So you are saying balancing ships on a Regular basis, as was promised by The executive producer to the elected player representatives, is Not worth it ?
Wtf guy.
4 ish months to go for 2017.
source: http://marketsforisk.blogspot.nl/2017/05/ccp-financial-statements-for-2016-review.html
Sansha Kuvakei grrrr
Ccp presuming what hisec pve players want based on nullsec pvp recommendations ofc.
Omir Sarikusa tho <3
1 Like
SO this threadnaught is about CCP not delivering a promised dedicated balance team for ships right ?
source: https://crossingzebras.com/balance-is-not-optional/
$70 monocle tho
1 Like
Jebus. What a douchebag behavior.
Wish dj FunkyBacon was here, his NDA should be expired by now 
CCpgames admitted they dont have time to balance hacâs ? Wth.
I feel you 
They said they didnât have the time before the February 13th patch. Câmon, man, you know they need to have everything done and buttoned-up by the 6th or so. Iâd rather they do the job right, and not half-ass it to try to balance them all out in 10 days.
1 Like
They had at least 8 months to come up with HAC balance suggestions and idea, heck they just need to look at the forums to find inspiration. There is no excuse whatsoever for them not to have HAC rebalance in this February release,
Well thats what you get when you have over generous fittings on some ships and extremely punitive fittings on others. What about the long long long overdue rebalance of small modules that STARTED in 2014? They even said last year (at Vegas?) that they would do a comprehensive sweep of every remaining subcap module in the game that hasnât yet received a rebalance.
Are 3 guys really enough to tackle thousands of items and the billions of permutations they can generate?
1 Like
Yeah hereâs a rebalance they can introduce - reducing PG so that HACs canât be cap stable with large batteries.
Yip because making them even worse than they are now will make more people fly themâŚ
If removing cap stability is enough to make them unviable then they have a host of other problems that need fixing.
Like their inability to catch the kiting ships. I fly a cynabal thatâs faster than a typical dramiel.
Well its an era where rapid lights are hitting huge ranges with perfect damage application and signature tanking doesnât exist anymore, and sig tanking is probably what made fights so skillful before rapid opâs 
1 Like
You can point to any two objects/actions/relations in the universe and say âThose are a group.â By this logic, Goonswarm and Pandemic Legion are a group. A lion and the gazelle sheâs hunting are a group. My foot and the Lesser Magellanic Cloud are a group. But what good does that do?
Donât leave out the important part about society: it is composed of INDIVIDUALS who willingly associate with one another. Itâs not enforced by nature. It is the product of intelligent agents assessing the benefits of association with others and organizing their belongings, actions, and ideas accordingly. But they donât have to. A person can still breathe, move, their heart still beats, and they wonât even starve, necessarily, from being outside of âsocietyâ. Thereâs no minimum DPS threshold to meet or squad bonus for having âfriendsâ in society.
Iâd further challenge whether a society truly is a âgroupâ in the sense that Iâm using the word âgroupâ in. A society is a dynamic, subjective thing. We may consider someone a part of our society while that person does not, or vice versa. For instance, a spy is not exactly a member of our society. A prisoner of war is not a member of our society. A criminal is not exactly a member of our society. Null sec players are notorious for denying that they are members of high sec society, despite playing there for a good proportion of their time in game.
Without acknowledging these two aspects of society, you are in fact advocating for totalitarianism.
Magical thinking.
In EVE, 10 people working together can artificially be better than 10 people working separately. But even in EVE, thatâs not always the case. Youâre not just magically more efficient with more people or more force. There must be some algorithmic reason that underlies any gain in efficiency. Just because 10 people can make something happen faster than 1 person doesnât mean they are more efficient. They are using 10 times the man-power and man-hours to increase their rate of production. And, if they should still fail at their task . . .
Are you feeling okay? This is my line. Remember?
You mean that very large grouping that wasnât as fit to survive history as the smaller groups and individuals that were its constituents?
Even if you do not like the AF changes and addition of ADC, you would not have either of those to complain about if they did not do them. So yes, your statement was not exactly fairâŚperhaps you prefer the word accurate?
Now if you only said there was no balancing work done because you want to be hyperbolic and rageyâŚOK, suit yourself. Donât be all butthurt that someone else doesnât follow you down that hole though