Does not change that the “amount” of material mined, is expressed in m³, while the “value” is expressed in isk.
Therefore, your claim was BS.
No, the “amount” is still in volume. That you misuse the terms is your issue, not mine.
Nope, I attacked your BS claim, that was , “amount of ore available in HS is not even close to the amount of ore mined in NS, looking at individual places”, by simply asking your source, which you had none and thus started to answer aggressively, by claiming that I was the one who had to provide data you did not have and still claimed.
you are wrong
doing afk mining in null in a rorq makes you at risk to
get ganked, since rorqs are a shiny target for most nullseccers
loose your expensive excavators due to npcs
loose your excavs due to red bombers or booshing command dessies
etc.
when you fly a 10B ship, believe me, you don’t want to loose it
so yes, some null sec areas are quite safe, because some players cooperate to keep it safe (intel, supercap umbrella, rolling wormholes, quick response fleets, cynos available on grid, etc). But, in a sandbox, they did exactly what can be done: cooperate to build your own sandcastle
but if a corpmate buys a rorq i would never recommend him to mine afk…
Or not. Because you specifically talk about the amount of ore, not the value of minerals
That’s not what you wrote, on the opposite :
yes it is, it’s the claim you made here :
In which you talk about VOLUME of ORE, and claim that the AVAILABILITY in INDIVIDUAL PLACES in HS is NOT EVEN CLOSE to what there is in NS.
Knowing that this is specifically false for moon mining, I knew that you were claiming BS.
Claiming that I was the one to provide the data that you don’t have, is aggressive. It’s a troll and made for the sole reason to not discuss, and to refuse the right of discussion to other people - which incidentally denies you the right to actually have an opinion.
Most Rorquals don’t get ganked in nullsec. They’re so strong that they required a dedicated group to actively go hunting for Rorquals. 90% of your most common roaming solo / small gangs don’t pose any risk to Rorquals.
You almost never lose Excavators to NPCs in null unless the person is mining on their own and falls asleep AFK. With more than 2/3 Rorquals in a belt, they usually keep each other safe and will rep one another’s drones.
You almost never lose Excavators to booshing Command Dessies unless you’re exclusively in goons and during a time when Olmeca Gold is actively hunting.
The ships are like 3b tops, the Excavators are the pricey parts but you can save 3/5 of them easily with a single Wetu depot, so it’s not as risky as you think it is.
Literally billions like him everywhere. Hubris and a tendency towards cognitive dissonance is personality flaw with which they are intimately familiar.
You directly rely on a BS statement that there is more volume of ore available in the moon in NS than in HS .
This is just ignorance, and a proof that ou have no idea what you are talking about.
Your statement also relies on the fact that balance in its current form is not needed in the game. Which by itself says that you are a complete idiot.
Only way capital ships should be allowed into factional highsec is if player has 7+ standing with said faction.
Any entry into faction space below said standing bring factional navy forces to bear.
And any Doomsday like modules detect causes the same thing no matter standings with faction.
Any standing or security lose should be double if in capital, triple if in super and quadruple if in titan.
So ganking with these power ship have a larger penalty.
I would go one step further, and add standing looses along with the normal security looses at equal rate.
As an added feature, if player in Capital or large any killrights and bounties have an added boost to the rewards given. So the default player with an CCP boosted isk bonus based on size capital to titan.
And as far as Rorq, the deployment requirement should be increased to at least 2x the default when deploying in highsec, due to increased traffic. This should decrease the number of Rorqs deployed at asteroid fields.
It’ll bring back standings as a meaningful part of the game, open up the opportunity for lv4 runners to sell standing sharing, in order to get all of your faction standings above 7+, and if you decide to gank with them, impose a more severe penalty.
Why do standings need to be brought back as a “meaningful part”?
This is already a thing without capitals.
Using a Capital to gank other capitals is silly given that you can just use subcaps like Bhaalgorns and Leshaks to a much greater efficiency. It’s cute that you realize that ganking is an issue, but are so dumb to only see ganking from the pov of a capital ship.
