As a 12 year old girl, serving multiple consecutive lifetime sentences in a federal penitentiary for blowing up pixelated spaceships in a fictional sci-fi video game, I can tell you that we gankers are pathological liars.
I would have to say that the true source of my remorse is that I don’t feel any remorse after blowing up fictional pixels.
You must be the sort of person who just heinously knocks over the opposing player’s poor unarmed pawn with your knight in some totally unfair move that jumps right over their bishop. I’m just glad this forum has helped me grasp the sheer abominable level of ganking in chess…and the severe trauma caused by ’ knight takes pawn’ moves. The International Chess Association have reviewed the evidence…and decided that in future chess pieces will not be able to kill each other and must just aimlessly shuffle around the board for 2 hours before a declaration that everyone won.
And I laugh maniacally when I do that. Much to the dismay of my equity-of-outcome focused therapist who says that that behavior is insensitive and violates safe-space play.
Hmm this is how I had thought would happen when a Ganker tried to answer the simple questions and see they even make up another excuse to find another way of tying No…
There was just 7 questions yet you found eight with your reply.
Another reason why I had left this thread alone so only the true Ganker witch would reply.
Not exactly a question as phrased, but the answer is No all the same. Simply bribing CONCORD with security tags solves any issues. I only gank occasionally, I get myself into more concord issues doing lowsec pvp.
