Or so she thinks.
Slander is spoken defamation. Libel is published or broadcast defamation. If you are serious, do consider taking proper advice as these distinctions matter. As it happens, we issued advice on a libel claim to a client just today so would be happy to talk it through. For good measure, your residency and the subject matter of the statement would probably provide a nexus to claim Federal jurisdiction successfully.
On public fora I largely donât care to make the distinction, but in the actual proceeding of things Iâm well aware the distinction and importance there of donât worry.
This is a barrel of laughs considering who is posting it.
I will treasure this post, may it brighten my darkest days.
Wasnât it so when you pointed your drill at LDPS?
Considering the contents and quality of your replies I have seen for years, of course, you shall treasure it, since it could be as well been adressed to you if for some reason I wanted to speak with you.
If you didnât want to speak to her, why are you?
I hear Amarrians and in particular Kanids celebrate with orgies with sex slaves. Is that considered pious activity?
Because she dared to open her useless mouth at me, just like you did. Otherwise I wouldnât even notice existence of persons like her or you.
Now, be so kind to learn your place already and stop talking to me, you are absolutely not interesting.
Speaking aboutâŚ
Well, go ahead, try to sue me for stating a fact, that would be an amusing case. Besides, you know, I always say that I will answer for every word I say and surely will visit this tribunal session for a good entertainment show.
On the other hand, if you consider I offended you, you could have easily challenged me.
As it is said, only slaves and dishonorable cowards donât avenge for offenses. Go ahead, your move, DRILL TERRORIST.
Oh, Diana⌠you really never do learn a damned thing, do you? Itâs one of the things that makes you such a ready chew-toy.
Lai Dai claiming something is terrorism doesnât actually make it terrorism, any more than you claiming the same would.
Lai Dai claiming something is terrorism, and having the legal backing to make those claims, the isk to take lawsuits to court, and the media influence to craft a narrative, would in fact make something terrorism to a large selection of people. Naturally you can claim itâs not terrorism, but the Empire would claim what it does to the Republic is not terrorism. Itâs up to who is making the claim and how much influence they have.
And Lai Dai have a lot of influence.
Being able to sell a lie doesnât make it true. It only makes it well-sold.
A truth nobody believes is a useless truth.
âNobodyâ is a feat well beyond even the best of megacorp marketing.
I mean, itâs just a stating of a fact.
But in the end, the discussion of our DRILL TERRORISTâs motivations (or her being a terrorist or not) isnât really profitable, and it really derails us from the important part.
It doesnât really matter if sheâs a terrorist or not.
What does matter is that she has committed a CRIMINAL offense against the State and THREATENED a State Corporation.
Call it terrorism, call it self-defence, call it piracy, call it incompetence, call it anti-profitable activity, call it dancing on a dead slaver houndâs head, call it wearing fedoâs tentacle on forehead, or call it kissing gallente boots - while it could be lie or it could be truth, these words are not important. Her actions are.
And for them she shall answer.
But what about the rampaging precursor AI in Eugales ?
Thatâs still happening, right ?
Did you ask this to DERAIL?
Well Iâm kind of reluctant to communicate with them directly, in case they start asking me awkward questions about Synthias brain and what exactly my role in her creation was.
I did not have the questions. Now I have them all.