My contribution to the "Highsec Lobby" initiative

Holy crap, that reminds me of a TotalBiscuit video (rest in peace :sob:) where he was ranting about someone calling him an elitist for suggesting they use a strategy guide for World of Warcraft (I think). The rant was pretty good, in my opinion, though I can’t find it ATM. Have a tweet instead:

You know, I honestly wouldn’t care if you were James 315 because you seem perfectly reasonable and willing to explain things to people who want to learn.

…take your damn like and get out.

In light of the knowledge that Dracvlad supports stealing from gank victims, I hereby propose that he be banned from the AG channel as a toxic influence.

Dare I ask who this guy is, that his very name inspires such fear?

I don’t believe it works that way. The only thing I know of that will get that kind of response from CCP is using a charity to scam people.

Quoth CCP Falcon: “Anyone who uses charity as an excuse in any way shape or form to scam someone in EVE can say goodbye to every account, character and item they own, along with any chance they have of ever playing EVE again in future.”

Since loyalanon never went anywhere close to that far, I doubt they have to worry about getting their other accounts banned if CCP figures out which ones they are, presuming they don’t already know.

Even if your theory is true, we don’t know why AE is denying it. The first reasonable explanation that comes to mind would be avoiding harassment from people who want to rag on him for something that, A: he’s already been punished for, and B: happened in 2016. Another reason could be due to meta-roleplaying each individual character as their own individual.

Whatever the reason, I doubt it’s because he’s afraid CCP will smash his character with the banhammer should this theory be confirmed.

2 Likes