What does bumpers not being protected in lowsec have to do with concord? Nobody is protected by concord in low sec.
The whole wreck EHP afaik was not aimed at helping bumpers, but was introduced because of ppl shooting super wrecks in 0.0. Of course you have to spin it in a way that it sounds like AG made any impact.
The thing you completly miss is.
All the things you listed were added for the benefit of ALL players. However for example the removel of insurance payouts, was specifically aimed at gankers.
Now you might say that there need to be nerfs, to balance out the buffs which I would not even really have any issues with, however…
As stated before, everything you list was made for the benefit of all people and just gankers. You use these examples to justify nerfs to ganking and you still want more nerfs, for example you want to nerf bumping specifically to nerf ganking.
Now if you say that these buffs to all players, justify nerfs that specifically just affect one subgroup, while the others do not recieve nerfs to balance the buffs and find that this is OK. You simply show your bias against suicide ganking.
edit to make it easy… let´s go with just a single item on your list:
- The removal pof the build in rof penalty on destroyers
If this justifies a nerf to ganking to keep the balance, it justifies a nerf to everyone else as well. So which nerf would you propose that does not specifically target gankers. Or if you want a nerf that targets ganking which additional nerf to non gankers to you propose to keep your balance in tact?
After all… any buff, intentional or not… justifies a nerf to keep the balance, right?