It is not. You have openly questioned all of their integrity.
You accused Steve of using a ‘sycophantic troll army’ against you and insulted him as ‘exactly what is wrong with the CSM’. You accused him of wanting to ‘troll, disrupt, impugn, and destroy’ you (another questioning of his integrity). You have insulted him by associating him with ‘the four horseman[sic] of voting’—generally insulting all of the CSM, but specifically and by name directing it at Steve.
The shots at Brisc, he has enumerated clearly and concisely, I see no reason to repeat his work.
The Judge expressed concern for someone’s well-being (yours), which is a legitimate position to take. I understand that you didn’t like his implications, but you do come across as somewhat unhinged. In response to his concern, you attacked him. Repeatedly. I know Judge is a hands-on kinda guy, but that kind of response from you only cemented your image as confrontational, abusive, evasive, and frankly, toxic.
All 3 of the CSMs who’ve gone silent are likely still here, taking bets on how long most of us will continue to play with our food here. Brisc continues to respond because in each of your responses to him, you continue to lob new accusations and insults. If you stop, I think it’s likely that he’ll stop caring about you. As long as you continue to actively drag his name through the mud, he’ll defend himself—and he has every right to do so. If you don’t like that, stop impugning his integrity.
Nope, you’ve answered a few questions in a roundabout way and only then because YOU deemed them to be relevant or reasonable. The rest you’ve either ignored or called trolling.
Jesus Christ, man.
Are you saying that you aren’t hostile, intractable and belligerent? You certainly come across that way.
Thats not up to you.
Actually, it is up to me, and the rest of the electorate.
In recent years, CCP has reduced the size of the CSM from 14 to 10 members. The main reason for this was to make sure that all members from the CSM could make it to the summit.
CCP themselves have already admitted that having all 10 CSM members attending the summits has been highly beneficial. Travelling to Iceland to attend the summits can therefore be seen as an “implied” obligation.
Wether CCP wishes to interact with the CSM in person or via tele-conferencing is up to them to decide, not you.
Aside from those who agree with my views on ingame issues I will formulate closer to the election, I am only after the votes of those that disagree with the current format/existence of CSM.
You all seem to think I dont stand a chance with that.
Fine.
Then backoff and let me try.
The voters I want would never vote for you or your blocs anyways.
They dont vote, period, yet I have to get them to vote for me.
If you think I cant make it, then why waste time/effort trying to stop me.
Are you saying here that you believe that we were paid an allowance to cover our travel and rooms? If so, that’s not the case. They were arranged on our behalf and no money changed hands.
If that’s not what you’re saying, you appear to be saying that you intend, if you win, to pay your own way to Iceland for both summits.