I’ll throw you an idea about that, boyo. Be quick and open your mind to catch it before you lose it! Here it is:
Spend 40.000 Euros on the game and buy PLEX. As we speak, the best PLEX package is 650 mula for 20.000 PLEX. So your 40K bag would net you (40.000/ 650) = 61,5 → round down to 61 packages x 20.000 = 1.220.000 PLEX.
Then spend at least a good chunk of that 1.22 million space mula on ships, modules, ammo, drones, implants and whatever you want. Your net worth, should be somewhere in the vicinity of 5.6 trillion ISK. Then make an audit video, upload it on youtube and share it with us, here. You have some examples of audit videos below. You do that and you put some meat behind your claims. But until you do so, know that as far as we are concerned, you’re nothing but a saggy balloon, half-filled with hot air.
On which alt? That one never logs on.
I’m almost certain that if you had 40,000 to spend on a PLEX you could contact CCP and agree a bespoke deal.
Also anyone wanting to make an impact with that would use it to pay other players in-game to act on their behalf.
The last 3 candlesticks are fantasy-world. I’ll slide you a little bit of info now, to help you not make a fool of yourself even further, boyo: I also trade. I trade for real. So I can read trade-charts. And just like I could tell right away that your first sprint-screen was a crock of hog-wash and exposed you publicly to your utter shame, I’ll to the same here:
1.) the last 3 candlesticks, as I said, are pure fantasy. That doesn’t happen in the real world. And if it does, it’s either an improbable stroke of luck or insider trading. In this case, it looks like you used a demo account again with a time buffer. For anyone who doesn’t know what that means: it delays the demo sheet’s trading by a set time so you can look at the real trading and make your trades ahead of time. In other words, as long as the demo account is concerned, it’s like you have the power to look into the future.
2.) Why is there hardly any value to volumes correlation, boyo?
- The chart looks Ok up until about 14:00 PM, when the huge dump starts. That is correlated with a big volume increase also, obviously a planned fire-sale (market dump). But then there is a significant volume decrease while the value continues to decrease with roughly if not exactly the same amount. It seems to me that either this a demo account and someone chose to fire-sale the exact same amount for 3 consecutive trading ticks, or the whole market coincided to trade the exact same amount for three trading ticks. Amazing! And don’t tell me it’s the New-York marked opening, we both know that not how it works in the real world.
- The candles and the volumes at the end. Woha, boy! Those are some stiff looking candles! Looks like the stock value of some company that just announced the perfected nuclear fusion. I’d want some of those stocks. But wait? No volume increase? Price hiking like it’s photoshopped, but not correlated with volume? Who’s trading? Everyone went to sleep and there are only two people trading and hiking the prices that high? Again, unbelievable.
In conclusion, it looks very much like you are using demo accounts to trade by yourself in a market bubble and you may very well be using a time buffer.
Or, at least in this case pictured above, you may have photoshopped part of the image, without knowing how to correlate value-trade-time-volume.
Here’s a honest and friendly advice, boyo: Stop! Just stop making a fool of yourself. It’s OK if you stop now. It’s an online video game forums section, we get it, you wanted to make a post, you dug down into it, we all had a laugh, it was fun, it’s OK until this point. But now it’s time to stop the charade. Anything beyond this point is just you digging yourself even deeper into a muddy hole of self-ridicule.
I don’t trade as everyone else in the entire world claims to do, but it kinda looks like what trading view shows:
I’m not sure why you guys are so obsessed with proving them to be lying. Probably because you need to feel superior.
You mean you don’t trade on real-world-linked accounts, instead you trade on demo accounts?
I don’t trade on any type of account, real or demo.
I sure hope he sold his positions before the price retraced all the way back to where it started.
Kind of looks, but not quite. In @Verlyn’s chart, The first dump is marked by a huge volume spike, followed by a comparable but obviously lower volume bar, 4 ticks later. In your tradingview screen-shot, the second volume is bigger than the first.
Also, on the third day - the day of the buying, your tradingview screen-shot has volume correlation. Which @Verlyn doesn’t.
This only goes to show that Verlyn does demo trading with a time-buffer, as I originally suspected. It was quite obvious, actually. @Elizabet_Forgrave thanks for the effort in proving me right!
You do realise that anyone can easily change the text on a web page to make it say anything ? I could make an authentic looking New York Times headline that said ‘Altara Zemara Made Ruler Of The Universe’. In fact the ability to change web text is one of the main methods used by ‘refund’ scammers.
Hail ruler, will I need a permit
Obsessed is a bit strong, but lying always deserves to be exposed for what it is. The alternate question is why does anyone in an internet game forum feel the need to lie in the first place?
To gain credibility? To add make it seem like fictitious arguments are factual?
If a truthful argument has weight, it can stand on it’s own without lies.
Whatever the reason, people who don’t know better might read those posts and believe them (not just on this stupid subject, but on all subjects relevant to the game also) and be swayed by people out to just deceive them.
Where that occurs, it’s in everyone’s best interest to expose it.
Is Broadcast for reps still a thing, that would be a good thing to support with real money or isk
Going as far saying I would photoshop fantasy candlesticks …
Priceless …
Did you even look at the Gold/Usd CFD chart in detail at all ? (XAUUSD) Those spikes happen all the time…
On London sessions, those moves tend to happen between 10 and 11am (GMT+1), and on NY sessions 3.30 and 4.15pm.
They’re the real moves of a said session, and usually when a major supply or demand zone is begging to be tagged out.
It is also called a stop-hunt or liquidity-hunt… and that’s what I trade specifically …
I also use wyckoff principles to spot out events and phases prior to a real breakout, and that happen to be it on the chart I shared : a break-out from an accumulation range.
Yes it was demo, for a funded account assessment.
I use tradingview as my analysis charting and either MT5 or MT4 for entries.
The time issue you mention is a thing, but negligible with Forex CFDs. I dont trade stocks, only Gold/Usd.
If you come from stock trading, you will have a lot of trouble understanding Gold’s volatility, as it’s pretty much its own animal, and unlike anything else.
I’ve been trading gold with both real and demo money for the last 2 years, every day almost.
I’ve lost a lot of money doing so, over 20k now, but such is the price of getting into trading, and especially Gold.
So if you’re interested in learning about it, that’s fine, but try to lecture me about it, and you’re setting yourself up for a world of pain, and also a massive waste of time, for both of us.
Let’s not go down the latter, I am actually begging you …
Of course, it’s called daytrading.
December is the most volatile month of the year for Gold, so it is not a trade and hold market at all atm.
We’re spending too much time thinking whether we could, and not enough time thinking whether we should.
furrows brow
OK, I’ve spent enough time thinking.
To project oneself.
I’ve been working hard on learning trading for the last 2 years, and I require to project myself in where I want to be with it, in order to achieve it.
Ever heard the story of Jim Carrey writing himself a check of 10 million dollars, keeping it in his pocket and making Dumb & Dumber a few years later, netting him that same amount ?
So I do have apologize to everyone for feeling misdirected.
I am indeed trying to radically change my life atm, and it’s tough, mentally.
The anonymity of online games and forums tend to serve as a receptacle of my daily frustrated projections, and I do apologize again for exposing you all into it.
You lie in order to protect yourself?
Seems strange. Telling the truth is far better defence to any argument than lies are.
Project.
Not Protect.
Read the rest of my reply, please.
So you lie to project?
Still seems extremely strange.