It took more like 3 minutes to compose it, and half of that was looking up the planetary data. It took 10 days for me to notice your reply, sorry. Life’s been kinda busy.
And I should care why?
Because you’re 10 days post conversion. We moved on. And so did the discussion.
Do try and keep up.
1 Like
My question stands.
Because:
Apparently it’s rather difficult for you to comprehend that the conversation has concluded. It came to an end. It’s been laid to rest. I’ve moved on. Perhaps maybe you can to. But I won’t hold my breath.
So I hope your question (which I already answered. I’ll post it again, in case you missed it:
has strong legs, because it’s going to be standing there a long time or until you comprehend that the conversation has concluded and everyone else has moved on.
Oh, I promise, I’m not the one with comprehension problems here. I just don’t care if you’ve moved on. My decision to say my piece had nothing to do with whether or not you wanted an answer, just like my decision to explain now has nothing to do with whether or not you’ve moved on, or will even read this. If you do, great. If you don’t, so what? I felt like writing it out, so I did. Your feelings on this were never a consideration.
Okay,
Thanks for sharing 
My guess your comprehension skills are stronger than my own pilot.
I’ll be totally honest, if he can take that ship on parade in highsec, you should be asking him to teach you his ways.
1 Like
It is a remarkably pretty ship, though.
2 Likes
Yup. My thoughts are never dependent upon others’ interest in them.
1 Like
You might want to work harder on the “moving on” part. Because to me it reads like you aren’t, you are trying to get the last word.
Ah, excellent point.
Okay. Fixed!
1 Like
I was, but they had no interest, so, you know, that’s fine. I still felt like expressing myself. Whether they engage or not is entirely up to them, and I’m not going to try harassing them into a response. Why bother?
At the same time, why shouldn’t I express myself? Especially since, y’know, I thought I’d made it pretty clear that I’d blocked Aria and suggested she do the same… so how would I know she’s explained anything, or if her explanation in any way accurately reflects what I’d been saying? Maybe it doesn’t. So why not make my position clear?
If that’s true, then I really do owe you all an apology for anyone who might’ve thought I was only a bit of an ass. As you well know. 
Careful! Apparently now there’s a limited window for replies on the IGS, after which, you’re being a bit of an ass.
(Is that better @Amicia_Cora? I’d never want people to think I’m not a complete ass. Wouldn’t be right to lie to them like that.)
Yeah, about 3 months, after which the CRC says “no more replies”. Introduced a few years ago now. Though there’s a handful of older threads to which the limit oddly does not apply.
Yeah just had to (again) request the closure of my old recruiting thread very recently as it was still open after more than two years. 
In this thread, Arrendis argues to ignore criticism of the sexual abuse of enslaved persons, based on personalities involved.
Truly the IGS has fallen, when principles are compromised in order to be popular with the hip in-crowd.
2 Likes
I am going to have to hire a team to find this “hip in-crowd” that keeps being brought up. Over a decade and a half now and I’ve yet to see hide nor hair of one of those around here.
and what’s your stance on having slaves give you foot massages ?
If you feel a need to ask me anything at all related to slavery, I suspect I must be some sort of blindspot in your feeds.