He not used AI to this, he used AI to create whole post, What kind of creativity of ideas does he have then? And for words/grammar correction, translators are for this not AI, and still are better broken personally words instead of AI slop.
And the fact that you advocate this as a member of the CSM finds it absolutely laughable.
So what are you actually offering here?
He doesn’t have any actual offers, just braindead AI slop with the help of some “friends” apparently. He must think GPT is sentient.
What kind of creativity of ideas does he have then?
Absolutely none, just wants to put out big buzzwords which mean absolutely nothing.
I think the way you respond to criticism is a perfect example of why you shouldn’t be in the CSM.
I was simply replying to the fact that he said he did, I actually think he used AI for the whole thing personally how the point was he said he used no AI, then said he used some. You know most grammar correction tools (see Grammarly, Word autocorrect etc) , actually use generative AI right?
Unfortunately he doesn’t seem to be responding on this thread anymore, but he elaborated on his desired all-caps reforms somewhat in Discord, so I’ll paste it over here with minimal editorializing.
On CSM reform:
When I talk about reform for the CSM I’m talking about reforms for limiting the representation of all areas of space to be more equal so for example having 3 elected members from each sec sector. What this means
3 from high sec
3 from low sec
3 from wormhole space
3 from null secThis way each sector of space will feel like they have equal representation on the council for stellar management and we can finally rid the community of this feeling of disenfranchisement from less represented sectors.
We then went on to discuss the difficulty of defining which area of space a player is “from,” which he failed to provide any solution for.
On economy reform:
Economy reform to correct for pricing of items and for better stocked local NPC stations. Also for the injection of new monies while adhearing to strict economic guidelines that i wish to help put forward by electing a economic reform team comprised of industrialists from all sectors to see how we can make the economy better and stronger.
He was unfortunately unable to explain what makes any given item’s pricing “correct” or incorrect, and did not respond to concerns about how his desire to have CCP better stock local NPC stations would undercut the player-driven economy.
On tax reform:
tax reform. This one I feel will be the trickiest of them all and am open to the most suggestions about but what I have in mind I want to advocate on behalf of ALL players from all sectors of new eden that I want to see what these taxes that we play are being spent on! (Just like irl) constituents have the right to know where there taxes are going.. and I will also be advocating and pushing for a new tax return day to happen once a year where players can earn a return from the tax system based off of the any monies collected by government agents,story missions or special event missions. This will help further stimulate what taxes are used for and help new and existing players understand why they pay taxes except for arbitrary reasons such as “it’s just a game mechanic”
Despite multiple attempts to explain, he did not seem to grasp the concept that in-game taxes exist primarily to remove isk from the economy and are not “spent on” anything. He made several contradictory arguments about why his proposed tax return day once a year would not contribute to in-game inflation.
On taxation without representation:
Summarized I think it’s a combination of your three previous questions. Representation is the biggest form of player retention in my mind. The grind, but knowing that there are players who actively have your best interest is what I mean about equal representation. This is very broad for now as I flush this out some more but this is the core of what I stand on
He did not respond to attempts to further elucidate this last point.
So…long story short, this guy is a hack who doesn’t even understand basics of the game.
Hello piett weyun, first of all good luck with your campaign 
…and may the best will win ofc 
(I will great every candidate this way 
)
Hope you find time to share your thoughts on below topics and game ideas.
|
1. EVE Vanguard
Have you had an occasion to try it during Operation Nemesis or earlier? What was your impression if any? What do you think about bidirectional connection planned with EVE Online? Do you see it has a potential to attract more players towards New Eden? And do you think Capsuleers will benefit from it? |
|
2. Information & ISK itemization
How about being able to take a notes from your notepad and put it as an item into container or ship cargo? Same with an amount of ISK? Just like you can do with PLEX. More details https://forums.eveonline.com/t/information-itemization-put-notes-into-cargo-containers Would you pitch CCP to consider implementing it? |
|
3. Production Plans
Basically the idea behind this is to bundle all the BPOs (BPCs), required to produce some final product, say, an assembled Drake fully fitted according to some saved fit ready for duty, into a single BPO-like item, and internally arranged into an intricate production workflow. Complete with logistics tasks, if necessary, using delivery corp projects. It could use BPMN diagram editor to arrange. When installed into industrial job slot it will churn out those Drakes, provided there are required materials in linked containers or pause until they are become available again. More details https://forums.eveonline.com/t/feature-request-production-plans Would you pitch CCP to consider implementing it? Or at least expand ESI to allow 3rd party developers to do it? |
1. EVE Vanguard
i have it downloaded, i myself havent played it yet but will be playing it in the coming days as i am a veteran of the IMO better vanguard (Dust 514). and seeing as i loved dust 514 and was hoping that they would of stuck with that project until sony killed it. so far my only impressions are simply by watching my friends play it and watching streamers play it. i think it looks like a very fun game and hope that CCP takes it as far as they did Dust 514, as for the bidirectional connection that it has planned with EVE im all for it!! 100%!!
do i think it will attact more players? i think that if CCP does a good job with it and follows up with community imput i think it will attract a lot of new players especially the FPS crowd, and who knows maybe a % of those players would be interested in seeing what EVE is actually like, but this is gully reliant on how well they implement the bidrectional status of the game. make the game more multiplayer based, if dust supported 36 players back in 2014 then i dont see why dust couldnt support lets say 48 two teams of 24, mix that in with EVE players being able to coordinate with Vangaurd corps to provide orbital/atmospheric support and i think that they will of struck gold.
2. Information & ISK itemization
ive seen and read over youre post, i think that if you can transfer PLEX which is much more valuable into youre cargo hold then i dont see any reason as to why you shouldnt be able to transfer ISK into youre cargo hold. it adds another level of immersion into the game, much like from popular scifi in the Andor series, we see rebles stealing imperial credits, the same kind of *immersion* could be added to EVE online. i can already think that the Ganking/Pirating communities would absolutely love it as it would make their already impressive kills even juicier if they see a cargohold full of ISK.
as for pitching it to CCP, look im down to pitch anything to CCP as long as the Community that being you and every other capsuleer that i want to rep is behind it, while i think that there might be some pushback to it, i think that if we think tanked it there would be no reason for me to propose the idea to CCP and the rest of the council. change isnt always a bad thing, and it can lead to better gameplay/loops
3. Production Plans
YES!! 100% to this, this is something that many production players have mentioned and brought to my attention, even within my own corp. look EVE online is as complicated game as you want to make it and i treasure that, but that doenst mean that every player wants to go through the rigamarol of attemping to figure it out. i think that combining BPOs into a finalized package could be really cool. for a couple of reasons…\
as for 3rd party developers, that something that we would have to discuss with CCP but again i think that if there is enough support for it from the community i dont see why they wouldnt allow it and yes i would 100% pitch the idea to CCP if and when it gets fully flushed out, industrialist would love…ITS TIME TO SEIZE THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION!! haha
i hope that this has helped answer some of youre questions, if not feel free to reach me here, or via the ingame mail system. i think you have some pretty cool ideas and id enjoy talking more about them!!
the good news is my ideas dont matter, its YOURE ideas, the players that matter! the roll of the CSM as ive now understood is to Represent the players to CCP not the other way around! im fully conviced that working together i can represent you to CCP!!
dont forget to vote, this years election is very important
yes its true, i used ai to help me but most of it was written by me. my ideas are for CSM reformation primarily i have some ideas to help recruit ne players but i think that those will ultimetly be a little bit more difficult as they rely soley on advocating to CCP to lower the cost of omega subscriptions. let me just reitereate what these very kind people have seemed to not understand yet…I am a noob, ive been playing the game for less then a year. ive said it before ill say it again, my ideas are extreme in nature but its for two reasons. one to garnish attention and two becasue i think that there needs to be some extreme reform done if not in 5-7 years the game will half the amount of players that there currently are
if you think i am a hack there is no reason to vote for me then and even less reason to be such an rude twat, simply go vote for youre nullsec overlords and continue shilling for them. if the USE of AI ruffles youre feathers soo much then i dont know what to tell you, youre just a petulant child. dont like my platform oh well, want to be a dick? fine go a head!!
i wasnt able to respond because i was nowhere near my computer and was on a retreat, where i was there was no signal unless by satalie phone…and im not using a expensive satalite connection to respond to questions about a video game. but let me respond now.
CSM reform is simple if back in 2009 larkoness trassler was able to be caught within meer hours by CCP security trying to do insider trading via his enrolment with CSM then being in 2025-2026 im sure that CCP security can easily find out where players are playing from. my reform for my 3 person representation is simple. be playing in those regions for at least a year that means your active in those areas, 90% of youre assets/wealth must be in the designated areas. also it would locked to the account that if you have alts on the account it will also track where those alts are, character ! is in hisec but then character 2,3 play in losec or nullsec then character 1 would not be elgiable for that (riding). this reform could root out some major corruption if properly implemented, that way we can pinpoint where reps are. hopefully this helps answer some of the questions regarding this reformation
ecconomy reform answer
I’d reform the EVE Online economy by decentralizing production and trade—shifting value creation from major hubs to regional economies. This means rebalancing resource distribution, incentivizing local industry, and introducing dynamic supply-demand mechanics that respond to player activity. The goal: make logistics, scarcity, and regional trade meaningful again, restoring player-driven economic depth. thats just an idea, realistically id like to hear from the community as to how we could better reform the economy and see what ideas CCP themselves have regarding it
tax reform
The system is fragile not because change is impossible, but because small tax shifts cascade through markets, nullsec economies, and player behavior.
That said, meaningful reform could work if done gradually and regionally—for example:
Dynamic taxes tied to system activity (busy hubs pay more, frontier systems pay less).
Faction-based or corp-controlled tax incentives to encourage regional trade.
Progressive transaction fees that scale with wallet size or volume to fight hoarding and botting.
So yess, it’s reformable, but it requires a light touch and iterative balancing to avoid destabilizing ISK flow or driving trade into loopholes. once again like my economy refrom ideas, it all rellies on community imput via ingame imput, discord imput or forum imput. as for the tax refund i think it would be interesting, but ultimetly i dont think it would or could be implemented. as it stand the ecomic reforms are here simply to incentivise player stations to want to take the risk of opening a hub on their stations without the Nullsec Cartels instantly wardecking them. dont you think its crazy that not a single player owned station in hi sec is willing to put up market hubs? its almost as if they have a mafia strong man making sure that they arent allowed to play the game.
my entire platform is designed to dismantle and weaken the power base of the nullsec cartels. as i strongly feel that they are going to be THE main reason why eve online dies. i never again want to hear the statement (just leave hisec) again from a player(s) who think that they can dictate the game to new recruits or currently players. high omega subcription costs and the terrorizing death grip that the nullsec cartels have imposed on new eden will be the ultimate downfall of eve online.
if these answeres helped aawesome, if not ill help clarify. either way dont forget to vote
if by critisim you mean adhomine attacks then i would you perfer i take a turn the other cheek approach. look the simple fact is that the requiment set out by CCP as for who can run for the CSM where lined out, i fit all of them. after that even a politician has to go out on the attack if hes being constatly attacked by everyone. ill admit some of my responses have been harsh but it is what it is. im here simply to show people that standing up the nullsec MAFIA is doable, and that if a noob can do it then at some point later even a veteran can do it. if you dont like the way i respond thats ok, feel free to vote for the candidate that waltzes around flower bushes and who is as gentle as a feather.
So now you’re calling anyone who disagrees with you a Nullsec Mafia member. Apparently anyone who calls you out has no valid criticism, just “attacks.” No one is going to vote for a CSM who thinks that anyone and everyone who voices their own opinions towards him is an “attacker.” If you don’t like me being “rude,” then you should try to practice what you preach as a candidate, rather than trying to make everyone out for fools.
You say that you are a “noob,” but then also say that you are a veteran? Which is it - make up your mind. You said that you didn’t use AI, then you used AI to format, then you used AI to help? Again - which is it? The fact of the matter is, I was polite and respectful in my first post. You’re the one who instigated this entire debacle here by not just owning up to what you did, and are now frantically scrambling trying to pull the pieces back together.
You call people who disagree with you “petulant children.” You bully people by making yourself into a victim and calling them the “attackers.” You’re overall, probably the worst candidate I have seen out of all the forums so far. Players aren’t going to back down to your whim and stay silent. If you want a community where no one says anything, this isn’t the place for you.
Once again it is super obvious that you handed off to chatgpt to answer the bits about economy reform and tax reform. Unsurprisingly, the suggestions that chatgpt came up with are completely different from the ones you yourself provided in discord a few days ago. The chatgpt suggestions are better than the ones you provided in discord, but that’s a low bar.
If CCP wants chatgpt suggestions they can ask chatgpt themselves. CSM seats should be for people who are familiar with the game and can speak from their own experience, not for people who just relay chatgpt responses.
i literally didnt use ai, i simply looked at the economic post that CCP sent out asked questions to my friends in game and out of game who study economics and asked them what they thought. look idk how much more i can do apart from live streaming screen all day so you people stop going of with the schitzo talk about me using GPT. its simple if you dont like the platform that im going off of, DO NOT VOTE FOR ME. but for the love of all that is holy give it a break with the crying about ai for god sakes, the year is 2025 get off youre high self appointed horse….BE GONST!!!
Please stop treating everyone here like they are stupid. It is bitingly obvious which sections of your post you wrote and which sections you did not. You insult us when you say that the same person who wrote this:
be playing in those regions for at least a year that means your active in those areas, 90% of youre assets/wealth must be in the designated areas. also it would locked to the account that if you have alts on the account it will also track where those alts are, character ! is in hisec but then character 2,3 play in losec or nullsec then character 1 would not be elgiable for that (riding).
wrote this as well:
The system is fragile not because change is impossible, but because small tax shifts cascade through markets, nullsec economies, and player behavior.
That said, meaningful reform could work if done gradually and regionally—for example:
Dynamic taxes tied to system activity (busy hubs pay more, frontier systems pay less).
Faction-based or corp-controlled tax incentives to encourage regional trade.
Progressive transaction fees that scale with wallet size or volume to fight hoarding and botting.
once again….FOR THOSE IN THE BACK…I DID NOT USE AI FOR THAT RESPONSE!! anyways if theres any actual questions ill feel free to reach out to me, otherwise keep moaping and moaning. im going to drain the nullsec swamp and when i do its going to be glorious!! youre ironclad ivory citadels are going to come crumbling down!! nullsec when im in power will be stripped of all the greed and power hogging they have done over the last decade!!
i literally didnt use ai
And then you follow it up by:
but for the love of all that is holy give it a break with the crying about ai for god sakes, the year is 2025 get off youre high self appointed horse….BE GONST!!!
So you didn’t use AI, but you’re also defending yourself that you used AI by just saying that it’s a particular year? That makes not a lick of sense. Again - the same person who writes a perfect sentence is not saying “BE GONST,” you’re just an open liar.
so you people stop going of with the schitzo talk about me using GPT.
Firstly, categorizing every critic of yours into “you people” shows a clear representation of how you think. “It’s me versus them” mentality, when in reality you should be trying to listen to what people say.
Secondly, everyone who points you out for blatantly lying is not schizophrenic, they just don’t buy into the AI swill that you’re trying to push. For someone who is clearly trying to imitate the right-wing side of politics, you sure are acting the opposite.
”I don’t take criticism, I only take responses that I enjoy - anything else is a total attack on me!” That’s exactly what your entire personality gives off. The fact that you think you’re going to win, when the only support anyone has seen was from some guy who probably is one of your buddies, is laughable and just outright delusional.
After all that struggle you went through to finally admit using AI in your original campaign post we’re right back to outrageously insisting you didn’t use AI again.
ngl didn’t see that coming.