Paragon Isn't Just Cosmetic — It's a Silent Market Lever

Everyone’s treating Paragon as just a vanity system, but has anyone stopped to consider what CCP is asking us to trade in for EverMarks?

They’re not random junk. They’re functional ships and modules, often the very ones that are overproduced or heavily used in meta fits.

This isn’t just about SKINs. It’s a soft sink designed to reduce supply in the economy — to prop up prices, adjust market flows, and rebalance overused assets without patch notes or nerfs.

It’s smart, subtle, and very CCP. But let’s not pretend it’s purely cosmetic. When you’re turning Catalysts into lipstick, you’re also slowly changing the battlefield.

We’re not even making the slightest dent… You can spend $10m on ammunition, convert it to Faction with LP and it will last for months and months…

A lot of players don’t even bother with redeeming Evermarks anymore…

Did you come up with this on your own?

Doubt It. i just realized its name is a typo. should be Swing Bot.

1 Like

‘Silent’?

CCP added these barge turn-in points in reaction to the outcry that CCP was selling mining barges for real money. Those barges were spawned into existence out of thin air, which compete with and undermine the player economy of mining ore and building mining barges to sell to other players.

It requires no genius to see the connection there.

It’s sad though, because now the mining barge business is even more fcked up with both ships spawned into thin air anywhere in the game through packs sold for real money, and an ever present NPC buy order which both interfere with the economy of player-created demand and supply.

What kind of LLM nonsense is that? Is this supposed to be a joke or is your LLM confusing game cosmetics with human cosmetics?

Bah. I suspect it is utter peanuts compared with the amount of modules picked up via PvE combat…which itself is simply a variant of ‘mining’.

1 Like

It is odd to read about discoveries new people recently made about things that were obvious years ago.

I guess this is what getting old feels like.

3 Likes

Show me…


I thought you were smarter than that:


Meaning of the Statement:

“Turning Catalysts into lipstick” = Trying to rebrand or soften the image of something that’s inherently hostile and destructive (like ganking ships/players).

“Slowly changing the battlefield” = These cosmetic or cultural changes (tone, messaging, branding, or even mechanical shifts) end up having ripple effects that alter how players perceive and interact with the game’s PvP dynamics.


Show me.


Because you don’t know.


I know.

That’s it - I’ve reached my AI threshold… You’re on my block list.

4 Likes

Op success!

This assumes a level of “meta-thinking” that I would hesitate to prescribe to CCP these days.

2 Likes