Hmmm, I don’t see any of the crushing blows to gankers that make hi sec a safer place that certain people were sure CCP was working on. It almost appears that some of this might could be construed as making it less safe. I’m so confused because I was told so many times that stopping the evil griefing of hi sec was such a big priority for them, what with all their fancy slides at Fanfest.
CCP have stated they intend to reduce ganking. That doesn’t mean it’ll happen at every given patch.
I have to ask, what benefit is there to these comments? It won’t stop CCP making a change. Guarantee you can go back to just prior to the war changes and see people similarly saying “heh heh, where are the wardec changes people have been saying are coming then to destroy wars”.
And hey, perhaps we’re wrong, but between Hellmars AMA, the winter Q&A, the fanfest mentions and the blog post, I feel it’s pretty unlikely that we’ll see no changes.
An overwhelming amount of Posts ( Over 300 ) have been removed for various rule violations, a majority being Off-Topic.
1. Specifically restricted conduct.
The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to courteous when disagreeing with others.
In order to maintain an environment where everyone is welcome and discussion flows freely, certain types of conduct are prohibited on the EVE Online forums. These are:
Trolling
Flaming
Ranting Personal Attacks
Harassment
Doxxing
Racism & Discrimination
Hate Speech
Sexism Spamming
Bumping Off-Topic Posting
Pyramid Quoting
Rumor Mongering
New Player Bashing
Impersonation
Advertising
i really don’t like the idea of 100% brm by default.
CCP could have fixed a lot of issues with that, for example Time Zone Tanking SOV.
Make BRM min 100% only during vulnerability for example.
It would make bigger multi timezone alliances more vulnerable aswell.