Yes, attention to the fact that we’re steadily moving toward a 100% Safe Highsec.
You may as well get used to the idea.
nah, if ccp wanted a safe bubble they would have done it in the beta.
it will never happen and if you want that happen so badly, bribe hilmar
1 Like
ChatGPT says:
She’s trying to sound clever while throwing shade. Here’s the boiled-down version:
- She starts with a jab saying something you posted wasn’t hearsay—implying you don’t know what hearsay even means.
- She brags (falsely humble style) about how she writes without AI help, unlike you—calling people who do use ChatGPT “miners” or “plebs.”
- She mocks your background claims, suggesting you’re lying about law enforcement or your long EVE history.
- She gives a long-winded, Wikipedia-lite lecture on hearsay, not to educate, but to flex and insult, implying you’re too dumb to understand it.
- She takes cheap shots, like calling you a “dimwitted troll,” claiming you “confessed” to not playing EVE, and accusing you of stalking her, even calling you “it” now, implying you’ve been replaced by AI.
- She ends with a smug sign-off, calling herself excellent.
TL;DR: It’s a sarcastic, self-aggrandizing rant meant to mock you, discredit your claims, and frame you as obsessed, unoriginal, and unintelligent—all while pretending to give a legal lesson.
Total bait.
So…ChatGPT actually got something right !
3 Likes
You really are a bot aren’t you?
You post proof from the internet, then your next post says you can’t believe what you read from the internet. You don’t understand your argument from one post to another.
5 Likes
he is a bot, a very badly one
2 Likes
It was an actual Eve Forum post with KM’s.
You’re definitely not the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree…
You don’t even understand the argument I was making in a single post. No wonder you don’t like complex things.
2 Likes
This player has switched back and forth between corporations 74 times, meaning they returned to a previous corp after leaving it—sometimes repeatedly. That’s a lot of flip-flopping for one capsuleer.
1. 2016-04-15 10:57 - The Scope
2. 2016-04-15 13:26 - Federal Defense Union
3. 2016-04-17 19:28 - The Scope
4. 2016-04-18 16:43 - Federal Defense Union
5. 2016-04-22 12:43 - The Scope
6. 2016-04-22 16:14 - Federal Defense Union
7. 2016-04-25 21:35 - The Scope
8. 2016-04-30 13:42 - The Scope
9. 2016-04-30 20:02 - Federal Defense Union
10. 2016-05-05 19:57 - The Scope
11. 2016-05-06 21:06 - Federal Defense Union
12. 2016-05-07 16:08 - The Scope
13. 2016-05-08 19:55 - Federal Defense Union
14. 2016-05-19 14:43 - The Scope
15. 2016-05-19 20:03 - Federal Defense Union
16. 2016-05-20 20:43 - The Scope
17. 2016-06-12 21:19 - The Scope
18. 2016-07-14 19:42 - The Scope
19. 2016-11-01 13:19 - Global Isk Network
20. 2016-11-04 22:26 - The Scope
21. 2016-11-16 18:52 - The Scope
22. 2016-11-18 19:30 - Federal Defense Union
23. 2016-12-04 14:03 - The Scope
24. 2017-01-20 22:37 - Bring Your Own Biatch
25. 2017-01-21 00:04 - The Scope
26. 2017-01-21 15:45 - Federal Defense Union
27. 2017-01-22 12:37 - Bring Your Own Biatch
28. 2017-01-27 15:24 - Federal Defense Union
29. 2017-02-13 14:21 - The Scope
30. 2017-07-18 14:19 - The Scope
31. 2017-09-14 21:10 - The Scope
32. 2017-11-04 15:09 - Bring Your Own Biatch
33. 2017-11-26 20:27 - The Scope
34. 2018-01-05 22:48 - The Scope
35. 2018-02-05 16:10 - The Scope
36. 2018-05-20 10:43 - Pandemic Horde Inc.
37. 2018-06-05 21:09 - The Scope
38. 2018-06-27 19:18 - The Scope
39. 2019-02-17 11:45 - The Scope
40. 2019-03-16 22:08 - Pandemic Horde Inc.
41. 2019-03-26 21:04 - The Scope
42. 2019-07-31 14:36 - Pandemic Horde Inc.
43. 2019-08-06 21:02 - The Scope
44. 2019-12-23 19:41 - State Protectorate
45. 2020-01-02 12:32 - The Scope
46. 2020-04-07 16:55 - The Scope
47. 2020-05-27 11:26 - Pandemic Horde Inc.
48. 2020-05-28 10:46 - The Scope
49. 2020-06-24 14:16 - Pandemic Horde High Sec Division
50. 2020-06-24 16:24 - The Scope
51. 2020-06-26 18:43 - The Scope
52. 2020-10-16 13:28 - Kybernauts
53. 2020-10-19 21:26 - The Scope
54. 2020-10-25 00:27 - Kybernauts
55. 2021-01-07 18:41 - The Scope
56. 2021-04-07 16:59 - Federal Navy Academy
57. 2021-11-04 21:16 - Kybernauts
58. 2022-02-09 22:09 - Federal Navy Academy
59. 2022-02-24 22:05 - State Protectorate
60. 2022-08-13 15:24 - Federal Navy Academy
61. 2022-10-02 21:46 - State Protectorate
62. 2022-11-21 16:02 - Federal Navy Academy
63. 2022-11-24 15:55 - State Protectorate
64. 2023-01-25 20:55 - United Caldari Navy
65. 2023-01-25 20:59 - Federal Navy Academy
66. 2023-01-25 23:04 - United Caldari Navy
67. 2023-01-27 23:56 - State Protectorate
68. 2023-05-19 21:06 - Federal Navy Academy
69. 2023-10-16 20:42 - Federal Navy Academy
70. 2024-03-11 22:42 - Federal Navy Academy
71. 2024-03-14 13:45 - Federal Navy Academy
72. 2024-06-14 09:38 - Korinthian Kommune
73. 2024-07-19 14:30 - Federal Navy Academy
74. 2025-02-13 19:09 - Federal Navy Academy
I am sorry Swing Vote if we carbon units seem rash and chaotic to you. We are not as precise as you digital folks.
1 Like
I just find him criticizing me adorable.
HiSec was never “100% safe”.
In the past, CONCORD could be tanked, and you could escape from them. So you could gank without CONCORD blowing you up.
Any player corporation could be wardec’d by any other player corporation for a flate rate.
Actually, HiSec is safer today than it ever has been: corporations are immune from wardecs until the place a structure (they just use holding corps for that), mining barges have more tank than ever (especially procurers), Orca tank got a significant buff, if you steal someone’s can now you have suspect and everyone can shoot you and not just that one person.
HiSec is way safer than ever. If you’re getting blown up by other players in HiSec the only fault is on you.
6 Likes
@Swing_Vote1 Since you were here from the beginning. 
How old are you considering eve’s demographic profile back then. Are you suffering from dementia or Alzheimer’s? I have to deal with people with those sad afflictions every day. You have my deepest sympathy.
1 Like
o/
I have to admit, in as much as I was trained and studied to be a historian, I found this to be a delightful challenge. I enjoy researching, and while CCP has “vanished” the earliest iteration of the EVE forum, I was able to find the following:
I am including one of the respondents posts here, for those interested in a summation of the thread:
For those who didn’t click the link, this post seems to predate usage of the word “ganking”. As you follow the thread one poster admits to:
A few days ago I was attacking people in Duripant which is a 1.0 and the police weren’t there and the sentry guns didn’t do anything. So everybody kinda started attacking everybody.
Pator is the system initially mentioned. While no one explicitly writes they are attacking new players in these two starter systems, obviously violence was happening, and violence the respondents as a whole thought should involve Concord in some manner.
This time period predates my involvement in EVE, by 10 years. It seems from reading this section of the earliest EVE forum, Concord still has bugs? Is being worked on?
Anyhow, speculation was occurring, in 2003, as to what should be expected with Concord, in Highsec, with specific mentions of two starters systems.
As an aside, as you can see from the screenshot, afk mining was being discussed in such threads already.
During this time period, so roughly 2 1/2 to 3 months after EVE’s debut in May 2003, pilots were debating safety in Highsec, name changes, and the price for EVE.
Links for the 3 mentions listed here:
I’m just tossing those in, as we’re still debating these issues/topics on the current iteration of the EVE forum.
@Swing_Vote1 , thanks. I had fun looking it up, 
6 Likes
The good old days when you could solo gank any mining ship with a T1 fit Catalyst.
1 Like
Or if you were smart enough to avoid that!
It’s always been easy to avoid. Don’t mine on the warp in. Warp out when you see combat probes or local spikes.
1 Like
Then. Now? That would require effort.
Welp, guess you aren’t even passingly familiar with the basic ideas of faction warfare and obviously can’t glean possible intel.
You’ve played EvE for 22 years you say, eh?
3 Likes
I can’t believe someone who’s allegedly been in EVE 22 years doesn’t understand the very simple explanation for this. It’s entirely about joining corporations/factions for the duration of a war…and then returning to an original non-wardeccable corp. Its a very common practice…and has nothing to do with flip-flopping over loyalty to a corp.
1 Like