At some point you should probably think about what problem you actually try to solve here.
1 Like
If this comes with some restrictions on what those with less than 50 members can do then I would agree with you and find it doable.
I mean corporation COULD choose that option. To not be wardeccable for 50 members. But they could go and wardec other larger corporations in any minute and that would make them wardecable in return until the wars ended or they surenderred. Space guerilla.
My dear boy, Ima said it in general, never mentioned hisec so this should help:
It is all about strategic reasons my dear boy, do try to keep up, and that is what my proposal is all aboutā¦
Yeah but we where talking about wardecs and that is really only relevant in highsec.
1 Like
I have a new job for CCP, to finally write, redact and publish the Yulai Convention text.
So you make a general statement that has no merit when I am suggesting a strategic change to structures in hisec that create a reason, do keep up, or shut up! And that applies to your lap dog too.
Let me reapt it so you get it, no mention of hisec:
Your comment is aboutr structure warfare in general when I am proposing to tie war decs above 4 in number to a concord agent in a citadel. I read your comment as in general about structure warfare and as a strategic objective they get destroyed, hisec will now have a strategic value. If you cannot get that then there is no hope for you!
Yes. The whole issue is only with high-sec obviously. And Iām disliking how those who want to create wars are being already restricted by cost and people wanting to add more restrictions to it.
War has never been pretty and trying to make it pretty is just absurd.
Wasnt cheap either. 
Heres an idea, leave them alone. Just make structures easier to kill to provide more content for deccers, more reason to fight back for deccees. That will lead to more people playing the game as intended, interacting with each other, new corps being made and some broken along with possible upheavals of standing groups leading to changes of the political landscape.
No, not necessarily. A quick surrender can be very cheap. The cost should ideally only be the loss of ships and structures so that those who produce perfect wins can come out with no cost and only loot.
Wow, seriously what is your problem?
I said tying structures to wardecs is ā ā ā ā because killing structures is in my opinion boring because it has three timers and it drops nothing. Maybe its super interesting in null, but I really donāt care since we are talking about wardecs here which is something that only makes sense in highsec.
1 Like
You are deliberately being dumb, like dum dum, the thing is that I am tying in the ability to do more than 4 war decs to a citadel. It becomes more than what you are complaining about as I said, it becomes a strategic objective just like those in nullsec which is a base of operations, do keep up, engage brain, and answer with brain engaged.
I was thinking, maybe lets just tell CONCORD to see what is the generl wealth of the corporations and those who are in certain class could not wardec the lower class corps. Sort of corp ranking system.
I get the idea, but it is so not EVE. EVE is still a sandbox game and as such should anything be possible, at least ideally and theoretically.
If you let, say, allow a corporation to fight anyone above their rank and anyone below them up to 10 ranks lower, just as an example, then this also means that the top-ranked corporation can only fight at most 10, because they only are allowed to fight at most 10 lower ranked ones and otherwise have nobody above them. This means the top-ranked corporation has less options than those in the middle.
Ideas like these just make me itch. They seem right on the first sight, but then it reeks of control and regulation and limitation that nobody is going to have any fun in the end.
Allow players to chase the perfect dream. Let them aim for total dominance and let them be as bad and evil as they can be.
Man what is wrong with you? I even wrote that to Whitehound and not to you. This was not about your idea. with the office but about making structure bashing a part oft wardecs because I think thatās ā ā ā ā and removes another game mechanic for casual players who donāt have the time to bash structures.
4 Likes
When people just resign without fight, that is not fun either. But you got a right impression it would be not made by CCP. CCP is all about non-balance. 
The war mechanics is the stuff that is iike Kestrels that could fit torpedo launchers. Just fixing that was a lot easier than fixing war mechanic.
It is not fun for anyone when a war target bails out and falls back into an NPC corporation. Most aggressors no longer care and they choose the spam method as this produces the desired result. The problem really is that we have too many corporations, but not enough willing to participate in corporate warfare. And this is because players donāt want to hang out in NPC corporations forever, but they want to be part of an organization (aka guild, corp, gang, etc.), which not necessarily takes part in high-sec warfare. This is whatās missing and I donāt see why we still havenāt gotten it yet.
There was some talk about social corps before, but nothing was made I think towards that.
Even lapsing to NPC corp that you would choose would be nice addition to the system I think, for RP reasons.
1 Like
Acting as if you are the victim again: Blame your lap dog, but still this is a general statement.
I pointed out that structures are blown up in nullsec for strategic reasons and if they have a specific strategic value in hisec in terms of having a concord agent that allows more than 4 war decs then they will be attacked for strategic reasons.
And your lap dog said this:
so I replied this:
and this
To lap dog and you said this:
My suggestion is about placing a CONCORD agent in a citadel to allow more than 4 war decs, you made a statement that there is no value in blowing up citadels never said hisec, but there is strategic value in nullsec which is why they get blown up, so if you add the strategic value in hisec as per my suggestion then they will be blown up.
Rather easy to understand unless you are trying to be dense, or you have your head in a dark brown place. 