and fair.
I recall one time we went to destroy a structure and there were 7 Paladins parked outside, each of which was worth more than the structure. Collectively they likely could have wiped out our 20 man fleet of Drekavacs and logi Guardians, but they all just fled and we destroyed the structure.
This is the sort of thing that then gets marked down as ‘bullying small corps’…yet they had more than enough firepower to deal with us.
I am Kernite. You know that exact scenario is one of the reasons I attack multiboxing and war hqs at the same time. Like you know those paladins were just one guy and the only thing that he was capable of doing is sitting there at zero and pressing a button. If he had to move away from that station it would be an absolutely different story. One single warp and he would have lost everything, ships and cit. I’ll bet you the idiot was sitting at zero on the undock wasn’t he… I’ll bet you he couldn’t even fly around that station for any kind of proper range… I wonder why he chose to fly away tbh. I just had a crazy thought. I don’t think these guys could handle just you and I in a fleet together. Just a thought. It’s a convenient thing for the world around us that the people speaking in these channels prefer Independence. Where there’s smoke there’s fire… Highsec is its own endgame. Maybe I’ll put in some real work for the Boss.
Ah chat GPT and Ai images, I suppose you may well have added “make them look bad and me look good” on the end. It’s akin to googling “tell me why I’m right”
How pathetically off topic have you dragged us all now eh.
Separate subject but I find myself agreeing with you on this one, it sounds clearly like a miss match in experience levels rather than bullying for sure.
Out of interest did you explain to them their folly after ? Doing so may well have upped the challenge level of any subsequent encounters with the same people . That would definitely be a more positive form of aftermath feedback 
Let me do it for you… How many guardians did the fleet of 20 have? Was it three or four? I would have split damage between targets until they messed up and I would have killed all 20 of you… Or enough that you would have warped away
There has, just not with you .
Arthur and Gerrard seem to have the knack for it perhaps you can ask them for advice ?
Shut up cage you’re interrupting people talking. And not only that you’re having delusions. If this were an episode of cops I’d be worried to take any handguns out of the place for you live.
Perhaps limit the responses to one post instead of 6 off topic posts ?
How about stop pretending like you have any control over what I’m doing. You are the original post… The op. You are not the moderator so shut up
You’re like a 3-year-old throwing a temper tantrum. I’m going to have to put you back on block brother. I’m sorry man I’ll try again some other time