Your position here leads to the inveitble comparision to how much an Alpha actually can earn in bounties compared to an Omega in anything.
Youre either being disingenous for some reason or are attempting to deflect the point that Alphas cannot make as much as they are worth to destroy into a pointless debate over the definition of value.
If you think they are fine as they are, why argue?
If you think they should be removed, there is agreement, so why argue?
If you think thereās a case for increasing thier ability to create wealth, what is it? Because you havent brought forward one.
Do you have a reason to debate this, or is it just for fun?
Taxing alphas for ratting is something that could be done. But we shouldnāt open up more industry. Even if itās taxed, as long as itās profitable itās infinitely scalable.
But that doesnāt do much for pvp which you seemed to think was a problem.
There is no amarr/gallente pirate ship. Itās inconsistent. Doesnāt mean we introduce a new line of ships just becauseā¦alphas werenāt restricted because of 'balance. They were restricted to stop alts scaling and nerfed to reduce botting.
If you come up with decent proposals with good argument to back em up, then we can have that conversation. Iām not the one being called troll here.
But if itās just because, you want to hurt alphas cause you donāt like them or ganking cause you donāt like it, then you were never here for an grown up conversation were you?
I admitted i didnāt have a link for alphas being meant for pvp. But the dev blog mentions alt scaling and several others have cited botting for the other restrictions on alphas.
Where as, at best, youāre being petty about inconsistencies. More likely you just want to nerf playstyles you donāt likeā¦
But if alphas can run level 4ās again, they will bot them just as they did before. And itās obvious to everyone that mining in a barge will be botted.
Industry and trade is because of ALT SCALING. and the extra tax isnāt as straightforward as just limiting alpha skills in that area.
Thereās enough evidence from faction warfare, vni ratting and missions to know what some players will do given half a chance. So itās not happening.
One is not dependent to the other.
Consistency is a small price to pay for restricting abuse. Like the example above, we arenāt going to shoe horn a ship together just to satisfy the amarr/gallente gap.
Inconsistency in this case is another way to say freedom. We are free the restrict alphas in problem areas and give them more in non-problem areas.
Well now i know youāre lying.
You donāt get your reputation for nothing Lucas.
Youāve recently come back to the game yeah? As an alpha per chance?
Is effectively what we have by restricting them to level 3ās. Same with ventures instead of barges.
The only problem is botting in null. Which i agree a tax could help.
When it comes to industry and trading yeah they could be missing some depth. And maybe they are missing gas mining in low/null/wh, but they certainly arenāt missing any depth from level4ās.
You could convince me to allow them a couple more industry slotsā¦and Iād have no problem with alphas gas mining.
So regarding depth; how does restricting safeties and t2 mods on alphas show them the depth of eve?
The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to courteous when disagreeing with others.
In order to maintain an environment where everyone is welcome and discussion flows freely, certain types of conduct are prohibited on the EVE Online forums. These are:
Trolling
Flaming
Ranting
Personal Attacks
Harassment
Doxxing
Racism & Discrimination
Hate Speech
Sexism
Spamming
Bumping
Off-Topic Posting
Pyramid Quoting
Rumor Mongering
New Player Bashing
Impersonation
Advertising