I see you still only have enough courage to banter your threats and insults in text, Lord Chakaid.
I’m glad that this subhuman, this person of lesser blood, was able to reach the ears of King Khanid. I must be saying something right, to bother him so. How is he doing, by the way? Well, I suppose I need to be specific and say, how is Farokh doing. It’s easy to mix them up when they’re the same person, afterall.
The Reclaiming will begin once the true Emperor Khanid sits on the throne.
For the moment, let us set aside the words of the Apocryphon, wherein it states that all may become Chosen. Just, set them aside, for now. And let us consider the words that this… sub-Baron Chakaid, if that is his real name, chose to use on the IGS.
My god damn sides.
Let us consider the Words of the very first Book of the Scriptures.
The great Amarr Empire was founded to cultivate the spirit of man.
It says ‘man’. No mention of ‘subhuman’. So, what sub-baron Chakaid has chosen to do, is assert that some people, are ‘subhuman’ and thus fall outside the remit of the Reclaiming. For if some people are ‘subhuman’, then, logically, they cannot be Reclaimed as part of the Empire, as the Amarr Empire is for cultivating the spirit of Man, not cultivating the spirit of subhumans.
Now then, it also says in the Scriptures that:
“Lead all children to the light of God, for Heaven is theirs to inherit.”
Well, that would encompass the ‘subhuman’ too, wouldn’t it ?
And the Scriptures also say that:
For whosoever shall lay his life down for his Lord
He shall be taken into the arms of God
Whosoever, does include the ‘subhuman’, does it not ?
So, clearly, we can see from the Scriptures that the Orthodox Amarr hold to, remember, I’m not even quoting the Apocryphon here, that there is no such thing as a ‘subhuman’, because all must be Reclaimed.
Unless, we are to entertain the notion that King Garkeh/Farokh Khanid 2/3, and his minion sub-baron Alar of Zirsem V (a backwater planet in a backwater system in a backwater petty kingdom), have decided to break with Theology Council doctrine, and assert the existence of a class of ‘sub-human’, in defiance of all reasonable interpretations of the fundamental Scriptures.
Which would of course be, at best heterodoxy. More likely heresy. Or indeed, blasphemy by perverting the fundamental essence of the Scriptures - if some planets are populated by ‘subhumans’, then they cannot be Reclaimed.
So, which is it, sub-baron @Alar_Chakaid ? Are you and King Farkeh Khanid 4, are you heretics or blasphemers ?
Let the IGS be the judge:
Lord Chakaid,
Have you done anything in the last 3 years except watching the feeds waiting for someone to mention your selection of a Blood Raider as a champion candidate? Aside from the baiting of your betters by leveraging your position with the King Khanid, I cannot find any records of your successes.
It is embarrassing that you have chosen to repeatedly denigrate those who have a clear and recorded history of not only better birth than yourself, but more achievement in life.
The person guilty of arrogating things to which they lack understanding is you, allowing your own pride to prevent you from accepting that you completely failed to vet your candidates. You attempted to throw your King’s hat in the ring behind a Blood Raider. Upon being made aware of this, you doubled down and tried to imply that it wasn’t the case. He continued to prove his heresy.
The question raised here was NOT of His Majesty King Khanid II’s right to succession, it was the possible acceptance of known heretic as his vassal. The mistake was mentioning King Khanid’s name at all, since it was your ignorance, incompetence or outright heresy that allowed this to happen in the first place.
I suggest you stop throwing insults and threats at those who continue to work to prove their faith and loyalty to the throne.
I suggest you reconsider throwing your King’s name behind your own mistakes, cease dragging his great name through the mud to cover your incompetence, and take ownership of your actions.
I suggest rather than try and sow seeds of rebellion and discontent in The Empire, you work to repair the rift created by the previous hostility of a now deceased Empress and King, in the spirit of the unity brought forth as one of their final acts together.
The same spirit that our Divinely appointed Empress and Khanid heir are working hard to bolster.
If you’d prefer to ignore all that and instead want to follow up on your bloodlust, you need only follow the trail of dead Blood Raiders and Sabik sympathizers to find those with whom you are so obsessed.
Empress guide us,
Admiral Ascentior,
Paladin Commander of the Excubitoris Chapter of the Sacred Throne Order,
Honorary Fabricator-General of the Imperial Navy,
Divine Commodore of the 24th Imperial Crusade
@Deitra_Vess:
?
Ah. The Blood Raider in King Khanid’s court returns. Has my calling you out caused setbacks in your fantasy of becoming the next Karsoth?
I am still unsure whether Khanid II knew about Edeity’s allegance to Omir, but you certainly did. Likewise, I have no problem with Khanid III, so far, save that he continues to employ someone whose loyalty is so clearly compromised.
And here you are again, blathering on about the visceral punishments you would like to commit against anyone who has called out your open support of a Blood Raider.
Do keep going. The obsession with punishments such as impalement does not exactly help your case.
Lord Admiral Gaven Lok’ri
Chapter Master of the Excubitoris Chapter of the Sacred Throne Order.
Yes please…
As the offense occurred here I have been so instructed by the Margrave of the Taravam Marches to relate the following:
The Most Venerable and Ancient Margrave Kaeun Kezak, Holder of the Taravam Marches, vassal to the Duchy of Gosalav, sworn to His Royal Majesty Arrach Sarum of the Royal Family of House Sarum, has declared custody over the Penitent Vykiomi Kezak by right of blood and marriage to the Margravy of Taravam on the charge of utterance of false opinion. The Most Venerable and Ancient Margrave Kauen Kezak notes the Penitent has abjured herself faithfully and sincerely upon admonishment by the Margravy of Taravam the following contraventions of Holy Writ and doctrine:
- That the blood of Amarr is to be mixed with the blood of the indentured and conquered by laying with the slave.
It is noted by the Most Venerable and Ancient Margrave Kaeun Kezak, that the Penitent has been corrected by admonishment and accepts that as according to Holy Writ:
None shall stand higher than you save the Sefrim,
Who serve Me as others shall serve you,
For all things under Me serve one higher;
So Amarr shall rule the worlds of the Heavens.
-The Scriptures, Book of ReclaimingThe slave is to be considered to serve beneath Amarr just as equally as beasts are beneath and made to serve Amarr. To assert that Amarr would lay with a slave is commensurate with an assertion of beastiality, and constitutes an utterance of false opinion.
It is noted by the Most Venerable and Ancient Margrave Kauen Kezak that the Penitent has been made to Witness a breeding facility and the Penitent attests of her own volition that no occurrences of beastiality in which Amarr lay with the slave exist. That the processes that do exist within such facilities are to be considered no more and no less benign than an act of animal husbandry made upon the slave by another slave, just as a beast must be made to breed with another beast, by the discretion of the powers invested unto a Holder under God for the purpose of the selective breeding of beneficial livestock in service to Amarr.
It is noted by the Most Venerable and Ancient Margrave Kaeun Kezak, that the penitent has submitted herself to all pains and penalties to be be imposed for utterance of false opinion as so promulgated by Sacred Canon and Decree against such offenders.
It so decreed by the Most Venerable and Ancient Margrave Kaeun Kezak under the invested powers and authority as Holder of the Taravam Marches that the Penitent Vykiomi Kezak is to be condemned to the following pains and penalties for the crime of utterance of false opinion as so promulgated by Sacred Canon:
The Penitent is to castigate herself once upon each wrist through self-flagellation, by method of her own choosing, upon which all sins are absolved with the anointment of sacred waters to her flesh. Restitution of her titles as Princeps to the Kezak Holdership and Margravy of Taravam shall be given upon such absolution.
So decreed by the Most Venerable and Ancient Margrave Kaeun Kezak, Holder of the Taravam Marches.
In the year of our Lord God, CE23356.
I, Vykiomi Kezak, Princeps to the Kezak Holdership and Margravy of Taravam, so attest sincerely that the above proscriptions have been so applied through the castigation of each wrist once by the palm of my own hand and that I have absolved my sins through the anointment of sacred waters upon my flesh.
Truly, the cruelties of the Most Venerable and Ancient Margave of the Taravam Marches are the wisdom of the wise.
so, a slap on both wrists, and a bath.
Aaaaaallllrighty then.
Maybe the water was salty at least?
Truly, your dad the Margrave is as much of a jerk as you are.
Edit: Also, wouldn’t the Heirs properly be styled ‘Your/His/Her Royal Highness’, as ‘Royal Majesty’ is reserved to the sovereign?
Margravine as the wife of a Margrave is correct; however since my Father, the former Margrave and Holder is no longer alive the use of either Margravine or Margrave as the bearer of titles to Holdership of the Taravam Marches would also be correct, and either can be used as preference to style by the Holder of such titles.
Well, since ‘Margravine’ wasn’t used at all, either in my statement or by
I don’t really know why you’re bringing it up now. I think the Margrave’s a jerk for calling slaves ‘beasts’. My issue with the forms of address had nothing to do with ‘Margrave’ or Margravine’ (both of which, after all, are just variants on ‘Graf’), but on this:
HRM would be the sovereign. In this case, Her Imperial Majesty, Empress Kittens. Arrach Sarum, as a ‘royal’ Heir, would be ‘His Royal Highness’.
I’m sorry*, but, I read it as Margarine. And now I cannot unsee this.
I’m not actually sorry one bit.
So, @Alar_Chakaid some… information… has come into my hands, regarding the circumstances around the apprehension of the former disgraced Chamberlain Dochuta Karsoth.
Now, the information that I have been given, states that Garkeh, King Khanid II, had actually been harboring Dochuta Karsoth inside the Kingdom, for political leverage reasons, and that Empress Jamyl had got wind of this. So in a rush operation, Royal Khanid Navy ships retrieved Karsoth from his hiding place in Khanid space, and dumped him over the border in the Anath system, then claimed to the Imperial authorities that they had apprehended him.
Anath, as is obvious, is in Imperial space. So RKN warships crossed the border illegally, to bombard an Imperial moon, in a political operation to save King Khanid’s reputation.
So, King Khanid handed over the disgraced Chamberlain, and agreed to drop his claim to the Imperial throne, and swear fealty to Empress Jamyl, to stave off the Empress from enacting bloody and furious vengeance upon the Kingdom and it’s jumped-up monarch, for this shocking provocation.
I mean, naval forces of another power actively bombarding your celestial objects ? That’s an act of war ! King Khanid was committing acts of war against the Empire. And Empress Jamyl was poised to smack him down hard, so he threw out Karsoth to pacify her anger.
Quite correct. The usage of style, His Royal Majesty was an expression of the deference and respect extended to His Royal Highness Arrach Sarum by a vassal to their liege. Nothing more.
I’d think respect would dictate getting it right, and not appearing to disrespect the Empress by elevating her own vassal to equivalent status. After all, it might make Lord Sarum appear to be encouraging such stylings.
If you don’t use the right forms of address, you might as well be addressing them as “Hey, buttmonkey!”, which most people would find objectionable.
Even unconventionalites like Ibrahim.
Did you mean to say, Garkeh Khanid version 2.0?
There is some fairly substantial evidence to that effect, after all.
I thought you were Garkeh 2.0.