You are AGAIN avoiding the question, like you’ve always been doing.
So now I believe you just plainly lack the economical knowledge to understand what is an activity, and what is economical value.
Indeed, this is wrong.
You are plainly wrong here.
And the reason is : prove it. Prove that the investment was based on a valid use case. So far you’ve not proven it, you only claim it is - but what is asserted without a proof, is dismissed without a proof.
I’m telling they are only in your head. I’m telling if someone has the knowledge of how to make money, they keep it for themselves or make people pay more than it is worth to gain that knowledge.
Why bother responding then? Why are you here? There is nothing I can say to you about what you believe. I guess I will just continue earning money without taking onboard what you say since it clearly does not fit in with reality and it is in no way a true depiction of what actually happens and it’s not what people believe about BTC.
So that’s a no then is it? lol. Are you smarter than some of the brightest minds in the world? may I have a yes or no answer please?
Your problem is that your belief on this involve you ignoring EVERYTHING EVERYONE says to you which is extremely unhealthy, I have nothing to prove, and your convo is toxic.
I don’t need to give you an answer you want to read, You’ll only get factual answers from me I’m afraid. Ones which comply with reality. As I mentioned, the smartest minds in the world have looked at BTC and they are happy. If you’re not happy you should write a letter to them and explain your issue.
And there is nothing you can answer to what I ask, and THAT is the problem.
You can keep pretending you are making money, yes.
But repeating a lie several times won’t make it a truth.
You are avoiding the question to start with. None of your answers so far actually answer the question I’ve repeated several times.
Go dodge the question and pretend you answered it somewhere else. Until you actually answer that question, all your claims about you gaining money are only driven by your ignorance.
A problem for you maybe because your goal of making people say what you want them to say regarding BTC will never be realised. Not a problem for me however, I purchased lots of hardware based on the belief it would earn me money after electric is paid. That has happened successfully for a long time, it does what it says on the tin. i have no complaints and I am very happy with the rate at which I have repaid debts.
Why do I need to pretend? I’m fully aware that the BTC value could go down as well as up, and the large investment I made in hardware is risky.
Feel free to think I am lying, I have a feeling though that what you say is not based on anything much since you’ve have zero experience of mining crypto and your narrative seems more important to you than actual fact.
I have an answer to your question, but as I said it is not one you wish to read or understand so I won’t bother and will again refer you to some of the smartest minds in the world who have already answered your question 1000s of times over.
The answer won’t suddenly change just because you’re asking again and again. The answer will stay the same for eternity.
The FACT is that you can’t answer to a simple economical question. You don’t know what is the value you add by mining BTC. Every value you proposed before is worse in BTC than in other currency system. And when people try to find a workaround, it’s at the price of removing another thing, therefore making it even worse.
THAT is fact. There is no legal economical value in BTC.
As such, if you are paid, it’s either for non-value activity (aka a scam), or for illegal value (laundering)
I don’t know/care. All I know is, you do.
Liar. So far each time you pretend you do, you don’t.
Walk me through how you came to your conclusions about BTC, let me know your sources of information and what experience you’ve had with BTC. thanks. You can agree that when someone is assessing something they have a set process they follow and they create/use examples of the subject in question right? or is this concept also foreign to you?
For example if I was assessing computer games, it might actually help if I had a copy of the game in question so that I could play it and get a good idea of what it’s about. Do you agree that there is a method used when assessing anything?
I will assume you don’t have a set process for assessing BTC since you didn’t answer me or gave no reasoning why you couldn’t answer. Therefore however you came to your conclusions is most likely wrong.
Playing silly games with me won’t help you on this matter at some point you will have to be real with yourself and get some examples of the subject. So all I can say to you is use your gaming machine to mine for a couple of days and see what you find.
Buy $10 worth of BTC and hold onto it. make a note of what happens to it and use the experience to revise your opinion.
You must realise how silly you seem with your opinion “BTC is a scam cos i say it is” join the adult way of talking and consider facts.
Or not. You are again completely dodging the question. You can gamble, win money. You can gamble, win nothing but believe you won something.
Those OPINIONS that you are winning something are irrelevant. Learn to use fact and logic, kid.
It’s not logic because you failed to tell me how you arrived at your conclusion and when i asked you if you’re aware that there is a method for assessing a subject you ignored me and didn’t even acknowledge that I asked you a question.
You certainly aren’t using a logical process since you can’t even explain it to me. I can write for hours explaining in great detail the process I used to asses BTC and crypto mining, If you’re so smart how come you cannot do the same?
Exactly, you have no core experience of BTC or crypto to draw upon and on this matter you don’t seem to want experience, you’ll struggle to talk extensively on this matter.
I’m a straight forward no nonsense sort of person, I can assure you that I tell it exactly as I see it. If I say I am doing better financially then I am.
You take care now, and go easy on yourself ok man.
Except it’s unrelated. I never claimed I do care about BTC. I claim, that NFT are a scam, and BTC is only useful for speculation or laundering. Which is what you’ve been dodging.
You are ignorant of the basics of economy, so your opinion on that topic is completely useless.
That you dodge the questions when the answer would show you are wrong.
Actually that’s exactly what you’ve done in your example.
So yes, you should learn what logic actually is instead of what you want it to be.
That’s irrelevant, because you use the definition of A logic (A system of inference) for the general ability to make inferences based on logic rules .
For example, your example is actually illogical, that is it does not follow a set of rules to deduce the result you gave. I don’t need to give A specific logic, to show that your example is not logical.
Not at all, I followed a process when attempting to understand nicehash and the hardware needed to earn money from it. I did as I was directed which resulted in me earning from crypto mining. If I had ignored any part of my learning process I wouldn’t be in a position to successfully mine crypto and earn.
Any other conclusion based on it NOT being the child who marked up the wall would be illogical. because nobody marked the wall and if nobody marked the wall how come marks are there?
Not considering all aspects of a subject will result in odd conclusions.
What I don’t consider valid, is your interpretation.
And ye,s you are dodging the point again. Your previous example was not logic, yet you claim it is - therefore showing you have no idea what logic actually is.
So if I have purchased hardware for the explicit goal of mining crypto and exchanging it for physical cash, and have successfully done that then how exactly should that be interpreted? In your opinion.
The part your ignoring is that it was my interpretation of information that prompted and drove me to buy the hardware.
You claim it’s not logic yet you provide no explanation to why it’s not logic. By the way you are talking to an adult in their 40s who knows how the world works.