I can gamble and win. Does not mean that gambling is a good income source.
From this, you can only deduce (see ? logic) that it is POSSIBLE to be paid for a work done by your computer. Nothing new. What’s new, is that it is possible to do it mining the very specific form you mined.
Now it does not mean it’s a good idea.
And what’s more important, it does not mean it actually adds value.
It’s not logic, because you don’t prove it is. What you are doing is shifting the burden of proof. That example was not an example of logic, on the opposite it was an example of arbitrary interpretation.
It’s not logic, because you don’t exhibit the rules you apply in order to deduce that result.
If you base this on what you think logic means then you’re correct. The rest of the world seems to understand that logic is following a set process which includes not ignoring crucial information. I guess we all have our own perception of the world.
Statement makes no sense.
Logic = considering all facts and coming to a conclusion, a set process was followed which involved finding out all the facts. If one purposely misses facts or ignores factual events then the logic is flawed.
A deduction is logic when it follows logical rules.
Your deduction does not follow rules. So it’s not logic.
still it does.
You are dodging the point again. Your statement was arbitrary. I can as well say that “it’s logical to deduce that you drew the scribbles”. It has exactly the same logical value as yours.
If you used logic, it thus leads to a contradiction ( Contradiction - Wikipedia ) which is a proof that your example was not logic. But here, I’m making already too much work for what you are worth, making stupid statements and claiming it is logic.
Erm No, the given example featured an adult and a child,
“The adult walks into a room and finds markings on the wall”
This tells us the adult is not the one who drew the markings since they are the ones investigating how the markings appeared there! To draw any other conclusion from this example would mean you are ignoring the fact the example is set as the adult investigating an issue which they did not cause.
Go ahead and ignore this crucial bit of info from the example just like how you’ve ignored facts from this BTC topic. I won’t take you seriously if you do this that’s for sure.
How can it be? That’s the given example. the adult did not mark up the wall that is an already established fact. why do you want to change the example when that is how it was given?
It seems to me that things have to change to suit Anderson Geten’s narrative.
Why is it so difficult for you to accept the scenario as I presented it? You don’t seem to understand that the scenario is what it is.
You have to start understanding that nothing in the world is always going to be to your liking, And scenarios will simply play out how they will. Ignoring crucial facts about a scenario will only confuse people. You would make a terrible police officer, you’d walk into a crime scene and expect it to change to fit the narrative you want it to.
I must say it is exhausting explaining to you how the world works.
Not necessary, you could just check out a lot of reviews and make an informed decision.
If I would have to asses if falling of a tall building is dangerous, I’m certain no one counters my “I dropped that apple and it burst into pieces.” answer with “But you didn’t try it yourself, so your opinion is moot. Apples aren’t humans.”. Still I will stay confident that jumping off tall buildings isn’t a healthy thing, eating an apple however isn’t as dangerous.
So you don’t agree that there is a method to follow when assessing something either? And can you stop giving me likes please? You don’t agree with or like what I type so what’s the point?
This might be where you are going wrong with your views about BTC/NFT’s, if you’re depending on other peoples views in order to form your own view then your view will never really be your own. The only way for your view to be your own is to experience it yourself.
I did depend on other peoples views at first and I knew nothing about mining, so I thought to use my gaming machine to mine for 4 months before I made the bigger hardware investment. During that time I was able to form my own viewpoints.
So other peoples views are ok to get you started, but ultimately forming your own view through experience will always be better.
I remember when I was young working for a hardware store doing deliveries, One day me and a colleague went to deliver items to a lady and my colleague warned me that the lady was a bit strange and demanding. I thought ok, when we got there I found the lady was polite and happy and respectful, she engaged in general convo and when we finished delivering the goods she gave us a beer each. Anyone who gives me tasty beer is a good person
I didn’t say anything to my colleague but was unsure how he arrived at his opinion on the lady, she seemed really cool. If I had only followed my colleagues assessment and not bothered to see for myself then my opinion on the lady would have been wrong and it was my colleague that is the difficult one.
That’s the thing, some of the information I gathered was right, some was biased and some information was wrong. We did a good job discussing it in these forums. EVE Online players are the only persistent people that will keep going and ‘fighting the good fight’ and eventually even I will be completely informed.
There is nothing wrong with the biased people as they will find a lot of points (some true, some false) about crypto that are worth contemplating.
I disagree on some points but I do like a lot of points you and Karak_Terrel brought up. Keep in mind that anyone can start to do crypto it’s like anyone can steer a car but since there are no traffic rules, I project a large number of casualties. I could be wrong, but in the case of crypto, it is clear it’s a complex system and I have seen a lot of cases shady people running solutions for problems they created.
I could be wrong, but there are many points where we should not disagree as ;
Crypto uses a lot of energy and if not centralized (near waste energy producers like power plants) it will be a lot of waste.
Countries like to have rules and thus control their currency. Generally to keep the economy going strong (whether it’s for their rich friends or the poor (to move them up to the working class) is debatable). There are exceptions like El Salvador, a Country for Citizens Who Can’t Do Economy Good and Wanna Learn to Do Other Stuff Good Too. Mostly because too many people there don’t trust the government and end up trusting criminal gangs and cartels.
The original BTC developer(s) “Satoshi” remains unknown. This makes the “We don’t trust them banksters!” phrase really hilarious as bitcoin gives bankers what they really wanted; unmitigated free economy where no one will arrest them for any wrongdoings. That takes us to the following point.
Governments are taking control over the “flow” of crypto in their respective countries and collaborate worldwide. This makes the “Yo dawgz, we crypto owners are the rebelzzz!” completely moot. It’s like the Pirate Bay, once popular but it got shut down eventually. People can still torrent but on shady sites and one can never be sure if they downloaded the latest illegal copy of “Adobe Photoshop” or some botnet client.
What will happen in May as in April a lot of companies that invested have to pay their taxes? Well, certainly 1 or 3 companies that own most of the bitcoin…
Crypto is a high risk investment not some (inter)national currency.
People starting to understand crypto is a bigger danger for it than when people did it for the “IT fun” and “Being the rebel without a cause”.
This is false, he is well known. When BTC was created “Satoshi” assigned himself a number of BTC. He was able to access that exact same BTC cache without issue. He is Satoshi.
He wanted to keep the $54 billion in BTC for himself, but was forced to pay a colleagues family/business $100m
Can you see how there might be a flaw in your views? You wasn’t aware the BTC creator had been found. (i posted this earlier in the thread) but you missed it or ignored it and ended up with the viewpoint I just quoted.
If one doesn’t follow a logical system of finding the truth it will end in inaccuracies and confusion.
