Fantastic changes.
What think you high sec denizens? I’m pleased as punch!
Someone check @Ramona_McCandless for a pulse!
What? Whats this fashion for linking me into nonsensical posts?
Hmmm, I don’t see any of the crushing blows to gankers that make hi sec a safer place that certain people were sure CCP was working on. It almost appears that some of this might could be construed as making it less safe. I’m so confused because I was told so many times that stopping the evil griefing of hi sec was such a big priority for them, what with all their fancy slides at Fanfest.
thats good news
coercer navy issue 
Cruiser sized guns on Navy dessies please
An overwhelming amount of Posts ( Over 300 ) have been removed for various rule violations, a majority being Off-Topic.
1. Specifically restricted conduct.
The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to courteous when disagreeing with others.
In order to maintain an environment where everyone is welcome and discussion flows freely, certain types of conduct are prohibited on the EVE Online forums. These are:
Trolling
Flaming
Ranting
Personal Attacks
Harassment
Doxxing
Racism & Discrimination
Hate Speech
Sexism
Spamming
Bumping
Off-Topic Posting
Pyramid Quoting
Rumor Mongering
New Player Bashing
Impersonation
Advertising
We need more explanations. Devil lies in details.
What is “discourage” ? What is “high tier” ? (I think I know what is highsec, thanks)
i really don’t like the idea of 100% brm by default.
CCP could have fixed a lot of issues with that, for example Time Zone Tanking SOV.
Make BRM min 100% only during vulnerability for example.
It would make bigger multi timezone alliances more vulnerable aswell.
This is the reason I will be re subbing my 2 x eve accounts. Brm at under 100% was just nasty.
People shud be rewarded for not sticking to safety.
Brm punish people for playing the game.
100℅ minimum will generate more content and reward players whit 100+ for not sticking to safety.
Rewarding players are much better then punishing simply for playing the game
Normally krabs make the opposite claim
“We fought hard for our Sov Space, so it SHOULD be safe because we work for it”.
Dont you work to make where you krab safer?
Apples and oranges.
Im agree whit you. But im talking just about brm.
So let me rephraze
Brm shud reward people who are willing to make extra risk for extra rewards
Let me rephrase
What extra risk are you taking in your umbrella-protected Sov Null bubble?
Moving to rat in system thats not under umbrela where you are probabli alone and response will take long time.
Not all systems are in drop range of staging and even jumpbridges are not lowering range enough to safe rattimg ships thats far
Ok, and whats stopping you doing that atm?
Again apples and oranges.
Now people are forced and punished by not doing that.
Removing brm penalty and leaving bonuses change that…
And bring more people to the game.
Basicli now eve give everybody stick and almost no carrots.
After patch there will be no stick and just carrots.
8 Offtopic Posts deleted. Be civil and Stick to the Topic.
People can do that now.
You’re just afraid to do it with risk 
Im not going to discuss moderation but I will repeat my On Topic Point:
The krabs got what they wanted and THEY STILL WANT MORE.
