Again, selective quoting, he specifically asked for a YES or NO answer.
1 Like
1 Like
This is a real quote, not selective.
I dont see any specific request for yes or no there.
Just if I have a passport, or not.
Itâs right above the question you continually quote.
2 Likes
poor Brisc, everytime he gets pinged itâs because Salvos is apparently unable to understand or answer a simple question in the format specified.
2 Likes
You should learn to read then, itâs as clear as the nose on your face that he specifically asked for a yes or no answer in the original post that youâre selectively quoting.
For clarity this is the relevant part of the post youâre misrepresenting via selective quoting; I have emphasised the bit you keep omitting.
3 Likes
I answered the below issued simple question in the format specified:
I do have a passport.
The fact that youâre not on the CSM is proof that it does work.
The funny thing is that regardless of anyoneâs stance on the CSM in general or any issue in particular, Iâve never seen a CSM member more engaged on the forums in discussing as broad a field of topics as @Brisc_Rubal. Every other CSM member in the history of the group has focused on broad CSM stuff or on their particular wheelhouse in particular. Brisc is the first Iâve seen make an effort on the official forums to actually understand issues. You, on the other hand, are a tool who literally REFUSES to understand, or at least acknowledge, the statements other people are making. CCP should reject your candidacy outright⌠and I even suspect you may already be disqualified according to the official rules.
2 Likes
No you did not. The format specified was either YES or NO.
It turns out that being out-pedanting* a pedant is quite satisfying.
*Yeah itâs not a word, but it fits.
2 Likes
This makes no sense.
Ive never run before through to nomination as CSM.
Nor does the CSM decide who votes for whom.
And Iâm fairly certain you wonât be running this next time either.
2 Likes
Its going to happen.
Something is, itâs unlikely to be what you think though.
1 Like
No. Youâre attempting to run. But your name isnât on the ballot. You donât get to decide whether it ever will be. Iâm 90% confident it wonât. Iâd be more confident if I cbaâd to look up the actual rules for disqualification.
1 Like
Then why are you and your ilk trolling this thread this hard that its past 1,140 posts?
Are you afraid?
Youâre just as much a part of the 1140 posts. It takes two to tango.
1 Like
Iâm somewhat obligated to answer.
So are we. There was a point in which it could have stopped, but you had to end a post with a jab. Itâs like you canât simply have the last post, you have to make a statement that provokes a response. I think itâs the intention of this thread, so far from the election. You like the negative attention and of course, the post count.
maybe answer briscs question then 
1 Like
Afraid isnât the right word. Some of us experience more emotions and motivations than anger and fear. Some of them are even delightful. You should try some of them out.
Really, what Iâm hoping is that CCP will look at this thread, and if there isnât already a rule disqualifying you from candidacy, that theyâll invent one special just for you. Whatever rule it is can only increase the quality of the candidates afterwards.
1 Like