NPC Mining Groups Too Much

I’m not sure if you want sympathy for being so bad at the game that you are beaten by a couple of NPCs.

You can easily leave for another system that has plenty of more asteroid belts. If you’re too afraid to leave the highsec system you’re in, that’s your problem.

2 Likes

NPC’s mining? Dafuq? Since when is this a thing? why are CCP wasting system resources governing bot mining in High sec? surely those system resources would be better utilised elsewhere in the server processes than running bot mining fleets!!! Wait Bot Mining lol CCP is botting ahahahahahahaa hypocrites

1 Like

I saw it as creating pve content that holds elements of pvp.

I understand that a pve player can become a pirate or role play as one by attacking the npc retrievers etc for ore cargo. Also running from the white diamond response fleet would be similar escaping from a mining corps members response fleet.

I kind of like that aspect of the mining belts.

NPCs are bots. You want players that are at their keyboard to have to deal with sanctioned Bot Miners, because that is what NPC miner fleets are.

1 Like

No, that’s what they feel like to you.
You can solve this problem by just moving to another system.

You’re not entitled to mine in a system, especially if you don’t even have the time to dedicate to EVE Online, regardless of your real world situation.

Either suck it up and realize that you need to change your approach because it’s really silly to expect a game that’s on 24/7 to cater to your specific wants, or get better and stop whining about how it hurts your feelings and is unfair.

1 Like

No, that is what they physically are. AI driven ships interacting with the game resources.

Please extrapolate more of my feelings from fact, its like a different kind of salt and I am kind of liking the flavor.

2 Likes

Been peeking in and out of the forums checking whats new, in one post theres loads of complaints against afk miners, ice bots. no one other than this is pointing out CCP brought in their own bots to strip the asteroid belts, of course some point to sending people to greener grass and saying Anomalies, had a look through 8 systems nothing other than Omber and a small kernite belt, not quite the same as a colossal or whatever spawns in null. now we have Recon trigs popping ventures like a shooting gallery.

I am losing track of CCP’s aim, you give people a venture when starting out and running career agents, pushing them to look to mining as an isk generator, something you could always fall back on, now the casual player is left wondering what to do. Do you think anyone is going invite loads of alphas not knowing if they will play next week or not. people complain about bots, CCP bring in its own bots (silence) CCP then brings in Trig Scouts, its a big jump from career agent to pve against Trigs.

1 Like

Nobody else is pointing it out because they recognize that it’s an irretrievably stupid assertion and they don’t feel like sacrificing their credibility for the sake of making a deliberately obtuse argument guaranteed to yield nothing but derision.

The trouble with bots is that they provide an unfair advantage to players and they support RMT activity. NPCs do not.

1 Like

The npcs should mine ice as well. Would make it a little more interesting. all ore anomalies should be also a warp in point for npc mining. Its highsec afterall. or just make ore & ice annoms scannable sigs random. little more hustle for those in hs looking for easy isk.

Do you have any proof of these player bots doing RMT?

Also all NPC Mining Fleets, roving Trig gangs, etc are indeed bots. CCP implemented them in High Sec for 2 reasons, none of which is even remotely connected to stopping player bots doing RMT.

  1. CCP is attempting to force players into Low and Null Sec space.
  2. CCP is attempting to force solo players into group play.

Why are CCP forcing players to do things in a sandbox game? That’s not their job. Their job is to provide a sandbox and the players decide what they want to do and how.

Something I think CCP has seriously forgotten over the last 6 years since i last played.

1 Like

Supposedly CCP wants more destruction in-game from players.

Basically it’ll get them free advertisement from write-ups in game news/review sites, like the big Alliance Wars use to do. Which will hopefully bring in new players.

For the most part, apparently… :rofl:

You mean aside from it being the centerpiece of pretty much every quarterly security report ever?

While we don’t respond to every individual report of botting or real money trading, they’re all taken 100% seriously, and are thoroughly investigated for credibility.

Multiple reports from different sources also remain incredibly valuable and allow us to cross reference behavior and nail these guys faster.

The main thing we want to emphasize though is that without a demand for RMT – without pilots in EVE buying dirty ISK from these guys, these guys can’t operate.

Do you really want to run with the 200IQ spodbrain argument that people who are selling ISK for real money aren’t also industrializing their operation via automation?

Be sure to report them, then. And all the other NPCs, too!

Explain your rationale in the bot report in detail.

I’m sure they’ll be absolutely blown away by your very clever and unassailable argument and remove… no… ban… these bots at once.

Good thing I never suggested it was in any way connected to stopping player bots doing RMT.

What I said was that, bots, which are colloquially understood within the community to be player automation, yield illicit benefits to a player. NPCs, while sharing the quality of “automation”, are simply part of the game world and are not being operated to provide a player with illicit gains. Thus, reducing the two to a single shared feature and then trying to say, “Look, they’re totally the same!” is a deliberately obtuse, dishonest argument that actively avoids the totality of facts in favor of a position that focuses on a solitary technical similarity.

Which is why most people wouldn’t actually make that argument.

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

Hmm, let’s see.

This is actual fact, with citation, in direct response to your question, along with a reframing of the question to illustrate how bizarre it is. The association between botting and RMT is such a well-established fact that you may as well have asked for evidence that water is wet, or that it gets dark at night.

And, again, a reframing of the position to illustrate how laughably ridiculous the NPCS = BOTS! argument is. You’re not going to report them as bots, because they’re clearly not.

And this is a direct response to your strawman misrepresentation of what I had previously said, explaining, in exacting detail, the difference between what I had actually previously said and your misrepresentation of what I had said.

first… yes there is proof that Bots are the number 1 suppliers of ISK for RMT services. CCP are able to track isk and assets transferred between characters and also have solid bot detecting and reporting programs and policies.

second: NPC fleets are not there to force people in to Low/nul sec. they were added because people have been asking for more life in space since the beginning of the game. the mining fleets, as i have previously broken down, are easily delt with & can be killed for the ORE they mined.

third: the Trig recon NPCs are part of the invasion expansion and storyline and have not been added to “force people in to low sec”. these are another dynamic that people need to adapt to as part of this invasion, expect that CCP will add more in the future.

1 Like

I’ve been an active member of these forums for over 10 years and have seen the threads complaining about bots and RMT. I’ve also seen CCP post all the gigantic amounts of banned ‘Bot Accounts’ due to their ‘War On Bots’. If CCP is so good at detecting and removing bots then why is there still such a big problem of bots in the game? I’ve seen some players post that all this new content, the Blackout, roaming Trig gangs, FOB’s, etc is helping to get rid of bots. Seems mighty convenient.

As for all this new content, I’ve never seen any threads posted asking CCP to add NPC Mining Fleets to mine all the Asteroid Belts dry in High Sec. Same goes for FOB’s / Pirate Strongholds.

The main reason that content was added is because CCP wants more player ships destroyed in the game. They constantly ‘lol’ about how many player ships are being destroyed by these new NPC’s. I don’t care if you think they can be easily dealt with, that’s not the point. The point is nobody asked for that type of content to be added to the game so stop saying players for years have been asking for that type of content.

For a long time players have been asking CCP to add / update new Missions and Exploration sites, some players have even asked that they be more interactive with different completion options available instead of just constantly saving the Damsel from Kruul. Instead of working on that, CCP decided to add new group content.

That’s because for years CCP has been trying to get players in High Sec to form large corps, fleet up and go to war with others. Hell, CCP tried a passive approach to get players to fleet up with Resource Wars and that failed right from the start due to shitty rewards. FOB’s and NPC Mining Fleets weren’t doing it either so now it’s hardball action with roaming Triglavian gangs.

If all this new content is so great then why are log in numbers still dropping?

1 Like

in response.

  • it is not that people have asked specify for Mining fleets, more that people have wanted to see the comings and goings of the citizens of the eve universe. weather through actual ships doing things or more lively station exits… CCP addressed this itch by adding mining fleets. keep in mind the there have always been the intra station hauling trains (not seen any of these in a while) you could kill these to for commodities they carried but as they were under sentry protection you would have to be vary picky about your target.

the mining fleets although frustrating to some added a real entity that could interact with the player and influence the choices available to you. “i have previously outlined these choices in my posts above”

  • CCP is always improving thair BOT detection process and adjusting where appropriate. in the same vain the BOT programmers are doing the same. the is the arms race the DEVS and CCP as a publicly trading company are fighting in. .

  • CCP post statistics about player deaths to NPCs because we the players have a vested interest in the data, everyone in eve likes salt in one form or another, weather through PVP and ganking or laughing at each others silly NPC losses. CCP dont just compile these statistics to rub our noses in them and call us noob scrubs.

these metrics also help CCP to judge any given addition and adjust proactively to ensure that the new content is balanced and where appropriate can be countered by the player base.

  • people are able to solo FOBs and mining fleets. the roving triglavian gangs can be seen on D-scan so are avoidable, there are only 2 NPC activities that require you to fleet up, these being incursions & invasions

  • CCP have stated on many occasions that they wish to address the Mission system, however they are working with code that was compiled in 2003/4 and is vary tricky for them to adjust. they have also stated that with the new systems they are using today, that they are getting to a point now where tackling the behemoth that is the mission system is finally an achievable task

  • currently exploration is in a good place, each major pirate faction has a comparable amount of content through the escalations, anomalies & DED sites. there is also WH, both stable and shattered, with benefits to lower end systems C1/3.

People have been screaming for content for years, CCP have answered these calls and introduced some great content fir the avid PVEr and Law nerd. just because you dont like it dose not mean that it is bad.